Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Asher (@Asher_ 0210)

Yesterday, Portugal lost 0-1 to Spain in the Round of 16 of the 2026 World Cup. In stoppage time, Merino scored a header that kept 41-year-old Cristiano Ronaldo and Portugal out of the quarter-finals. Before the match, Ronaldo had just confirmed that this would be his last World Cup; after the match, he stood on the field, applauding the fans, wiping his eyes, and embracing young Spanish player Yamal.

"Goodbye youth! 41-year-old Ronaldo shed tears on the field after the match, ending his last World Cup in the Round of 16." Such headlines flooded media and social platforms. For most people, Ronaldo crying is almost without dispute.

Ronaldo covering his face after the match, visibly emotional

However, according to Polymarket's settlement rules, "Ronaldo cried" does not necessarily count.

Was Ronaldo crying, assessed frame by frame by the market

For Polymarket, where everything can be predicted, this World Cup naturally features Ronaldo prominently. Long before the match started, the platform launched a prediction event—"Will Ronaldo cry at this World Cup" (link: https://polymarket.com/event/will-ronaldo-cry-at-the-world-cup-20260604013616610).

By common sense, Ronaldo's teary-eyed scene after Portugal's exit has already given a clear answer. But on Polymarket, media reports and audience feelings are not enough; it ultimately comes back to the rules themselves.

According to Polymarket's settlement rules for this event, only when clear photos or videos show distinguishable tears on Ronaldo's face will it count as Yes; crying must occur on the field or bench area, while locker rooms, corridors, and other areas do not count; merely showing emotional agitation, bloodshot eyes, wiping eyes, or teary eyes may not necessarily count.

Polymarket's settlement details for "Will Ronaldo cry at this World Cup"

Thus, the controversy quickly shifted from "Did Ronaldo cry?" to "Does this drop of water count as tears?"

Some believe that the photos and videos are clear enough, confirming that there are tear marks on Ronaldo's face; others insist that it might just be sweat, light reflection, or water remnants from after the game. The field is not a suitable place for "tear verification," as sweat, camera cuts, and light reflections complicate the assessment.

Discussion among Polymarket traders about whether Ronaldo cried

This is not the first time Polymarket has been stalled by defined rules. Similar events, such as "Does a partial government shutdown count as a shutdown," have sparked disputes among traders due to gray areas between real situations and market rules. This time, the controversy revolves around the water mark on Ronaldo's face.

As a result, the event failed to pass settlement twice yesterday and entered a dispute phase. As the debate intensified, the Yes probability fell below 20% at one point.

The "Will Ronaldo cry at this World Cup" event faced disputes after two failed settlements

At this stage, the market price reflects not just whether Ronaldo shed tears, but traders' bets on rule interpretations, evidence quality, and final arbitration outcomes. Based on past experiences with contested markets on Polymarket, once an event enters a phase of nitpicking rules and evidence, the final outcome often deviates from public intuition.

A clarification brings a major reversal

Just as Yes holders was almost certain their positions would go to zero, Polymarket's official update this morning on supplementary rules instantly reversed the previously No-leaning situation.

The supplementary rules explicitly stated, "As of the time this clarification is published, there is already qualifying photo and video evidence that was captured on the field after the match between Portugal and Spain, showing Cristiano Ronaldo in tears, including clear tears on his face."

Polymarket's updated supplementary settlement rules this morning

In other words, for this contentious event, Polymarket officially provided a clear stance: the water mark on Ronaldo's face counts as tears. Market sentiment quickly reversed, with the previously dipping Yes probability that fell below 20% rapidly surging to above 99%, and the total trading volume for the event exceeding $22 million.

After the release of the supplementary rules, the probability of "Ronaldo will cry at this World Cup" briefly surged to 99%

This controversy market, following the announcement of the Polymarket team’s supplementary explanation, ultimately saw a reversal. More importantly, this clarification sent a signal—under the premise that there is still reasonable interpretative space in the rules themselves, the Polymarket team seems more willing to align the results with public perception, rather than allowing the market to be skewed by "nitpicking" players.

In many previous controversial markets on Polymarket, final results often depended on who could better exploit loopholes, or who could find favorable interpretations in ambiguous areas. But this time, the on-site footage, media reports, and supplementary evidence all pointed to Ronaldo indeed shedding tears, and the official did not allow the debate over "sweat or tears" to continue dominating the settlement outcome.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。