Many people believe that the ASTEROID on SOL and the ASTEROID on ETH have been arguing, which could damage both projects.
But the truth might be just the opposite.
It is precisely because of the arguments that the popularity of ASTEROID can continue to remain high within the circle.
Otherwise, many projects would ultimately be reduced to mere performances, pulling and smashing without discussion or remembrance.
So I have always thought that arguing is one of the most effective ways to gain attention.
Of course, it's not about meaningless petty quarrels.
Those that can sustain arguments often indicate that there are narratives, interests, factions, and identity recognition behind them.
Top memes are often spread not by "clarifying" but by controversy.
BTC and ETH argue.
SOL and ETH argue.
New assets and old assets argue.
The East and the West argue.
Communities and projects argue.
KOL and KOL argue.
Arguing itself is part of the attention market.
This is also why I have revisited $PROVE.
The Ansem wallet controversy is quite interesting.
A wallet that has been tracked by GMGN / Axiom / Kolscan for a long time, many people have always assumed it is Ansem's wallet, revolving around trading, reviewing, and copying work.
Then Ansem himself came out with the words:
“that's not my wallet lads”
This is very Prove It.
In the past, such matters were just mutual accusations on CT, and in the end, whoever had the louder voice won.
Now $PROVE has turned it directly into a Bounty:
If anyone can provide public evidence to prove whether this wallet belongs to Ansem, they can submit evidence to Pumpfun GO.
Yesterday this Bounty was very hot, and many people have started to submit materials.
Some people are looking from the GMGN tags.
Some are looking from the Pumpfun profile.
Some are looking from on-chain relationships.
There are also claims that it might point to another account.
But the most interesting thing right now is:
This matter has not yet been completely settled.
That is the key.
Because Prove It does not ask everyone to mindlessly take sides, but turns the noise, KOL controversies, and on-chain gossip into a process that can be publicly submitted, discussed, and judged.
In the past, arguing was just arguing.
Now arguing can become a Case.
A Case can turn into a Bounty.
A Bounty can attract evidence.
Evidence can lead to a judgment.
A judgment will continue to spread.
This is what I find interesting about $PROVE.
It is not simply about issuing tokens.
It is not simply about building a community.
It is also not about creating another voting website that nobody looks at.
What it aims to do is to productize attention itself.
Hot events → Submit Case → GO issue bounty → Community find evidence → Official judgment → Create new dissemination.
If this closed loop works, then all KOL provocations, project promises, on-chain genuine and fake wallets, profit screenshots, and trading achievements can be subjected to review.
Being stubborn is useless, Prove it.
Of course, as mentioned earlier, this project obviously has high control from the front row, and there are also issues with the DEV, so do not treat it as some perfect project.
What I am investing in is the idea and operational potential.
If it can continuously create such propagable Bounties, $PROVE will not just be a Meme, but a Meme court that can constantly attract CT attention.
Arguing is not scary.
What is scary is arguing for so long without anyone turning the controversy into a product.
Ansem wallet controversy Bounty:
https://pump.fun/go/aff13147-3f79-49fb-a6e4-8990ac8914f7
Still the same thing, I am betting on the idea, everyone do your own research.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
