Are you sure you understand the law?

First of all, I have never said that MSX is a fake pack fraud; I just questioned MSX about claiming to be compliant, so where are the compliance documents? They said their IPO is in collaboration with Republic, why did Republic email saying they have never collaborated with MSX?

May I ask who is challenging the legal bottom line?

Second, the public is reversing black and white; may I ask how I have reversed black and white? Alright, let's take a step back, even if I have reversed black and white, but MSX modifying the Merkle tree is not something I made up, right? A trading platform that fakes even the Merkle tree, what exactly am I reversing?

May I ask who is reversing black and white and committing fraud? May I ask who is challenging the legal bottom line?

Third, my qualities are indeed average, and my bottom line is not high, but I have never hidden my identity; my profile picture is of a real person, everyone knows my identity information, they know my name, and many people even know my address in Shanghai. If someone wants to sue me, I am ready to respond at any time.

But why is it that whether in China, the United States, or Singapore, or even Hong Kong, I have not seen a single MSX lawyer suing me? Is it because I am too handsome? Or is it because they know that their own hands are not clean?

May I ask who insists there is something that does not exist? May I ask who dares not publicly state the so-called compliance documents? May I ask who is challenging the legal bottom line?

Can you answer that?

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。