Around July 20, 2026, the landscape of currencies and computing power in Asia was rewritten in just a few days: on one side, South Korea was preparing to define the issuance and circulation lines for "on-chain currency priced in won" under the "Digital Assets Basic Law", alongside the second phase of the Han River Project which will launch real trading tests of deposit tokens in September, with the number of participating banks increasing from 7 to 9, and adding features such as peer-to-peer transfers and biometrics, forming a dual-track path for the parallel advancement of the legal tender token and central bank digital currency; on the other side, Hong Kong, led by Standard Chartered, was planning to launch the HKDAP token pegged to the Hong Kong dollar on the blockchain as early as the end of this month, placing it within the local framework for regulating tokenized assets being built alongside the Hong Kong dollar chain, attempting to extend the old system pegged to the US dollar into a new channel of "Hong Kong dollar on-chain". At almost the same point in time, SK Group's Choi Tae-won forecast that demand for AI chips next year would surge by 60%–100% compared to this year, and overall semiconductor demand would rise by at least 50%–60%, while new supply would be "almost zero". TSMC then announced an additional investment of around $100 billion in the US, bringing its total investment to about $265 billion. Southbound two-times leveraged products for SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics on the Hong Kong stock market opened with an increase of about 15%, all these signals collectively point to: the global computing power and capital expenditure entering a high-pressure upward cycle, and the high beta exposure of risk assets becoming enticing again. In this emotional wave, on-chain gambler gud.hl staked about $1.23 million, betting everything at a 10% odd on Argentina winning the 2026 World Cup, ultimately losing it all; this extreme bet reflects traditional market leveraged semiconductor products, showcasing the same high volatility, weak constraint risk culture. In such an environment, the accelerated implementation of legal tender tokens and CBDCs in Asia has altered the dominance of "stateless US dollars" on-chain, while the AI chip and semiconductor cycle has heightened the overall risk appetite for technology and crypto assets, and on-chain gambling examples remind funds that this upward cycle leans more towards short-term games: BTC is being repriced as a macro asset of global liquidity and computing power cycles, ETH is viewed as a technical beta of the new generation of on-chain legal tender and tokenized asset infrastructure, and on-chain funds are more likely to switch back and forth between Korean won, Hong Kong dollar legal tender tokens, and mainstream leading currencies, while pursuing high volatility returns, partially moving long-term capital from US dollar-denominated instruments towards Asian currencies and Ethereum ecosystem-related structural positions.

Korean Won Legal Tender Token Begins: Will Local Funds Decouple from the Dollar?

Under the framework of the "Digital Assets Basic Law", the Financial Services Commission of Korea and the Bank of Korea are simultaneously advancing the rule design for the won-denominated legal tender token, essentially building a legal shell for "on-chain won" that can be accepted by traditional finance. The intention is clear: first, to bring the Korean won onto an open channel to facilitate cross-border settlements and asset trading, and second, to promote the internationalization of the won, reducing reliance on a single dollar denomination at the regional funding level. However, the constraints are equally evident—the specific provisions and effective dates have not yet been made public, which means that banks, payment institutions, and potential issuers can only explore layouts under policy expectations, and genuine large-scale issuance and external expansion will still have to wait for regulatory guidance on capital requirements, reserve management, and cross-border usage boundaries; this timing discrepancy will determine the pace of the Korean won's on-chain advancement and the release speed of risk appetite.

In parallel with legislative expectations, the second phase of the Han River Project is scheduled to begin real trading tests of deposit tokens as soon as September, with the number of participating banks growing from 7 to 9, and the testing scenarios expanding to peer-to-peer transfers and biometric authentication, indicating that "tokenized deposits" are moving from a closed pilot to an environment closer to real retail and enterprise payments. For the domestic banking system, this is a migration of accounting formats: as more payments are completed on blockchain infrastructure, the digitalization of the won extends from the central bank wholesale level to commercial banks; in the future, as long as regulatory permission is granted, this set of account and KYC systems can naturally connect to on-site and off-site crypto trading interfaces. Once compliant on-chain Korean won tokens are formed, South Korean exchanges, OTC desks, and market makers will have the conditions to directly quote BTC/ETH in terms of the Korean won, rewriting the previously necessary funding flow that had to pivot through USDT and other US dollar-denominated tokens into a closed loop of "Korean won → on-chain Korean won → crypto assets"; under the dual-track framework of CBDCs and legal tender tokens, the trading pairs of BTC/ETH in Korean won and the yield curve of on-chain assets priced in Korean won will have the opportunity to be restructured, while the real reformation of trading structures will depend on whether the Korean legal tender token and CBDC can open up the funding circuit between the on-chain and interbank markets within the regulatory tolerance.

Hong Kong Dollar HKDAP Debuts: An On-Chain Hong Kong Dollar Settlement Channel Opens

Almost at the same time that the dual-track experiment of the Korean won legal tender token and central bank digital currency was launched, Hong Kong chose to put traditional banks in the spotlight. Led by Standard Chartered (Hong Kong), Dingdian Finance plans to introduce the Hong Kong dollar pegged token HKDAP by the end of this month at the earliest, transitioning the path of "Hong Kong dollar → Hong Kong dollar pegged token → on-chain assets" from concept to physical implementation. HKDAP is clearly defined as a compliant on-chain tool for the Hong Kong dollar, but specific issuance scales and reserve asset arrangements have yet to be disclosed, indicating it is both a stress test for the regulatory framework being constructed for tokenization in Hong Kong and an extension of Hong Kong's long-standing peg to the US dollar: the Hong Kong dollar is no longer only hedging against the US dollar in the offshore interbank market but is also beginning to compete directly for settlement rights against US dollar-denominated settling tokens on-chain.

For local banks, OTC, and trading platforms in Hong Kong, the compliant Hong Kong dollar pegged token primarily changes the friction costs at the settlement level. In the past, institutions had to convert Hong Kong dollar funds into the crypto market often through US dollar-denominated tokens. If HKDAP is truly embedded within the banking system and compliant custodianship, Hong Kong dollar funds could create a shorter closed loop between local accounts and on-chain accounts. Consequently, the overnight trading of BTC/ETH in Hong Kong time is expected to gain deeper liquidity based on the Hong Kong dollar, and trading platforms can naturally expand to offer spot, perpetual, and yield products priced in HKDAP, while market makers will reconstruct arbitrage paths around the price differences between "Hong Kong dollar pegged token - US dollar denominated token - legal Hong Kong dollar". On a larger regional scale, the Hong Kong dollar pegged token will directly face competition from US dollar-denominated tokens and compliant tokens from places like Singapore—its ability to genuinely divert Asian capital will depend on whether the issuance scale, regulatory exemptions, and cross-border usage scenarios can support a sufficiently large on-chain Hong Kong dollar funding pool, and the thickness of this funding pool will ultimately reflect in the depth of BTC/ETH trading priced in Hong Kong dollars and the volatility structure of the overnight market.

AI Chip Supply Not Meeting Demand: Capital Overflowing to Semiconductors and Computing Power

While the on-chain conversion of the Hong Kong dollar has just opened a new funding channel, another global risk mainline has quietly taken shape: a shortage of computing power. SK Group's Chairman Choi Tae-won expects that demand in the AI field will surge around 60%–100% next year compared to this year, with overall semiconductor product demand also increasing by at least 50%–60%, while the new supply next year will be "almost zero," resulting in "chaos" in the storage market. This is not merely a judgment on industry prosperity; it is telling capital: over the next two years, computing power and storage will be the global constraint conditions, and whoever can secure chips will dominate pricing power. Echoing this is TSMC's expansion plan in the US—adding around $100 billion, bringing the total investment scale in the US to about $265 billion, planning to build multiple wafer fabrication and packaging facilities, directly connecting with AI chip demand, and hedging against Intel, Musk’s Terafab, and geopolitical risks. At the macro variables level, this is a rare supercycle of semiconductor capital expenditure that has turned "computing power prices" into a new global risk factor.

The feedback from the capital markets has been almost instantaneous. In the Hong Kong stock market, Southbound two-times leveraged products for SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics have recently surged by about 15% at the opening; funds are willing to pay a leveraged premium to gain high beta exposure to storage and AI chips. Global semiconductor and computing power assets are being chased by funds, re-igniting the sentiment in the high-volatility technology sector, with risk appetite shifting from defensive to offensive. The next station along this link is the "AI + on-chain" narrative: when computing power is regarded as a scarce asset, any token that can narrate computing power, or any public chain capable of carrying AI transactions and capital cycles, will be viewed as a distant beneficiary of semiconductor prosperity, while BTC/ETH continue to serve as the foundational collateral and macro beta tools in this risk chain. In the short term, the combination of AI chip shortages and massive capital expenditures is elevating global risk appetite and, through the linkage with technology stocks and AI concept assets, pushing more high-volatility funds into the crypto market, while the pricing of computing power and the pace of semiconductor expansion will determine the intensity and duration of this round of risk assets.

Double Leveraged Hong Kong Stocks Skyrocket and On-Chain Gambling Liquidations

When semiconductors are ignited by the AI narrative, the first to become euphoric in traditional markets are often those willing to double their stakes. At the opening of the Hong Kong stock market, Southbound two-times leveraged products for SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics both surged by about 15%; these products themselves are tools that add an extra layer of leverage on top of original chip volatility. Funds are betting on the price differences brought by the "chaos" in the storage market while amplifying return expectations with high beta products. Risk appetite is no longer simply about accumulating tech stocks but shows a willingness to place directional bets at extreme positions. This sentiment will not remain contained within the Hong Kong stock market; instead, it flows through account systems and cross-market liquidity pools into perpetual contracts, synthetic indices, and on-chain derivatives in the crypto world.

The on-chain gambler gud.hl serves as another facet of this cyclical mentality. He staked about $1.23 million on a World Cup themed contract, betting on Argentina to win the 2026 World Cup, with only about a 10% odds; if he won, he could recover around $12.35 million, but he ultimately lost everything. The logic here is not traditional sports investment but a typical "tenfold dream" position: using a large principal to gamble on a very low probability high return, while the contract itself and surrounding derivative tools lack appropriate suitability management and risk disclosure. More critically, this type of on-chain gambling and high-leverage derivatives in the crypto ecosystem often share the same batch of collateral and margin pools. When the tenfold fantasy collapses at the World Cup betting lines, the losses do not stop at one address but, through margin replenishment, liquidating collateral assets, and withdrawing liquidity, indirectly crush part of the BTC/ETH long positions, amplifying the chain reaction of liquidations across the entire risk asset chain. In this cycle, the concurrent rising of peripheral speculation and on-chain gambling essentially represents two ends of the same leveraged chain, determining how much passive selling pressure and tail volatility BTC/ETH will endure when sentiment reverses.

From Legal Tender Tokens to the AI Boom: How Funds Move in BTC/ETH

As this leveraged chain extends from sports betting to legal tender tokens and AI concepts, the funding environment surrounding BTC/ETH has quietly changed. Under the "Digital Assets Basic Law", South Korea has defined the regulatory boundaries for the won-denominated legal tender token while promoting the second phase of the "Han River Project", allowing bank deposit tokens to enter real trading tests; Hong Kong, on the other hand, is leading the launch of the Hong Kong dollar pegged token HKDAP through Standard Chartered, and integrating it within the existing Hong Kong dollar and US dollar fixed exchange rate system under the framework of tokenized assets. The result is that the on-chain settlement paths for local legal entities and retail investors in Asia will be re-routed: regional payments, off-exchange settlements, and exchange margin begin weighing between the won, Hong Kong dollar tokens, and US dollar-denominated tokens, with US dollar-pegged tokens no longer being the sole liquidity hub. Over time, the pricing structure of BTC/ETH spot and contracts may shift from a "single dollar" model to a "dollar + won + Hong Kong dollar" multipolar configuration, with funds switching back and forth between different legal tender tokens, changing the previous one-way dependence on US dollar liquidity in the Asian market.

Simultaneously occurring with this settlement layer reconstruction is the high prosperity cycle of AI chips and semiconductors raising the global risk appetite. SK Group expects that next year's AI demand will explode by 60%–100% compared to this year, with overall semiconductor demand increasing by 50%–60%, while new supply is almost nonexistent; TSMC's additional $100 billion investment in the US brings its total investment to around $265 billion, and the products betting on SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics in Hong Kong stocks directly surged by about 15% in the opening phase, indicating that funds are willing to pay a higher volatility price for computing power and high beta tech stories. Historically, the phase correlations between BTC/ETH and the NASDAQ, semiconductor index often rise in an environment where "capital expenditure + high-leverage products increase" together, viewing on-chain chips as an extension of technology risk assets. Key indicators worth monitoring next are: whether the proportion of BTC/ETH settled in Korean won and Hong Kong dollar tokens beyond US dollar-denominated tokens continues to expand; whether the role of Korean won and Hong Kong dollar on-chain tokens in Asian exchange margins and cross-border payments increases; whether the rolling correlation coefficients of BTC/ETH to NASDAQ and semiconductor index yield amplify during periods of sharp rises and falls in the AI sector; and whether the scale of on-chain high-risk speculative activities and contract leverage significantly increases following these macro pulses. As long as legal tender tokens diversify, AI assets oscillate at high levels, and on-chain gambling and high-leverage derivatives push total system leverage higher together, any sentiment reversal could turn correlations from “positive linkage” into “simultaneous stampedes.” For participants, the true focus should be on the extent of correlation shocks and cumulative leverage risks that BTC/ETH will bear when these funding chains rise or reverse simultaneously.

Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。