A news about selling garbage, a tweet from Hayden, which eventually turned into a cryptocurrency with a market value of a million on the Robinhood Chain.
This situation is quite typical in the crypto circle and also very RWA.
The incident started when someone made small cubes of garbage near Taylor Swift's wedding, selling for $25 each, all sold out in 24 hours.
After seeing this, Hayden exclaimed:
If it were tokenized into RWA, it should be able to earn more.
Then someone actually turned this statement into a cryptocurrency:
$TRASH.
Initially, I thought this was just another ordinary token trying to ride Hayden's popularity.
But after thoroughly investigating on-chain, I found that:
The TRASH token itself is not that complex; what is really interesting is its launch method.
It didn't follow the usual Bonding Curve but used Uniswap's new Liquidity Launcher + CCA Continuous Clearing Auctions.
It sounds like a thesis defense; translated into plain language, it means:
Ordinary Bonding Curves are like escalators.
The earlier you board, the lower the price; the later you board, the higher the price.
CCA is more like an on-chain auction.
Everyone submits the maximum price they are willing to pay, the system releases the goods while calculating prices based on demand, and ultimately settles according to the clearing logic, with excess funds refunded.
The total supply of TRASH is 1 billion.
Half of it was auctioned off, while the other half was kept and combined automatically with the ETH raised from the auction to form a Uniswap V4 liquidity pool.
Issuing tokens, auctioning, pricing, and building the pool are all completed automatically.
Theoretically, this is fairer than "whoever gets in first pays the least."
But, note the 'but.'
The TRASH auction only lasted about 53 seconds.
Only 8 addresses and 10 bids actually participated.
The first two addresses took 56.8% of the auction share, while the top four took 79.3%.
What does this resemble?
It’s like a mall announcing a 90% discount, with the doors indeed open to everyone.
But it only operates for 53 seconds.
By the time the average person ties their shoelaces, the bots have already paid, generated invoices, and claimed the parking tickets.
Thus, this mechanism is publicly available at the contract level, but being public does not equate to being equitable, nor does it mean that ordinary people truly have an equal opportunity to participate.
The good news is that the TRASH token contract itself is relatively clean:
No minting;
No trading tax;
No blacklist;
No suspension;
And the Owner cannot change the rules at any time.
The main LP is also locked for one year, so it cannot be withdrawn directly in the short term.
But there is an easily overlooked detail here:
The LP is not automatically permanently locked at launch.
About 24 minutes after the pool was built, the issuer deployed a lock contract and transferred the LP NFT into it.
Moreover, only the LP principal is locked, not the fees.
The main pool fee rate is 1%.
The issuer can withdraw the ETH and TRASH fees generated from transactions at any time.
I compiled some statistics:
From the first withdrawal to when I researched, about 8.5 hours passed, and the issuing wallet had received transaction fees a total of 23 times.
Accumulated approximately:
14.2 ETH
40.96 million TRASH
The withdrawn TRASH was subsequently sold or transferred through aggregators, and the current direct balance of TRASH in the issuing wallet is now 0.
This is not called drawing from the LP.
But the economic structure must be understood.
It’s more like:
The road has been locked, and cannot be dismantled.
But the toll booth is still there.
Everyone buying and selling TRASH has to pay a 1% toll; the fees mainly flow to the issuer who holds the LP position.
The hotter the trading, the more the issuer earns.
However, token holders do not receive fee sharing, buybacks, burns, or any product revenue return.
So, two things must be separated:
The mechanism is real,
But that does not mean the token captures value.
The LP is locked,
But that does not mean the issuer cannot continue to profit and sell tokens.
Using Uniswap's official infrastructure,
Does not mean TRASH is an official Uniswap token.
Citing Hayden's tweet,
Does not mean Hayden endorsed this CA.
TRASH currently has no official website, no products, no team identification, and no token utility.
Its real value comes from three things:
Hayden's RWA garbage meme;
The early attention of the Robinhood Chain;
And the market's curiosity about Uniswap's new launch mechanism.
When I researched, TRASH had a market capitalization of about $1.18 million, liquidity of about $196,000, with over $6.2 million traded in 24 hours, around 2,410 holders.
The market is indeed not empty.
But at that time, the price had already reached about 116 times the auction clearing price.
This means that what you are buying now is no longer "participating in the early auction."
Instead, it is re-pricing based on the new mechanism, hot narratives, and secondary market emotions.
So my view on TRASH is:
The mechanism is worth studying, the token is worth observing, but don't rush to deify it.
What I really want to see is not whether it can pull up again, but:
Can CCA make the token issuance fairer, or just more efficient for bots to snatch?
After the issuer continues to receive transaction fees, can the market still absorb this selling pressure?
Can a joke tweet from Hayden turn into a meme that continuously produces content?
If these questions can be resolved, TRASH might become a representative sample of the new launch mechanism of Robinhood Chain.
If they cannot be resolved, it is a very successful:
Hotspot capture + rapid auction + fee realization.
The most magical part of this circle is:
Garbage can be RWA,
Attention can be tokenized,
But fees will not automatically be distributed to token holders.
The above is my personal understanding; everyone DYOR.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
