The Hidden Winner of the World Cup

As one of the most highly publicized sporting events in human history, the World Cup has always been more than just a game.

It is more like a timely activated attention machine. Matches, broadcasts, advertisements, social media discussions, pre-match predictions, and post-match controversies all get swept into the same narrative space in a short time. The LED screens at the sidelines may seem like mere background, yet they can be repeatedly brought to the global audience's attention with each attack, replay, and slow-motion highlight.

This year, a name that had not been commonly mentioned by regular users appeared in this ad space: ADI PredictStreet.

Image from: ADI PredictStreet's World Cup sideline advertisement

This is an interesting lead.

Because what appears here is not Polymarket, which has already established mindshare among prediction market users. As early as April of this year, ADI PredictStreet reached a multi-year partnership with FIFA, becoming the official prediction market partner for FIFA World Cup 2026 as a tier-one collaborator.

Another prediction market star project, Kalshi, later even completed a simultaneous display with ADI PredictStreet, but this partnership wasn't a direct relationship with FIFA. According to Bloomberg's report, for this joint brand collaboration, Kalshi paid $20 million to ADI.

This means that ADI is the more hidden winner of this World Cup prediction market narrative.

For no other reason than that it stood first at the entry point for the prediction market of the world's largest sporting event.

And behind this entry point connects to ADI Chain.

A Chain Starting from the Background

Unlike the chains commonly known to the public, ADI Chain's positioning is somewhat different.

It is not a chain built around a single application, nor is it merely a trading venue for crypto users. From the very beginning, it targeted governments, banks, financial institutions, and enterprise-level applications, attempting to undertake stablecoin settlement, tokenization of real-world assets, payment networks, and institutional asset infrastructure.

In recent years, the common path for new public chains has often started from within crypto: first building a developer ecosystem, then attracting DeFi, NFT, meme, airdrops, and rewards, demonstrating market viability through TVL, trading volume, and daily active users, before approaching the institutional world.

This path is now facing increasingly obvious pressures.

The activity of a public chain largely depends on the activity of assets, and a chain's ability to continuously produce new assets, new narratives, and new trading reasons is limited. After the meme craze fades, trading volume will decline; users will leave after airdrop expectations end; even foundational networks like Ethereum face long-term tug-of-war between application growth and asset activity.

ETH network fees fluctuate significantly with asset cycles on-chain, data from: DeFiLlama

ADI Chain's path is more like the opposite.

It does not first create a round of asset hype on-chain, then wait for capital and institutions to come in; it attempts to move already existing financial activities onto the chain: the issuance and settlement of stablecoins, tokenization of real assets, custody and circulation of institutional assets, and the movement of funds within payment networks.

This path is clearest in the context of stablecoins.

The best representation of ADI Chain's path is not the $USDT or $USDC aimed at global crypto user liquidity, but the $DDSC which is more geographically and institutionally oriented.

$DDSC is a stablecoin pegged to the dirham, connected to FAB, IHC, ADQ, and the Central Bank of the UAE's authorized framework. It does not serve generic trading scenarios but rather payment, settlement, and institutional fund circulation within the local financial system of the UAE.

A recent public large transaction occurred in May.

IHC indicated in an Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange disclosure document that it completed a transaction of 110 million dirhams, approximately 30 million dollars, via $DDSC on the ADI Chain. The disclosure document stated:

• This is one of the largest single stablecoin transactions in the region.

The same choice also appears with $PUSD.

This stablecoin issued by Palm Azgar Finance highlights not trading liquidity but compliance with Islamic law. According to reports, $PUSD targets corporate treasury departments, exchanges, and payment processing institutions, with a circulation of approximately 2.3 billion dollars, aimed at the Islamic finance system, which is over 3 trillion dollars in size.

By now, ADI Chain's first-layer path is already clear: first, bring in the settlement demands from the regional financial system.

$DDSC corresponds to the flow of local institutional funds in the UAE, while $PUSD corresponds to the larger Islamic financial market. They do not address the question of whether there are stablecoins on-chain, but rather whether the money in regional finance can be brought onto the chain in a way acceptable to institutions.

This is also the prerequisite for the subsequent establishment of payment networks. Whether it's the Mastercard collaboration for cross-border payments in the Middle East, or M-Pesa covering 8 markets in Africa with over 60 million monthly active users, what is genuinely needed is not another on-chain asset but a foundational network that can undertake settlement and the movement of funds.

Once the money comes in and flows, the next step is assets.

From Regional Settlements to Institutional Assets

However, ADI Chain's layout is certainly not limited to the Middle East.

If $DDSC and $PUSD demonstrate its penetration into regional financial systems, then international institutions and infrastructure service providers such as BlackRock, Franklin Templeton, BNY Mellon, and SettleMint represent another line: how global assets can enter this on-chain financial network.

This matter inevitably involves custody.

In May, BNY Mellon announced a partnership with Finstreet and ADI Foundation to provide institutional-grade digital asset custody within ADGM, extending to ADI Chain. For institutional assets, custody is not just a supporting service but the very entry point. If assets are not held in compliance, there will be no subsequent issuance, trading, or settlement.

Source: Official press release

After custody, the focus turns to issuance.

The collaboration between ADI Foundation and SettleMint falls within the realm of digital securities. SettleMint is an institutional tokenization infrastructure service provider, with the collaboration occurring under the ADGM framework. In other words, what ADI is aiming for is not a packaged RWA product but the regulated process of digital securities.

Moving outward, we find asset management institutions.

BlackRock and Franklin Templeton appearing here do not only add two well-known names. If RWAs rely solely on on-chain protocols to package assets, it will quickly reach a dead end. The entities that can genuinely bring assets in are still traditional asset managers, custodians, issuance tools, and settlement networks.

Putting these lines together establishes the asset narrative of ADI Chain.

It does not first write a label called "RWA" and then stuff partners into it. It starts from the toughest entry point for assets into the financial system: where to hold them, who will issue them, who will manage them, and finally, which network they will circulate through.

When Real Financial Becomes On-Chain Costs

Here, the puzzle of ADI's resources has basically unfolded.

World Cup entry, regional stablecoins, institutional custody, digital securities infrastructure, and asset management institutions may seem to belong to different businesses, but they ultimately point to the same question: can they be continuously integrated into the ADI Chain network.

This is the position of $ADI.

It is not a token serving a specific application, nor is it an accessory of a certain type of asset. The value of $ADI depends on whether ADI Chain can organize these entry points, funds, and assets into a consistently running ecosystem.

If these collaborations are merely independent progressions, $ADI will only gain associative narratives; if they truly occur on the same chain for trading, settlement, and asset circulation, what $ADI undertakes will be the underlying fuel that the ADI ecosystem repeatedly traverses during operation.

This is also where ADI Chain's path differs from many public chains.

It does not first create a round of asset hype on-chain and then wait for external funds to flow in; it attempts to first bring the money, assets, and transaction processes that already exist in real finance onto the chain and then allow these flows to support the use cases of $ADI.

The World Cup merely pushes ADI to the forefront.

What truly determines the value of $ADI is whether these visible entry points can continue to bring funds, assets, and transactions back to ADI Chain.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。