On June 4-5, 2026, on-chain monitoring tools captured a rapidly amplified anomaly: Onchain Lens identified an address related to Multicoin Capital, 0xD4d56a30a4a745f8Ba732E8B453b7066260fBC10, transferring approximately 56.116 million ENA into custody/service addresses recognized as controlled by Galaxy Digital and BitGo, amounting to about 5.28 million dollars at that time. As a venture capital institution actively involved in the crypto field for a long time, every large position movement by Multicoin is viewed as a “signal,” especially against the backdrop of the already volatile nature of the Ethena protocol's token ENA. Many traders instinctively interpreted this fund transfer as potential selling pressure or a preparatory action for liquidity. However, as of June 5, Multicoin, Galaxy Digital, and BitGo had not publicly explained the specific use of this batch of ENA; on-chain records can only confirm that the assets have entered the custody system without revealing whether they have been sold, staked, or arranged for over-the-counter trades. It is worth noting that the roles of Galaxy and BitGo in the industry are more aligned with providing custody and related services to institutional clients rather than typical retail trading platforms. In the current regulatory environment, where jurisdictions generally require such institutions to fulfill KYC/AML obligations, this ENA transfer appears more like a test regarding asset custody pathways and compliance responsibilities. Therefore, this article will avoid speculation on short-term prices and “motivation stories,” focusing instead on the signals the custody choice itself reveals about compliance boundaries and industry rules.
56.11 Million ENA From Self-Custody to Institutional Compliance Custody
On June 4-5, 2026, on-chain records indicated that approximately 56.116 million ENA (about 5.28 million dollars) was transferred from address 0xD4d56a30a4a745f8Ba732E8B453b7066260fBC10 to custody or service addresses identified by several on-chain analysis services as controlled by Galaxy Digital and BitGo. This source address had previously been marked by Onchain Lens as related to Multicoin Capital, and combined with the significant volume transferred, it resembled a single “fund-level” migration. This sequence of actions feels more like moving positions from a fund's self-held address to a regulated institutional financial infrastructure. The research brief also mentioned that in May 2026, around 150,000 AAVE was deposited into the same institution, linking this to OTC purposes; however, this usage has not been confirmed by the parties involved. Therefore, what can be substantiated about the ENA incident remains the fact that a “large position entered the Galaxy/BitGo system.”
Unlike typical retail deposit addresses on centralized exchanges, these custody or OTC-related addresses often correspond to over-the-counter arrangements or pure custody relationships rather than direct order matching. From a compliance standpoint, this signifies that the positions are entrusted to institutions that must fulfill KYC/AML obligations for custody or circulation arrangements. Regulatory bodies in multiple jurisdictions require that custody and OTC services targeting institutional clients carry out customer identification and monitor suspicious transactions. Under such a regulatory framework, this ENA transfer from self-custody to Galaxy/BitGo makes it easier for the large holdings and any potential future trades, previously under the independent control of the fund, to be included in the existing KYC/AML monitoring. On-chain visibility only shows the “inbound” timing and quantity, while the audit and reporting systems transfer any subsequent actions regarding whether the assets were sold, staked, or otherwise arranged internally within the custody framework.
AAVE and ENA Reusing Galaxy and BitGo Channels
If we place the ENA “entry” back into the timeline, a channel that has already left traces becomes visible. The research brief quotes reports that in May 2026, Multicoin Capital deposited approximately 150,000 AAVE with Galaxy Digital and BitGo, valued at around 14.9 million dollars, which was described as being related to OTC purposes. However, there are currently no official documents from Multicoin, Galaxy, or BitGo to confirm whether those AAVE were indeed used for OTC trading. On-chain records can only validate the “custody deposit” aspect, thus “used for OTC” can be seen merely as speculative use within industry reports and not equated with established facts like the situation with ENA.
What has been repeatedly confirmed on-chain is the model itself: shortly after the AAVE deposit, Multicoin continued processing ENA positions via the Galaxy/BitGo system—on June 4-5, a similarly marked related address transferred about 56.116 million ENA (about 5.28 million dollars) into the custody/service addresses controlled by these two institutions. Compared to directly dumping a large holding into a public exchange, this reuse of the same group of custody and OTC channels resembles a fund's reliance on established pathways for compliance review, risk control, and due diligence with counterparties: once a pathway has functioned well under KYC/AML frameworks, it becomes a “standard outlet” for multiple assets. For Galaxy and BitGo, this positions them as a unified compliance hub amid multiple assets and events; for regulatory observers, it provides a clear behavioral sample to assess to what extent a venture capital fund is willing to place its positions under the constraints of the same compliance infrastructure.
Galaxy and BitGo as Regulated Exits for Venture Capital
On the other end of this “standard exit,” Galaxy Digital and BitGo have long ceased to be passive receiving addresses for singular assets; they are designed as compliance infrastructures aimed at institutional clients: custody, clearing, matching, and internal account management are packaged within the same KYC/AML and anti-terror financing control frameworks. For venture capital holding fund-level positions, whether it is the previously reported deposit of approximately 150,000 AAVE related to OTC purposes or the 56.116 million ENA transferred during June 4-5, 2026, which amounts to about 5.28 million dollars, it essentially involves placing previously exposed large holdings on-chain into a “regulatory container” that requires identity verification, source verification, and position record obligations.
From a regulatory perspective, large token holders choosing institutions like Galaxy and BitGo for custody and potential OTC channels have two direct consequences: first, it rewrites what may have been anonymous OTC sell-offs into a stepwise disposition within an account system that has undergone compliance reviews, thereby reducing the risks of information opacity and price impacts typically found in “dark market dumping;” second, it confines cross-border fund flows within intermediaries that bear compliance obligations, allowing suspicious paths to potentially be intercepted or leave tracks during KYC/AML screenings. As Multicoin’s ENA-level positions enter the Galaxy/BitGo system, and as of June 5, the outside world cannot directly glean the subsequent disposal path from on-chain data, this “visible entry, unclear exit” state is precisely what regulators prefer to see—activities are locked within an auditable, inquirable compliance framework, even if the market struggles to assess the rhythm of sell pressure in the short term.
Compliance Exit and Selling Pressure for Ethena and ENA Holders
From the perspective of the Ethena project team, the entry of approximately 56.116 million ENA into custody and service systems aimed at institutions such as Galaxy Digital and BitGo effectively brings the major holders of the token “into the spotlight”: within a compliance framework where KYC/AML obligations are clearer, the project can explain to potential regulators and trading platforms—they are not finding large chips floating in un-audited cold wallets but rather locked within regulatory infrastructure, which enhances Ethena's “compliance narrative.” However, for ENA holders, the same action is interpreted as a potential starting point for selling pressure: when held by the fund in addresses like 0xD4d5..., it was more seen as a locked position; once entering custody institutions, the market instinctively correlates this with possible future OTC block trades or transfers to trading venues. Especially against the backdrop of recent price volatility in ENA, any movement valued at approximately 5.28 million dollars will be magnified. However, as of June 5, on-chain records only confirm this ENA flow from Multicoin-related addresses to Galaxy/BitGo, with no significant further outflow observed toward public trading platforms, nor can one directly infer from on-chain records whether sales or other arrangements have been executed within custody.
For Ethena and early investors, the true game lies in how to utilize the division of labor between custody, OTC, and public markets to achieve a balance between “compliance exit” and “mitigating secondary impacts.” The research brief notes that in May 2026, Multicoin deposited about 150,000 AAVE with Galaxy and BitGo, describing its use as related to OTC purposes (yet to be verified), which provides a possible behavioral template for the market: large positions first enter regulated custody, then sequentially transfer to new institutional buyers through OTC arrangements, rather than directly dumping onto the order book. From a regulatory viewpoint, this path encapsulates fund flows within nodes that must fulfill KYC/AML obligations; from the perspective of ENA holders, this transforms the risk from “whether it will be sold” to “when and at what pace it will be sold.” In the absence of public explanations from Multicoin, Galaxy, or BitGo, and given that there are no further significant outflows observed on-chain, this ENA transfer resembles a shift from “hard-to-dispose self-managed positions” to “equipment that can be disposed of anytime within a compliance framework,” where the symbolic significance outweighs the short-term facts of selling that have already taken place.
On-Chain Transparency vs. Custody Black Box: Regulatory and Market Games Continue
From depositing approximately 150,000 AAVE reported in May to around 56.116 million ENA (about 5.28 million dollars) entering the Galaxy Digital and BitGo systems on June 4-5, 2026, Multicoin's ongoing choice of the same type of institutional channels has made the pathway of “large token migration within compliance frameworks” very typical: on the on-chain level, time, quantity, and addresses are clear-cut; how internal accounts of custody institutions match OTC or whether they are split to counterparties is entirely sealed within the “compliance black box” under KYC/AML constraints. As of June 5, 2026, publicly available information can only confirm the “deposit event” itself: Multicoin has not clarified the purpose of the ENA deposit, nor have Galaxy and BitGo disclosed any usage; there are similarly no clear indications of significant secondary transfers toward public trading platforms on-chain, leaving regulators and the market in the awkward interval of “visible migration, but the intent is opaque.” As more venture capital firms and project parties regard custody and OTC as standard practice, and as regulators in various jurisdictions push for the inclusion of custody, OTC, and fund management under a unified compliance framework, the entire lifecycle of a large token will no longer be determined by a single dimension: on-chain records provide verifiable time and scale, compliance reports determine whether it can be considered “acting legitimately,” and together they form a new window for regulatory observation, which will continue to reshape the power boundaries between project parties, institutions, and token holders.
Join our community, let's discuss and get stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
