Around June 4, 2026, the crypto world seemed to be set to slow motion: an ATM token attack occurring on BSC was flagged by monitoring agency TenArmorAlert, approximately $243,500 was stolen in the on-chain path of transaction hash 0x37b9…fd86, exposing the security issues of this public chain, which has been compromised multiple times, under the spotlight again; at the same time, the prediction market platform Polymarket was reported to be investigating its compliant competitor Kalshi internally, compiling a dossier named "copycat," implying that there are "too many coincidences" in product and rhythm similarities. These espionage-colored accusations remain unverified media claims but have already pushed a competition that originally took place within and outside regulatory frameworks into the spotlight; on a macro level, according to a single public source, the People's Bank of China chose not to initiate new reverse repurchase operations on June 4, allowing 101.3 billion yuan of 7-day reverse repos to expire naturally, achieving a net absorption of the same amount, interpreted as a more cautious liquidity management stance; nearly at the same time, David Merino, a Spanish citizen identified as the head of the FX Winning crypto Ponzi scheme, was arrested in Dubai. This case, involving over 460 million euros and affecting about 15,000 investors, has been dubbed one of the largest crypto Ponzi schemes in Spanish investigative history by local authorities. The tearing of the technical defense against on-chain attacks, the disputes between platforms about "copying" reflect the tug-of-war between commercial games and compliance boundaries, while macro absorption and multinational arrests represent an escalation in regulation and criminal accountability. This day resembles a time slice that clearly lays out the risk accumulation and order reconstruction currently experienced by the crypto world before the reader.
BSC Hit Again: ATM Tokens Stolen
On the same timeline, bad news came once again from BSC. Monitoring agency TenArmorAlert issued a warning: the ATM tokens on the BSC chain have been attacked, with approximately $243,500 worth of assets stolen. The corresponding attack transaction hash is 0x37b90a337075cd2feea93b12780abe9f953dad476e1c1418a02447aaa6dcfd86. This seemingly cold string of characters became an anchor point for this event on-chain, allowing anyone to trace the precise flow of funds on the chain, which also means that this loss is permanently written into the public ledger without the need for arbitration.
Public records show that BSC has recently been targeted multiple times, and the ATM token incident is just another footnote to the security shadows looming over this chain. For ordinary participants, the gap of over $240,000 translates into addresses being cleared within seconds, and what they can often do is just refresh the block explorer, watching that transaction marked as "successful" drift further away. The so-called DeFi autonomy and permissionless nature quickly turn into a cold reminder of "self-risk-bearing" at the moment an attack occurs: there are no customer service tickets, no freezing channels, only a confirmed, irreversible on-chain record, where the pursuit of profits and the gamble on security collide head-on, forcing every wallet holder to reassess how much they are willing to "confirm" and bear the cost of this industry.
Prediction Rift: Polymarket Questions Kalshi
While the on-chain attack had not yet dissipated, another invisible confrontation in the prediction market arena was already underway. Media outlets such as the New York Post reported that Polymarket, aimed at crypto-native users, had quietly launched an "internal investigation" into its compliant competitor Kalshi, even creating a dossier named "copycat" to systematically organize the details of Kalshi's similarities in product design, market topics, and launch rhythms with its own. A related source from Polymarket was quoted as saying that there are "too many coincidences" between the two platforms, and whether Kalshi has collected intelligence through monitoring Polymarket’s New York office remains at the level of accusations and media reports, with public information yet to provide confirmation, this can only be regarded as a claim awaiting verification.
This dispute is particularly eye-catching because both parties stand at opposite ends of the prediction market arena: Kalshi, regulated by the U.S. CFTC, strives to wrap event contracts within a compliant framework of traditional finance; Polymarket, on the other hand, grew from a crypto-native soil, closer to a user base willing to bet on the future on-chain. When "who thought of a market first" and "who is copying whose playbook" become accusations reported in the news, the contest is no longer just about traffic and transaction fees, but a more fundamental question—where should the lines of compliance, innovation boundaries, and business ethics be drawn in an industry that encourages rapid iteration and public imitation? This unsettled "copycat" controversy is thrusting this issue into the faces of all participants.
Net Absorption of 101.3 Billion: Central Bank Tightens Short-Term Faucet
On the very same day that the crypto world was caught up in a heated debate over "who is copying whom," the macro level had been quietly adjusted down a notch. On June 4, 2026, according to a single public source, the People's Bank of China chose not to conduct new reverse repo operations on that day, allowing the maturing 7-day reverse repos to naturally exit. The maturing scale on that day was 101.3 billion yuan, and due to the lack of an equal amount of renewed operations, this source calculated that the public market funds achieved a net absorption of 101.3 billion yuan. This operation is classified as routine liquidity management rather than an emergency contraction, but the figure itself is enough to depict a slightly tighter stance on marginal liquidity for the short term.
A reduction of 101.3 billion in short-term liquidity means that the buffer for interbank funding costs is thinner, making it easier for short-term rates to rise a notch. In this environment, funding that habitually relies on leverage to capture spreads tends to exhibit a somewhat more cautious risk appetite. For crypto assets, this is not directly a “bearish signal,” but it constitutes a more conservative pricing backdrop: to continue telling stories on more expensive capital, risk assets need to present more solid cash flow expectations and more compelling growth narratives, rather than solely relying on passive boosts from elevated liquidity.
Dubai Arrest of FX Winning's 460 Million Ponzi Collapse
As funding costs quietly rose within the traditional financial system, another thread in the crypto world fell into the realm of criminal accountability: according to media reports such as CriptoNoticias, David Merino, a Spanish citizen identified by Spanish authorities as the mastermind behind the FX Winning Ponzi scheme, was recently captured in Dubai. Spanish authorities described FX Winning as one of the largest crypto-related Ponzi schemes in their investigative history, with amounts involved exceeding 460 million euros and about 15,000 investors affected, primarily concentrated in Spain but extending to other regions. The arrest took place in Dubai, a hub city for cross-border asset and personnel movement, indicating that this case has long exceeded a single jurisdiction, and multinational cooperation is beginning to directly counter the fantasies of those attempting to think of themselves as outside the rules through “being overseas with money on-chain.”
Public information has yet to provide a clear timeline on when Merino will be extradited or where he will be tried, but the point of "the mastermind being arrested abroad" is enough to shift many people's risk expectations on a narrative level. Over the past few years, many crypto financing stories branded with “quantitative arbitrage,” “synthetic forex,” and “guaranteed high returns” have relied on regulatory vacuums and difficulties in cross-border enforcement to sell a sense of security; however, projects like FX Winning, categorized as Ponzi schemes, once they enter the phase of multinational capture, allow significantly less space for such narratives. For those accustomed to attracting funds with exaggerated rates of return, the notion that “as long as operated overseas and only collects crypto assets, it is safe” is becoming ineffective; for ordinary investors, this massive Ponzi collapse and the Dubai arrest serve as a clear reminder: when high return promises lack transparent asset support and verifiable cash flow sources, delayed regulation doesn’t mean it won’t come.
Security Games and Accountability: The Next Scene in the Crypto World
Bringing the timeline back to early June 2026: the ATM tokens on BSC were exploited on transaction hash 0x37b90a337075cd2feea93b12780abe9f953dad476e1c1418a02447aaa6dcfd86, with approximately $243,500 evaporating in an instant, reminding everyone that every line of code in on-chain protocols can become a risk amplifier for retail investors; under the banner of compliance, Polymarket organized a "copycat" dossier accusing Kalshi of being "too similar," while whether the other party employed commercial espionage or even monitored the New York office remains to be verified. This tug-of-war, between litigation and public relations, exposes the zero-sum games within the compliance track; according to a single source, the People's Bank of China chose to let the 101.3 billion yuan 7-day reverse repos mature on June 4, achieving an equivalent net absorption, tightening marginal liquidity on the traditional financial side, adding a layer of realistic discount to all crypto pricing models predicated on “ample funds”; almost simultaneously, David Merino, accused of orchestrating the FX Winning Ponzi scheme, was apprehended in Dubai, with numbers involving over 460 million euros and around 15,000 victims indicating that cross-border law enforcement is catching up with the narrative’s speed. When on-chain attacks, platform disputes, monetary authority operations, and cross-border captures overlap within the same time window, participants can no longer imagine themselves as "pure profit-seekers" outside the rules; the boundaries of compliance, behavioral constraints of counterparties, and criminal consequences are all entering the pricing framework. Moving forward, whether DeFi can provide verifiable security improvements in permission management and risk control architecture, how regulatory agencies will redraw the tolerance boundaries for prediction markets amidst the Polymarket and Kalshi dispute, and whether the follow-up developments of the FX Winning case in extradition and accountability can form a deterrent precedent will determine whether the next scene regarding safety, games, and accountability leads to higher cost risks, or more conscious prudence and restraint.
Join our community, let’s discuss together and become stronger!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
On-chain Twitter for AiCoin: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
