Recently, under the backdrop of Strategy continuously selling BTC and the market sentiment leaning towards caution and even pessimism, a set of completely contrary bets emerged on-chain: three whale addresses 0x15a4, 0x7fba, and 0xe069 concentrated high-leverage BTC and ETH longs almost simultaneously. Public monitoring data shows that 0x15a4 went long 1,000 BTC with about 40x leverage, with a nominal value of approximately $63.8 million; 0x7fba bet on 30,627 ETH with about 10x leverage, with a nominal value of approximately $54.9 million; and 0xe069 went long 470.4 BTC with about 20x leverage, with a nominal value close to $30 million. The total nominal value of these three positions exceeds $140 million. Against the backdrop of institutional continuous reduction in BTC holdings, they chose to go long against the trend with 10-40x leverage, which is extremely eye-catching both in terms of risk exposure and signal significance. It is currently impossible to confirm the relationship and specific motives between the three addresses on-chain, but it is certain that amidst the confrontational situation of Strategy selling and giant whales increasing leverage to hedge, the divergence between bulls and bears has escalated into a high-risk gamble, and whether this bet will ultimately be seen as “smart money” or a typical negative case will depend on subsequent price evolution and whether these positions can safely traverse the volatility range.
Three Addresses' Gambit of $140 Million Leverage BTC ETH Longs
Looking specifically, this gamble is not a vague “large position,” but rather three distinctly different leveraged bets. Address 0x15a4 chose the most aggressive route: going long 1,000 BTC with about 40x leverage, with a nominal value of about $63.8 million, which in the current environment is almost a purely directional bet with “minimal margin for error.” On the other side, address 0xe069 also bets on BTC, but reduced leverage to about 20x, with only 470.4 BTC scaled up to about $30 million nominal value, finding a relatively balanced point between risk and flexibility. Meanwhile, address 0x7fba put its chips on ETH, going long 30,627 ETH with about 10x leverage, with a nominal value of approximately $54.9 million. This has the lowest leverage multiple among the three but sustains the same large directional exposure with a greater underlying coin quantity.
The total nominal value of these three positions exceeds $140 million, all pointing towards bullish long positions in BTC and ETH: there is a high-stakes 40x BTC gamble, a moderately enlarged 20x BTC position, and a more gently leveraged 10x ETH layout, all betting towards a single narrative that “the future will still rise” amidst the same round of downward selling pressure. Since public data has not disclosed specific margin sizes and liquidation prices yet, these three risk preferences can only be inferred from the leverage multiples and nominal value profiles, but the scale is sufficient to form a visible “bullish beacon” on-chain, becoming a key narrative node around which market discussions about “who is right” revolve amidst the pessimistic backdrop of Strategy's continuous selling.
Counter-Bets Under Strategy's Selling Pressure
On a more macro narrative level, as Strategy continues to sell BTC, it has been seen by the market as an important source of selling pressure, repeatedly testing the willingness to hold prices. Mainstream sentiment has shifted from “buying the dip” to “wait and see,” with caution and pessimism becoming the more common tone. Common sense suggests that in such an environment, reducing positions and shrinking risk exposures on the institutional side is a more “rational” choice, as most participants will subconsciously side with selling, handing chips over to time and lower prices.
However, on-chain, a completely opposite scene emerged: even before this round of selling pressure had been confirmed to end, the combined high-leverage BTC and ETH long positions exceeding $140 million from addresses 0x15a4, 0x7fba, and 0xe069 had already materialized, starkly contrasting with Strategy's reduction behavior. They chose to concentrate on increasing leverage at the stage of selling pressure and emotional lows, objectively betting that the current downturn is either nearing its end or has experienced some kind of “overshooting.” This judgment can currently only remain at the hypothetical level—materials have not proven any direct causality between the two sides, nor can it confirm any relationship between these addresses and any single institution. Yet, in the overlapping timeline of sellers and buyers, the divergence over “how far this downturn has actually gone” has been amplified into a confrontation where neither side can declare victory in advance.
Clearing Risks and Returns of High-Leverage Bulls
From 10x to 40x leverage, these three longs are running almost on the liquidation line. The 40x of 0x15a4 and the 20x of 0xe069 will see margins quickly eroded with just a few percentage points of decline in BTC. The seemingly “mild” 10x leverage on the position of 0x7fba with over 30,000 ETH is similarly at risk with slight price reverse fluctuations as it may push it close to a risk zone. The material did not provide specific margin sizes and liquidation prices, which can only be judged in general terms: 10-40x is all considered high-risk segments, and if the trend goes against the direction, the “speed of losses” far exceeds that of spot and low-leverage positions.
Looking at leverage from the perspective of nominal value makes it easier to understand the consequences of this gamble. The total long position exceeding $140 million, if faced with continuous reverse fluctuations in a short period, could easily lead to concentrated passive liquidations: if one address triggers liquidation, the BTC or ETH being sold could push the price down a bit further, further deteriorating the risk value of other high-leverage positions, dragging the market into a narrative of chain liquidations at extreme moments. Conversely, if the market moves in favor of the bulls, high leverage amplifies the returns—similar percentage rebounds can lead to disproportionately large jumps in profit for 40x or 20x positions compared to the margin. For these three addresses, this is a typical asymmetric game of risk and return: the downside is locked by margin, while the upside opens up with price and time, but whether this “asymmetry” ultimately translates into positive returns is still left to subsequent price movements and on-chain behaviors to answer.
Smart Money Signal or High-Risk Gamble
The market tends to interpret the actions of large whales as “smart money” because large addresses are often seen as having more complete information and more rigorous risk control: they are willing to take counter-trend actions when others are fearful, which itself has narrative tension. Against the backdrop of Strategy continuously selling BTC, according to AiCoin data, 0x15a4, 0x7fba, and 0xe069 reversed with a combined nominal value of over $140 million in high-leverage BTC and ETH longs, which could easily be packaged into a story of “institutions hedging against pessimism”—especially extreme leverages like 40x and 20x, which seem like bold bets with strong confidence in short-term volatility. However, beyond the allure, this “smart money” label in this case also has clear boundaries: the on-chain data has only exposed this opening action without supporting decision quality through historical trajectories, and there is no evidence to show that a single entity or a major institution stands behind these three addresses.
Therefore, these three positions could correspond to completely different narrative versions: they might be a typical attempt at bottom-hunting rebound, betting on excessively pessimistic emotions during the stage of Strategy's selling pressure; they might also just be a part of a larger asset portfolio, using high-leverage longs to hedge against other off-chain or on-chain positions; and it is also possible that they are just short-term speculations, entering and exiting quickly within preset intervals. Lacking a more complete on-chain behavioral profile—including past positions, rhythm of adding or reducing positions, historical liquidation records, and position structure—we cannot assess the long-term success rate of such addresses nor elevate a one-time bet to a “trend signal.” Until more capital pathways and subsequent position adjustment details appear, these high-leverage longs are more suitable as samples for observing divergences between bulls and bears and leverage risk exposures rather than being simply treated as a single answer for the next round of market conditions.
Next Up: Price Movements and On-Chain Actions to Watch
As Strategy continues to sell BTC, providing continuous selling pressure, the high-leverage long bets of 0x15a4, 0x7fba, and 0xe069 in BTC and ETH with 40x, 10x, and 20x leverage are themselves a typical game of divergence: on one side, institutions are reducing positions and locking in risks, while on the other, whales are betting on increases within high-leverage ranges. Currently, the materials have not provided actual gains or losses for these combined nominal value positions exceeding $140 million or if any partial liquidations have occurred. What we can see is merely a momentary risk exposure rather than a complete story. The two main lines to really watch next are: whether BTC and ETH's price movements continue to be pressured or reverse to strengthen; and whether the related addresses experience concentrated changes in on-chain additions, reductions, and liquidation records, especially in response to significant price fluctuations. The subsequent pace of Strategy's BTC disposals will also affect the market's judgments on medium to short-term trends. Lacking further quantitative indicators such as position structure and liquidation scale, this whale gamble seems more like a clear risk warning rather than a definitive bullish endorsement; investors should view it as an on-chain signal that needs continuous monitoring rather than a simple reason to follow.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
