Introduction

In recent cycles, I have increasingly leaned towards understanding the market from a structural perspective rather than a cyclical one.

Because often, what truly affects the long-term evolution of the industry is not a particular meeting, a rate cut, or quarterly data, but those slower, yet deeper changes.

Today's global high interest rate environment, in my view, is precisely this.

It represents a more fundamental reality: capital has a real opportunity cost again. When this happens, the entire industry needs to recalibrate its understanding of value, risk, and innovation.

Here are some of my observations and thoughts on this recalibration.

Core Insights

● The structural rise in global capital costs is fundamentally changing the valuation logic of crypto assets

● The market is shifting from narrative-driven to capital efficiency-driven: real revenue, real users, and verifiable business models are replacing the space held by stories

● Crypto ETFs mark the maturity of the industry, also signifying acceptance of mainstream capital market discipline

● The convergence of AI and crypto is a valuable long-term direction, but the market is accelerating the differentiation of true builders from labeling speculators

● As the integration of crypto and regulated financial systems deepens, privacy technology is gaining increasing strategic significance

● During this filtering period in the industry, the core responsibility of exchanges is shifting from providing channels to helping users truly understand the market

Narratives Used to Be the Answer, but Their Boundaries Have Changed

Looking back at past market cycles, I have a consistent observation: every liquidity easing window tends to give rise to a batch of assets that survive on narratives rather than fundamentals.

This has its inherent rationality in an environment where capital costs are close to zero. When risk-free assets offer almost no return, investors are willing to pay a premium for "future possibilities" — a compelling vision, an untested market opportunity, is sufficient to attract early capital. Where the product is, who the users are, and where the income comes from can be deferred to the "next round" of answers.

But when low-risk assets start to offer actual returns again, this logic encounters its own boundaries.

Capital doesn’t care whether the story is compelling. What capital cares about is whether the risk premium makes sense compared to more certain alternatives.

Based on my years of observation in this industry, projects with sustainable revenue, real users, and clear value propositions are gaining more stable capital support. In contrast, those depending on emotional cycles and lacking substantive demand are rapidly exposing their structural vulnerabilities in a high interest rate environment.

This is not pessimism. This is the market maturing.

The Next Cycle Rewards Verification, Not Imagination

Throughout the industry, I observe an increasingly consistent voice: practitioners who have experienced multiple cycles are using similar language to describe the same change — "Show me," has replaced "Tell me your vision."

This shift is real and structural.

In a narrative-driven environment, a project could secure funding with "next-generation public chains" or "DeFi new paradigms" without needing to demonstrate any operational data. In a capital efficiency-driven environment, these statements are no longer sufficient. The questions the market is now asking are more direct: Who are the users? Did they pay? Will they come back?

Notably, this does not mean that innovation has lost space. In my view, a high capital cost environment may actually have a net positive effect on the industry — it accelerates a filtering that should have happened long ago: distinguishing projects that genuinely solve real problems from those that consume liquidity yet lack substantive value narratives.

Projects that can answer those direct questions often go further than those that avoid them.

AI and Crypto: The Direction is Right, But Labels Do Not Equal Infrastructure

The integration of AI and crypto is a direction I continue to focus on in the medium to long term. But this field needs a clearer perspective.

I have observed the same pattern in every popular narrative cycle: projects that are genuinely building relevant infrastructure and those that borrow narrative labels but fundamentally still rely on emotional premiums are often hard to differentiate in the early stages. This is likewise true for the AI crypto space.

But the market filtering is underway. Some projects are starting to demonstrate verifiable usage and actual income, while others still primarily depend on narrative driving. This differentiation, in my view, is not coincidental — it is a signal that capital efficiency standards are beginning to take real effect.

In the long run, what is truly valuable in this field are those infrastructures driven by real demand behind them, not merely guided by market stories in front.

Privacy Infrastructure: An Undervalued Strategic Direction

There is one area that is relatively overlooked in the current market discussions, but I believe its strategic importance is being underestimated: privacy technology.

As crypto assets increasingly merge with regulated financial systems, privacy infrastructure is taking on increasingly critical functional roles. This is not an abstract technical proposition — it is the real demands faced by institutional capital entering the on-chain world, and it is the unavoidable technical pathway when seeking a balance between regulatory frameworks and on-chain transparency.

In my view, this is a direction where functional demand precedes market awareness. Its strategic value may not be fully reflected in market pricing for a long time. It deserves continuous observation.

Crypto ETFs: Joining the Mainstream Means Accepting Mainstream Discipline

Crypto ETFs are one of the clearest external signals of industry maturity. They bring broader participation channels, deeper institutional capital, and regulatory legitimacy to this asset class.

However, entering the mainstream capital market has always meant accepting the rules of the mainstream capital market.

As institutional funds hold crypto assets through ETFs, the pricing logic of this market is being more deeply embedded in the macro-financial system. Central bank policy shifts, global liquidity tightness and looseness, institutional risk rebalancing — these variables are increasingly influencing crypto price trends directly, rather than just existing as background noise.

Maturity has always come with responsibility. I believe this is not a cost but a necessary process for this industry to be taken seriously in the end.

Some Thoughts on the Role of Exchanges

I have said in public that the measure of success is not how many users there are, but whether they truly trust you and are willing to trade on your platform.

During the industry filtering period, this statement has taken on a more concrete meaning for me.

In the past, the core competitiveness of exchanges lay in speed and coverage. These remain important. But in my increasingly clear judgment, helping users truly understand market structure — understanding the sources of liquidity, understanding the nature of risk, understanding the relationship between macro background and asset pricing — is as important as providing trading channels, or even more fundamental.

The market filtering is happening. The rights of ordinary users to participate must be supported by genuine understanding and education, not just ensured by low-barrier entry.

Conclusion

In every market cycle I have experienced, there is a core question that is continuously being re-asked: What is worth the capital's risk?

In the low interest rate era, the threshold for this question was low because not taking risks was a cost in itself. In an era where capital again has a cost, this question has become serious — and more valuable.

High interest rates will not end this industry. They will complete a necessary filtering: compressing the premiums of inefficient narratives, exposing projects that lack substantive demand, and making those innovations that genuinely create value visible in a cleaner competitive environment.

Narratives helped build this industry. And verification may ultimately help it mature.

Capital is beginning to demand proof again. In the long run, this may be the healthiest change the crypto industry has gone through.

Disclaimer

This article represents the author's personal view and does not constitute any form of investment or financial advice. The crypto asset market is highly volatile and carries extremely high risks, and investors may lose all of their principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks before making any investment decisions and consult a licensed financial advisor if necessary. Past performance does not represent future returns. The data and market analysis quoted in this article are sourced from publicly verifiable third-party sources, and MEXC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness.

About the Author

Vugar Usi is currently the CEO of MEXC, responsible for leading the company’s global strategy, business growth, and long-term vision, committed to building a more open and inclusive digital asset ecosystem. Prior to joining MEXC, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of Bitget, where he led the platform's global operational expansion and user growth, bringing Bitget into the ranks of the top five crypto exchanges worldwide. Vugar has over 15 years of experience in marketing, branding, and communication strategies, having worked with leading global brands such as Carlsberg, Facebook, Coca-Cola, and Twitter. He holds a Master’s degree in Public Administration from Harvard University and serves as an advisor on minority issues to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。