On July 21, 2026, Base co-founder Jesse Pollak posted on X, saying "We are behind," instantly turning the previously quiet tokenized stock track into a race to catch up. According to a single source, in a tweet that was later repeatedly cited by several Chinese media outlets, he praised Robinhood Chain's launch of tokenized stocks in the EVM environment as a "step in the right direction," while candidly admitting that Base's progress in this field "frustrates him," and publicly acknowledged for the first time: Robinhood had already made a move on-chain. The difference is that Robinhood chose to offer stock exposure on EVM through a derivatives model, while Pollak revealed that Base is working with its parent company Coinbase to plan a tokenized stock solution fully backed 1:1 by real stocks, deliberately distancing itself from the former. One bets on an "efficient, lightly regulated" derivative structure, while the other attempts to hedge compliance risks with "full asset backing." The underlying model divergence reflects the increasingly tense tug-of-war between on-chain speed and regulatory red lines, as well as the real tension in the upcoming 1:1 token stock battle.

Frustration and Catching Up: Jesse Pollak's Public Statement

After Robinhood Chain launched tokenized stocks, Jesse Pollak finally broke his silence on July 21. He candidly stated on his personal X account that Robinhood Chain's launch of tokenized stocks in the EVM environment is a "worthy attempt in the right direction" (according to a single source), publicly acknowledging that the "first mover" in this track belongs to the competitor. Even more unusual, he did not use the usual PR rhetoric to obscure the gap but wrote very sharply—Base's "progress is lagging, and that frustrates me" (according to a single source). In the mouth of a high-level team leader who values emotional management and expectation management, the word "frustration" appears extraordinarily stark, serving both as a candid admission to the outside world and as pressure within the organization.

In the same tweet, he provided a remedy path: Base is working with Coinbase to advance related products, "to address the lagging issue" (according to a single source), with the goal of launching a tokenized stock solution fully backed 1:1 by real stocks (according to a single source). This statement currently remains at a personal opinion level, with no longer official documents or technical white papers following up, and reports from several Chinese media outlets merely amplify this tweet repeatedly. However, for the industry and the Base community, it already constitutes a clear signal: the head of the team admitting to lagging and openly affirming the competitor's route tells everyone—tokenized stocks will be the main battlefield for Base's upcoming narrative, and the "remedial plan" with Coinbase will determine whether this 1:1 token stock story can turn from a slogan into reality.

Betting on Compliance Narrative

When Pollak wrote "fully backed 1:1 by real stocks" in his tweet, he set the narrative coordinates for the tokenized stock story of Base/Coinbase: not more aggressive financial engineering, but rather as close to traditional stock holdings as possible. This design lends itself to being interpreted as a "compliance-first" stance—where the chain is just a vehicle, the underlying is still real stocks that can be verified by accounts and can align with traditional custody systems, rather than just derivatives contracts offering price exposure. The statement in the research brief that "may emphasize compliance and asset security more" now has a tangible placement after this tweet: Robinhood uses derivatives, while Base attempts to imply its continuity and explainability with the traditional regulatory world through 1:1 stock backing.

For Base, this bet does not come out of nowhere. Over the years, Coinbase has shaped itself in a traditional regulatory context as an exchange emphasizing compliance and risk control, which has become a consensus background in the industry. Now, with Base as its L2, being pulled into the tokenized stock narrative fundamentally draws on this accumulated "safety credit": ensuring that users facing a brand new on-chain stock form think first not about "will it explode," but rather "this is backed by Coinbase." However, the more it waves the banner of compliance and asset security, the more the information gaps seem stark in reality—currently, the official side has neither given a product name, disclosed technical architecture and compliance framework, nor clarified a launch date or which types of stocks will be covered. The market has begun scripting the "1:1 spot backing vs derivatives" showdown, while what Base can truly provide remains just a tweet and several blank statements. This gap between expectations and information is becoming the most fragile part of this compliance narrative.

Robinhood Chain's Head Start

Contrasting with Base's still lingering at the blueprint and commitment stage, the research brief mentions that Robinhood has already turned tokenized stocks into a click-tradeable product in the EVM environment, initially choosing the derivatives model: users receive not a straightforward asset mapping like "a share of Apple on-chain custody," but rather a contract-style exposure following the underlying stock's price fluctuations. For those familiar with financial engineering, the advantage of this pathway lies in achieving low barriers to entry and significant configuration space. However, there is a structural design layer that separates the assets from the on-chain credentials, meaning risk exposure falls more on issuing and counterparty performance rather than on "you have one share corresponding to the custody account on-chain." The problem is that, with existing public information, there are no details on how exactly Robinhood designed this structure, nor how it handles compliance and custody; the outside world can only fill in the imagination based on the limited anchors of "has already launched" and "adopts a derivatives model."

Even so, early movers naturally occupy the narrative high ground. Robinhood itself holds a vast retail securities user base, and when it places its brand on a chain named after itself and first presents a usable version of tokenized stocks in the EVM context, the market quickly forms the consensus that "Robinhood is ahead in native tokenized stocks on EVM." It is against this backdrop that Pollak publicly evaluated Robinhood Chain's choice on X as a "correct direction" on July 21, 2026, effectively acknowledging that this "first to move" route has its reasoning while also putting Base's sense of delay in the spotlight: on one side, the derivatives path that has already started running, even if details are unclear; on the other side, a 1:1 spot backing solution that remains at the level of tweets and ideas. In this contrast, Robinhood's head start is not just a temporal advantage but is quietly reshaping the default narrative coordinates of this track.

Two Paths of Contest: Spot Backing Against Derivatives

From the intuitive perspective of token holders, 1:1 full asset backing and the derivatives model answer two entirely different questions: the former emphasizes "there is a real stock being custodially held behind the token in my hand," while the latter stresses "what I receive is a contract exposure to changes in the stock's price." By common definition, the 1:1 model requires that the custody end holds an equal amount of underlying stocks, making the token more like a "custody certificate" that can be split and circulated on-chain. The comfort comes from that layer of comprehensible real asset holdings, which is also easier to narrate as a compliance path that extends traditional securities accounts; whereas the derivatives model relies on contracts or structured products to replicate price curves, fundamentally as long as the issuer's performance reliability is sound, users can gain from the underlying's price ups and downs, but the transparency on "whether they truly hold underlying stocks" is naturally weaker, more akin to over-the-counter derivatives in regulatory perception rather than directly custody-held securities positions.

The costs manifest on the other end. The 1:1 spot backing ties each token to a share of underlying stock, restricting the pace of expansion to the actual custodial scale, biased towards capital efficiency, yet achieving clearer asset correspondence and a more explainable risk control narrative; the derivatives model does not necessitate a one-to-one match of underlying stocks, allowing better capital utilization through margin or structured hedging, and offering more flexibility in cross-regional issuance and product assembly, but simultaneously concentrating more risk and trust on the issuer's balance sheet and risk control model. The contrast provided in the research brief is: Robinhood follows the derivatives path in EVM tokenized stocks, while Base and Coinbase plan to create tokens fully backed 1:1 by real stocks. This suggests both may be intentionally misaligned in targeted user personas and regulatory expectations—the former seems to be catering to global crypto users willing to shoulder product complexity for convenient price exposure, while the latter builds walls for a side that is more risk-averse and sensitive to custody and transparency, following its existing positioning of "emphasizing compliance and asset security." In this race, it's not just about who launches first, but about who bets correctly on the future regulatory dialect and user risk preferences.

The Suspense and Opportunities in the Tokenized Stock Track

Returning to the narrative of "Base catching up to Robinhood," it feels more like a long-distance race just starting rather than a sprint to the finish. Robinhood provided the derivatives path earlier in the EVM environment, while Base and Coinbase released the direction of "1:1 full asset backing," but as of July 21, 2026, both sides remain at the stage of scheme contestation and market expectations: regarding the Base side, there is no clear launch timetable in the public information, nor visibility on which stocks will be covered, which specific trading entrance will carry them, and even the technical architecture and compliance framework exist in a state of "seeing direction but not details." More troublesome is that multiple Chinese media outlets densely quoted this X post on the same day, almost entirely relying on Jesse Pollak's single statement, with no additional primary disclosures or multi-source cross-verification. Under the premise that the research brief explicitly prohibits fabricating any specific launch dates, stock codes, trading volumes, or user data, it is challenging for outsiders to make substantiated judgments on product forms, rhythms, and risks in an information vacuum. This lack of transparency is a tangible variable for investors, developers, and potential partners.

However, because of this, the tokenized stock path, commonly viewed as a "bridge connecting traditional stock markets and the crypto world," retains a vast suspense space. On one hand, Robinhood's derivatives solution and Base/Coinbase's 1:1 spot backing solution will inevitably encounter feedback from their respective regulatory jurisdictions in the future; which model better aligns with regulatory risk preferences and how far each will be allowed to go currently has no conclusive evidence. On the other hand, with leading internet brokerages, public chains, custodial institutions, and possibly traditional exchanges likely to join the fray, this track is hard to be early locked down as a "two-person show of Robinhood against Base," but rather resembles an experimental arena for the deep integration of traditional finance and crypto. Standing on this cross-section of July 21, 2026, what the market can determine is that tokenized stocks have become a direction that must be taken seriously, and what truly determines victory or defeat may not be who announces a concept first, but who provides answers that withstand the test of time along the axes of regulation, technology, and trust.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin Exclusive Hyperliquid Benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin Exclusive Aster Benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin On-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。