The time has come to June 28, 2026, and the debate over whether Bitcoin's recent correction has found its "bottom" has been reignited. Jan3 CEO and high-frequency commentator in the Bitcoin space, Samson Mow, chose this moment to provide a strong conclusion—he explicitly stated in public that the bottom price for Bitcoin has arrived and further pointed out that the traditional halving cycle has not failed but has been "accelerated." Accompanying this judgment is another set of extreme data at the network level: According to Bitcoin News, Bitcoin mining difficulty recently surged to approximately 133.87 trillion, hitting a historical high, which means overall network computing power and miner investment are still at high levels, and beneath the price fluctuations, the underlying security and computing power supply have not significantly receded. Mining difficulty, as a lagging indicator, provides a fundamental background for the "bottom area" notion but has not quelled market divergence—views compiled by several cryptocurrency media outlets show a clear opposition among analysts regarding the future direction and pace; some lean toward embracing the new narrative of "the bottom has arrived, and the cycle has accelerated," while others remain skeptical about whether the traditional four-year cycle can still apply and whether the current phase is merely a rebound within a longer adjustment period. In such a mixed signal environment, Samson Mow's proclamation seems more like a starting gun, clearly posing the question: Is this wave of volatility the accelerated bottom of the cycle, or a collective illusion of the old cycle model? This has become the key variable in the current Bitcoin market debate.

New High Before Halving: Samson Mow's Bottom Declaration

With the traditional narrative of "four-year halving—new highs after halving" widely questioned, Jan3 CEO Samson Mow opted to base the judgment of "the bottom has arrived" directly on the premise that "the cycle has accelerated." The key sample he repeatedly emphasizes is that about 37 days before the upcoming halving in April 2024, Bitcoin had already reached a historical high at that time—historically, prices have often only hit their peak after the halving. In his view, this misalignment in the timing sequence is not noise, but rather illustrates that the market has preemptively realized some expectations in a shorter time frame before the halving, disrupting the traditional rhythm, thus the bottom would correspondingly shift to a position that the past model has not yet "marked."

Under this logic, Samson Mow proposes that "even if you believe in the cycle, you should derive the conclusion that the cycle has accelerated." This statement does not deny the halving cycle itself; rather, it demands that within the same cycle framework, one acknowledges that the time coordinates have undergone overall compression: the halving remains a focal point, but the price peaks and subsequent corrections and bottoming phases all shift forward relative to historical cases. Utilizing the halving narrative he has long advocated for, he views the recent peak 37 days before the halving as hard evidence of "cycle time compression," thus arriving at a conclusion starkly different from most conservative views: if one insists on using the old cycle to measure the current market, they must explain this anomalous sample; otherwise, they should accept the new time structure of "early bottom, accelerated cycle."

Disturbance or Early Realization of the Four-Year Cycle

Since the inception of Bitcoin, the roughly four-year block reward halving has been naturally abstracted by the market into a time framework of "halving—bull market—correction": the tightening supply growth before and after the halving is seen as a signal for market initiation; subsequently, prices would significantly rise over several quarters, leading to a long-cycle correction and bottoming phase. Based on multiple historical samples, the traditional cycle model solidifies this pattern into a "time coordinate system," which investors use to determine the switch between bullish and bearish markets, estimating roughly at which stage the tops and bottoms occur after the halving, rather than simply viewing the halving as a single positive event.

This round has exhibited a notable "misalignment" on this coordinate system: approximately 37 days before the April 2024 halving, Bitcoin has already achieved a historical high, representing the first instance within existing samples that a high point was reached before rather than after the halving. For cycle proponents, this is more akin to "early realization" than "cycle failure"—the halving remains the anchor point, yet price reactions to supply expectations and sentiment have been moved forward, compressing the structure originally concentrated in several quarters post-halving into a shorter period surrounding the halving. However, from a statistical perspective, an anomaly at a single time point is insufficient to upend the entire four-year cycle theory; whether this anomalous sample signifies an accelerated cycle or merely small sample noise still requires validation against more halving samples, price paths, and network data to arrive at a more compelling conclusion.

Mining Difficulty Hits New High: Confidence and Pressure Coexist

From an on-chain structural view, mining difficulty is one of Bitcoin's core security metrics, reflecting how much computational power needs to be invested across the network to find new blocks, in sync with actual online computing power under the targeted block time. Long-term experience indicates that rising difficulty tends to occur following an upward shift in price, as only under the premise of sufficiently substantial recent prices do miners have the motivation to add machines and electrical investment, thereby increasing overall computing power and difficulty. Thus, it is more an indirect transmission of "from price to mining," rather than a direct leading indicator of price.

According to Bitcoin News, after the halving, Bitcoin mining difficulty reached about 133.87 trillion at a certain time, setting a historical high, which means that even amid price fluctuations and repeated questioning of cycle narratives, overall network computing power and miner capital expenditure remain at high levels, indicating that expectations for the long-term sustainability and profitability of the network have not significantly cooled. In the framework of discussion regarding whether the bottom has been reached, this data indeed supports the viewpoint that "long-term logic remains intact": high difficulty corresponds to stronger safety margins and also suggests some collective bets by miners on future cash flows. However, it must be emphasized that difficulty adjustments are lagging and often respond to past weeks or even longer periods of price and investment decisions, potentially maintaining high levels near local tops and bottoms; under the coexistence of cost pressures and exit friction, miners will not immediately shut down or expand during each sharp price fluctuation. Therefore, the current peak in difficulty is more indicative of the robust state of the network's fundamentals, and is insufficient on its own to serve as an exact judgment tool for whether prices have bottomed out.

The Bottom Dispute: Analyst Consensus is Disintegrating

At a time when difficulty data struggles to provide a single conclusion, market attention has once again focused on human judgments, only to find that even this dimension has lost clear direction. Reports from cryptocurrency media like Golden Finance and BlockBeats prominently feature analysts' divergent views on Bitcoin's future: on one end are strong signals represented by Samson Mow, who clearly state that "the bottom has arrived" and "the cycle has accelerated," while on the other end are cautious voices that refuse to confirm the bottom and emphasize that the price path remains highly uncertain, even not ruling out the possibility of further declines. The reports do not highlight which side occupies the "mainstream," but repeatedly point to the same phenomenon—a lack of unified market expectations among even professional participants regarding the so-called "bottom area."

This disintegration of consensus forces the traditional halving—bull market—correction narrative and the new narratives of "accelerated cycles" and "leading signals" to coexist awkwardly: those who acknowledge Samson Mow's logic interpret the historical high before the halving and the current high difficulty as typical bottom signals under an accelerated cycle; those who remain cautious view the same set of facts as insufficient to overturn existing cyclical experiences, presenting fuzzy evidence. The result is that, during a phase potentially defined by history as a "critical interval," the market has not established a unified coordinate system for everyone to rely on; investors face not just short-term price fluctuations but a deeper uncertainty regarding whether the entire cycle framework remains credible.

Finding Space for Survival Between Noise and Signal

By putting together Samson Mow's declaration that "the bottom has arrived," the price path that set a historical high 37 days before the halving, and the fundamental data showing mining difficulty rising to approximately 133.87 trillion, we see three signals from different dimensions: the first is a narrative judgment based on cycle hypotheses, the second is an anomalous sample at the price and time sequence level, and the third is a structural indicator of on-chain computing power and security. Each is important, yet none can solely explain the entirety of current price behavior, nor can they provide an actionable "bottom" coordinate without specific price ranges and technical indicators. For investors, a more realistic path is not to bet solely on a single cyclical story or on a single on-chain indicator, but to construct a multidimensional framework that includes halving times, price behavior, mining difficulty, and market sentiment, to absorb and compare the contradictory evidence. When "cycle acceleration" representatives like Samson Mow and conservative figures draw starkly different conclusions from the same data set, it inherently illustrates that the market remains in a phase of narrative competition and price discovery; any labels of "has bottomed" or "has not bottomed" are merely temporary footnotes in this process rather than final judgments.

Join our community, let’s discuss, and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。