Recently, FOMO has been very popular.
The timeline is no longer filled with FOMO.
Instead, it continues to have FOMO within FOMO.
Looking back at TOAD now, the contrast is indeed quite large.
TOAD originally had a great opportunity to become a model project for Pumpfun to counter FOMO.
The configuration was almost fully loaded:
Pumpfun's early investor @mdudas personally got involved.
Discovered the project through the information flow on the Pump mobile terminal.
After buying in, DEV transferred about 18% of the chips to him.
Then changed his avatar, kept playing with memes, publicly distributed tokens, and stated that he would not sell.
People were here.
Chips were here.
The story was here.
"The first Pepe of 1988," although a bit archaeological, at least has some memorable points compared to the zoo produced in bulk every day.
@mdudas even publicly stated:
With the help of @a1lon9, he wants to send TOAD into the accounts of Pump's one hundred thousand daily active users.
The ideal result was very full, but the market was very honest.
TOAD peaked over 20 million dollars in market value.
Now it is left with just over 4 million dollars.
What's more embarrassing is that @mdudas keeps mentioning @a1lon9, but there has been no visible response from the other party on the public timeline.
One person is tirelessly ringing the bell on stage.
The other person seems to have set group messages to Do Not Disturb.
This is currently the most research-worthy aspect of TOAD.
The problem may not be that the narrative isn’t good enough, nor that @mdudas isn’t trying hard.
On the contrary, he has been very diligent.
The problem is that the advantage of FOMO has never just been one KOL plus a large package of chips.
What truly makes FOMO powerful is a group of leaders simultaneously publicly holding positions, spreading information among each other, and converting attention directly into trades through social relationships.
This is a continuously operating distribution network.
Currently, TOAD resembles more of:
@mdudas alone carrying eighteen boxes of ammunition, crazily shouting for people at the Pump entrance.
As a result, the Pump boss passes by without even rolling down the window.
Thus, TOAD at this stage has not proven that social trading on Pump can counter FOMO.
It instead proves one thing:
A big KOL can ignite interest.
But if the platform doesn't take over, the fire can only burn KOL's face in the end.
Whether the price can be pulled back later is uncertain.
But this time @mdudas's reputation certainly has taken a hit.
A price drop can still be said to be washing the盘.
But when the boss is seen and doesn't reply, that is truly hard to reconcile.
Quickly register for FOMO, let Pumpfun anxiously wait, registration link:
https://fomo.family/r/duanwangye66
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。