From June 8 to 9, 2026, two chains of on-chain actions that highly overlap in timing but differ in path drew ETH sentiment into the spotlight: on one side, an anonymous whale gradually deposited about $132.16 million in USDC and USDT as collateral on Aave V3, then borrowed approximately 35,001 ETH and transferred it to Binance, which was interpreted by multiple media outlets and Onchain Lens as a rare large-scale short structure betting on the decline of ETH in the secondary market. However, the whale has never publicly confirmed its true intentions, and theoretically, it cannot be ruled out that it may involve hedging or more complex structural strategies; on the other side, a newly created address, 0x708EC53182d8de6bCdFA7A9c98a6cc4dd0960074, received 25,000 ETH from Kraken around June 9, estimated at about $42.03 million at the time, which was labeled by Onchain Lens and several media as “suspected new wallet of Bitmine,” but Bitmine has not publicly confirmed the ownership of this address. The currently visible on-chain paths clearly point to two independent funding chains: the whale's path is “self-owned address → Aave V3 → Binance,” and the suspected Bitmine path is “Kraken → new address,” with no direct evidence of interaction between the two. Many see this as a contrast sample of “shorts doubling down vs. institutions taking over”; under this backdrop, the huge short position on Aave itself constitutes a significant on-chain bearish signal, but the large ETH reception into the new wallet also indicates that long and short strategies are diverging. Whether this will evolve into a unidirectional trend still relies on the subsequent on-chain behaviors of these two funding routes and more official information for validation.

$132.16 Million Placed on Aave: Whale Amplifies Short Leverage

According to Onchain Lens tracking, from June 8 to 9, an anonymous whale deposited approximately $132.16 million in USDC and USDT in batches as collateral into Aave V3 and subsequently borrowed around 35,001 ETH. Following the borrowing, this batch of ETH was immediately transferred to Binance, leading many media outlets to infer that it had been sold on-site, with the overall path showing a typical directional betting structure of “collateralized by dollar assets → borrowed ETH → sold on exchange.” Aave V3 natively supports this type of model: users deposit relatively stable value assets first and then borrow volatile assets to sell, allowing for greater short profits if the asset's price declines later, enabling them to buy back ETH at a lower price to repay.

From a risk structure perspective, this type of leveraged short position through lending protocols essentially concentrates upward price risk on the on-chain collateralized position: if the ETH price continues to rise and health factors decline, borrowers may be forced to add collateral or face liquidation, while also paying continued borrowing interest costs. Thus, this $132.16 million collateral corresponding to the borrowing of 35,000 ETH indeed constitutes a bearish exposure on-chain, but currently, we can only infer its inclination from the position structure and fund flows—it cannot equate to a public statement from the parties involved declaring “bearish on ETH.” Multiple media outlets have also pointed out that this structure could entirely serve as a hedge for off-exchange long positions, cross-market arbitrage trading, or more complex structured strategies. In the absence of any further operations or official explanations, interpreting this as a singular extreme bearish bet requires a degree of caution.

Single Large Short Position: ETH Bullish and Bearish Sentiment Tightens

Using approximately $132.16 million worth of USDC and USDT as collateral to borrow about 35,001 ETH from Aave V3 and then transferring this ETH to Binance has been directly interpreted by multiple media outlets and Onchain Lens as a large short action betting on the price decline of ETH. Research materials also clearly classify this operation, which combines collateral scale with borrowed asset volume, as a “recent rare large short,” effectively using a single address to bring ETH bearish sentiment to a high level of exposure.

However, from the perspective of pricing power, this still only represents a structural short from one address, not equivalent to “overall institutional consensus to go bearish on ETH.” The whale has not publicly articulated its strategic intentions, and multiple media have repeatedly emphasized that this position could entirely be part of a hedging segment of off-exchange long exposure or one part of a more complex multi-leg strategy. What can be confirmed is that without knowledge of the specific liquidation ranges, such a scale of collateralized borrowing when faced with dramatic fluctuations in ETH prices, whether upward or downward, will significantly amplify gains, losses, and potential liquidation pressures. Market participants instinctively view it as a possible “single leverage variable” that may magnify short-term volatility, thus further tightening expectations regarding ETH's long and short balance.

25,000 ETH Changes Hands

According to AiCoin data, around June 9, the newly created address 0x708EC53182d8de6bCdFA7A9c98a6cc4dd0960074 became active for the first time and received 25,000 ETH from Kraken, estimated at about $42.03 million at the time. The currently visible on-chain funding path is extremely clear: Kraken outflow → this new address, with no further large-scale outflow, return to the exchange, or interaction with other protocols recorded, suggesting it is more akin to a lump-sum collection of coins rather than a high-frequency operation of a hot wallet.

Onchain Lens and multiple media described this address as “suspected new wallet of Bitmine,” mainly based on its funding inflow path and address activation method, which show similarities with past wallets classified by the community as associated with Bitmine—both appearing as large ETH deposits from major exchanges into newly created addresses, followed by subsequent distributions or holdings. However, this judgment currently remains a behavioral characteristic comparison; Bitmine has not provided any public confirmation regarding the address ownership, and there is a lack of contract markings or cross-address signatures that can directly anchor identity on-chain, so all descriptions regarding ownership must be treated as “suspected.” In terms of possible institutional behaviors, this 25,000 ETH could be either a stock allocation from the exchange to institutional clients or custodials or possibly (assuming the “suspected” premise holds) used for spot provisioning for proprietary or client accounts, hedging derivative risks, or as settlement chips for over-the-counter large trades. However, with only the Kraken → new address link visible at this point and the subsequent use of that address not yet exposed, a more prudent interpretation is that this represents an institutional-level ETH settlement that highly overlaps in timing with the whale shorting on Aave, but with independent on-chain paths.

Movements on the Same Day: Short Whale Meets Suspected Mining Company

Placing the two pathways on the same timeline makes it easier to understand the origin of this discussion: according to on-chain records, between June 8 and 9, while the anonymous whale injected approximately $132.16 million USDC/USDT in batches to build collateral on Aave V3, it simultaneously borrowed a total of about 35,001 ETH and transferred these ETH to Binance around June 9; almost at the same time, the new address 0x708EC5…0074 received 25,000 ETH from Kraken, estimated at about $42.03 million, which was referred to by multiple media and Onchain Lens as a “suspected new wallet of Bitmine.” On one side is a large short position interpreted as betting on downward price action through borrowing, while on the other is a bulk collection of spot assets; this high overlap in rhythm is naturally packaged by public opinion as a typical image of “conflicting longs and shorts on the same day.”

However, from the visible path details on-chain, the two are still two independent funding trajectories: the whale's path is self-owned address → Aave V3 → Binance, while the suspected Bitmine path is Kraken → new address, with no shared intermediate addresses or direct transactions exposed in between and no evidence showing the existence of a common controlling entity. A more reasonable description is that this is a set of closely timed, seemingly opposing signals with no causal connection; it may merely be a coincidental overlap or a natural outcome of different segments of the industry chain doing their own hedging and inventory management, or it could simply represent two entirely independent institutions adjusting their ETH exposures within their respective frameworks.

Under the Pull of Long and Short Signals, What to Watch for ETH Moving Forward

From the currently visible on-chain trajectories, one end is the short structure of 35,001 ETH borrowed and transferred to Binance, collateralized with approximately $132.16 million USDC/USDT, while the other end is the “suspected new wallet of Bitmine” collecting 25,000 ETH from Kraken around June 9. The comparison of these two paths in time and direction adds a layer of speculation to ETH's short-term sentiment, but according to AiCoin data, current public information only covers the establishment and transfers of positions on June 8-9, and whether there will be any subsequent top-ups, reductions, or additional large transfers has not yet manifested on-chain. In the absence of public statements from the parties involved and without more follow-up operations, neither the whale's large short on Aave nor the suspected institutional wallet allocation can be viewed as unilateral or definitive directional guidance. The next important lines to track are: firstly, whether the whale on Aave V3 increases or decreases positions, including whether it adds or withdraws collateral assets, repays part of the borrowing, or borrows ETH again, which will directly change its risk exposure; secondly, whether the “suspected Bitmine wallet” will appear to make large transfers to staking contracts, exchanges, or other institutional addresses, to complete the motivation clues if it is for long-term holding, inventory management, or other uses; and thirdly, how media and analysts adjust interpretations as new data emerges—under the current premise of primarily viewing it as a “sample of short-term bearish sentiment heating up alongside institutional configuration differentiation,” market sentiment responses to these on-chain actions will become an important variable in determining whether the long and short forces for ETH shift anew.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。