I 100% agree with this statement. If it had been said and promoted this way from day one, I wouldn't have said a word, and I would even have requested to participate.

I started investing in cryptocurrency projects in 2018, and now I have at least 80 or 100. Most of them started from grassroots and gradually moved toward regulations. I strongly agree that there are very few compliant projects in the cryptocurrency space, and I also strongly agree with starting first and then gradually becoming compliant.

But if you yourself are not compliant and insist on claiming to be compliant, using compliance as the main hype, then that's not grassroots; it's outright "exaggeration" (I use a less conflicting term).

From day one, the projects I've researched have never been accused outright. I've found loopholes based on the public information released by the project parties and inquired about those loopholes. If they can answer, then it's my lack of skill, and I will proactively apologize for my mistakes.

But if the project party doesn't respond or provides irrelevant answers, I can only assume that the information provided is inaccurate or untrue, and my research is based on these "not accurate and true" pieces of information.

Being able to make money is definitely a good thing; all methods to make money or make big money are written in the criminal law. One could say that criminal law is a guide to making money. If you say that my tweet caused you to miss out on trades for certain coins on some exchanges, I advise you to stop trading and study criminal law, as it's more profitable.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。