A market message has once again made Hyperliquid the focus of attention.
According to reports, Hyperliquid Labs is in deep negotiations with Payward, the parent company of Kraken. If the proposal gains regulatory approval, Bitnomial, under Payward, will allow eligible U.S. users to trade perpetual futures linked to the prices of certain crypto assets on the Hyperliquid chain.
Upon seeing this, many people's first reaction is: Hyperliquid is finally going to fully enter the U.S.
But this is not a fact that has already happened. The two parties have not announced a completed deal, and the regulatory authorities have not approved the proposal. The specific product list and commercial terms have not been made public, and both Payward and Hyperliquid Labs have declined to comment.
If this news is interpreted merely as "U.S. users are coming," it underestimates its true significance.
What Hyperliquid is exploring may not simply be opening a new region, but connecting its on-chain market capabilities to an already existing licensed trading and clearing system in the U.S.
It is not U.S. users directly connecting to Hyperliquid, but Bitnomial acting as a compliance entry point
According to the currently disclosed plan, U.S. users will not directly access Hyperliquid's decentralized trading platform but will trade selected perpetual futures within the regulated venue of Bitnomial.
The two paths seem similar but are fundamentally different.
Bitnomial is not a temporary "compliance shell." Reports indicate that it has the trading, clearing, and brokerage infrastructure required for the U.S. derivatives market; Kraken has previously used this system to offer CFTC-regulated perpetual futures to eligible U.S. clients.
In other words, Payward provides the licensed channel needed to enter the U.S. market, while Hyperliquid may provide the products, technology, or on-chain market capabilities.
This is the part of the news that is most worthy of study.
Hyperliquid may be transforming from an "exchange" into infrastructure callable by institutions
In the past, the market has regarded Hyperliquid as an on-chain perpetual platform resembling a centralized exchange. Users would come to Hyperliquid and directly use its order book, margin system, and liquidity.
But if the cooperation with Payward ultimately takes shape, the logic may become: Users do not necessarily need to come directly to Hyperliquid; Hyperliquid's market capabilities can also be repackaged and distributed through licensed institutions.
This is very similar to the division of infrastructure in traditional finance. Users only see the brokerage front end, while what is actually connected behind might be another set of trading, clearing, custody, and liquidity networks.
For Hyperliquid, the strategic value of this model may manifest on three levels.
First, it offers a more realistic path for the U.S. market than "applying from scratch for a complete exchange system." The challenges of the U.S. market have never been solely about products, but also about trading venues, clearing, client access, and regulatory obligations. Collaborating with an existing licensed system allows both parties to handle the parts they are best at.
Second, this may validate that Hyperliquid's capabilities can be institutionally outputted. If regulated trading venues are willing to introduce products related to its technology or on-chain assets, it means Hyperliquid's influence is no longer limited to crypto-native users but has the opportunity to enter the product distribution chain of traditional finance.
Finally, it provides new imaginative space for Hyperliquid's long-term positioning: in the future, it may not just be an on-chain trading venue that requires users to actively access, but also may become the market infrastructure behind other trading platforms, brokerages, and financial applications.
The real benefit is not "an influx of U.S. users overnight"
Hot news often creates an illusion: once the cooperation is reached, vast amounts of U.S. capital will immediately pour into Hyperliquid, and trading volume, income, and HYPE prices will all rise synchronously.
Reality is not that simple.
Even if the proposal is approved, U.S. users may only be able to trade a small number of selected contracts; how these contracts utilize Hyperliquid technology, how the income is allocated, and whether there are connections to existing repurchase mechanisms remain unanswered.
Moreover, some in the market view the emergence of names like "Kraken HIP-3 test DEX" in the test network as evidence of cooperation, but anyone can use any name on the test network, so this cannot prove Kraken's involvement, nor can it prove that the final proposal will necessarily be realized through HIP-3.
Therefore, a more accurate understanding of this news should be:
It is not a realized bonus from the U.S. market, but a signal that a compliance path is being seriously discussed.
The value of the signal lies in it indicating that licensed U.S. institutions may begin to consider how to integrate the product capabilities of the on-chain perpetual market into the regulated system; the uncertainty lies in the fact that negotiations, regulatory approvals, product designs, and income allocations still have multiple variables.
In the face of regulatory-level news, verify capital first, then decide whether to trade
This kind of news often possesses both high impact and high uncertainty. Within minutes of the headline appearing, the market may first trade on the imaginary space; details will prompt capital to reassess actual value.
Experienced traders facing such market conditions typically do not just ask, "Is this news positive?" but will continue to observe: is the increase accompanied by rising open interest, is the funding rate overheating quickly, are main accounts continuing to increase their positions or cashing out based on the news, and whether subsequent announcements or CFTC filings arise.
This is also the value of AiCoin's mobile terminal in the Hyperliquid trading scenario. It does not judge for users how the news will play out but puts news, market behavior, capital actions, and trade execution into the same decision-making chain.
Upon seeing major news, users can first use professional candlestick charts and open position data to determine whether the market is forming a real trend, and then track whether smart money is chasing long positions, short selling, or gradually taking profits. When price structure and capital behavior mutually confirm, users can connect to Hyperliquid via AiCoin to complete the order; after the trade, they can continue to view assets and positions in a unified manner on the mobile terminal, avoiding losing risk control due to hot sentiments.
In the face of significant regulatory news, running the fastest does not necessarily matter most; what matters more is to discern "confirmed facts" and "market imagination" faster than others.
Conclusion
Negotiations between Hyperliquid and Payward have not yet finalized, but this matter has already provided a perspective more worthy of attention than short-term prices: the entry of on-chain finance into the mainstream market may not only follow the path of "migrating traditional institutions on-chain," but may also involve licensed institutions retaining the compliance front end while integrating on-chain technology and market capabilities into the backend.
If this path ultimately succeeds, Hyperliquid will gain not just a new user market but potentially an identity upgrade—from an on-chain trading platform to a trading infrastructure callable by global financial institutions.
Exclusive benefits for AiCoin users
👉 Enter the invitation code AICOIN88 when binding the Hyperliquid account to enjoy a 4% commission rebate.
🔗 Exclusive registration link:
https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
📖 Beginner's tutorial:
- "AiCoin PC terminal Hyperliquid authorized trading tutorial":
https://www.aicoin.com/zh-Hans/article/514197
- "AiCoin mobile terminal Hyperliquid authorized trading tutorial":
https://www.aicoin.com/zh-Hans/article/541383
- "Zero-based introduction! Detailed pictorial guide for first trade on Hyperliquid":
https://www.aicoin.com/zh-Hans/article/510225
📖 Community communication:
-Telegram:
https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
-Discord:
https://discord.gg/5XSXjXSpz
-AiCoin-group chat:
https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
The content of this article represents only the author's personal viewpoint and does not reflect the platform's stance. The opinions, conclusions, and suggestions in the article are for investors' reference only and do not constitute any investment advice related to the platform. Investing in U.S. stocks still requires independent assessment of market risks, regulatory risks, and compliance risks with local laws and regulations (especially foreign exchange controls, overseas investment declarations, etc.).
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
