From May 31 to June 1, 2026, the Middle Eastern battlefield and negotiation table were intertwined: on one side, Washington and Tehran were repeatedly redrafting a memorandum draft concerning "extending the ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz," with the text being tossed back and forth between the two parties. Iran, through the Tasnim News Agency, indicated that it would still propose amendments, and everything remained far from settled; on the other side, Israel had launched ground military operations in Lebanon, but the scale and operational details of these actions remained a blank slate in publicly available information. Trump released an optimistic signal from the White House Situation Room, stating, "We expect to announce an agreement with Iran," and soon publicly refuted CNN's report on the "Iran Agreement," emphasizing that the agreement explicitly prohibits Iran from having nuclear weapons, attempting to regain narrative control in the public opinion space, while the ultimate stance of Iran's top leadership on the current text remains indeterminate. According to a single source, in this highly uncertain environment of "negotiations not yet solidified and fires spreading on the frontlines," U.S. stock night trading software and the cloud computing sector chose to advance: IBM rose over 11%, ARM accumulated over 220% year-to-date, ServiceNow rose over 10%, and Microsoft, Palantir, and S&P rose over 3%, as if betting on an unfinished script— the ceasefire would be extended, the Strait of Hormuz would not be closed, and geopolitical tensions would eventually be negotiated down.
The Key to the Strait of Hormuz: The Lifeline of Oil and Shadows of Inflation
For all those betting on risky assets, this round of Middle Eastern games truly represents a "life-and-death juncture," not in the social media wars of words, but in the Strait of Hormuz—a narrow passage that could be blocked by a missile—where approximately 20% of the world's oil transportation takes place. Every negotiation regarding its passage right between the U.S. and Iran effectively leverages global energy prices and inflation expectations. The draft memorandum currently on the negotiation table is seen as the key to reopening this waterway, with one of its goals being to extend the ceasefire and restore the passage rights in the Strait of Hormuz. However, how long the ceasefire can last and under what conditions the strait will open, to date, there have been no publicly available, verifiable terms.
The Iranian Tasnim News Agency has already hinted: Tehran will propose amendments to the text, and text exchanges are still ongoing, indicating that even the "draft of the draft" is far from being finalized. As of June 1, 2026, there is still no public information about any agreement being officially reached or signed, and the official stance of Iran's Supreme Leader system on the current text remains blank in publicly available information. Consequently, the future trajectory of oil prices and inflation hangs in suspension based on an unsigned document: once the ceasefire is genuinely extended and the Strait of Hormuz remains open, the market's current optimistic bets would have a fundamental premise; should the text break down on details, expectations for passage through the strait may tighten again, and current risk assets betting on successful negotiations might be forced to pay the price of repricing due to such uncertainty.
Trump's Clash with CNN: A Document Becomes a Battlefield of Public Opinion
While the text remained in the back-and-forth of lawyers and diplomatic teams, Trump had already brought this yet-to-be-disclosed "Iran Agreement" to the public scrutiny. He publicly called out CNN for "misinterpreting," claiming their reporting that the agreement did not involve "nuclear" issues was misleading to the public, while the text he was promoting "clearly stipulates that Iran must not possess nuclear weapons." This statement, "must not possess nuclear weapons," was packaged by him as a personal victory in redrawing the security red lines, both an explanation to domestic voters and an advance setting of a political narrative coordinate for the negotiation outcome—especially against the background that he had personally led the U.S. withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear Agreement (JCPOA) during his first term; this shift in attitude was seen by outsiders as a signal of returning to the nuclear diplomacy stage.
The issue is that the media and the White House hold conflicting views at this moment, while the content of the agreement itself remains opaque. According to a single source, Trump indicated to those around him in a Friday meeting at the White House Situation Room that an Iran-related agreement would be announced soon, but as of June 1, 2026, this agreement has still not been officially released to the public. The specific terms of the text are locked away in the Situation Room and at negotiation desks, and the public only sees snippets of mutual accusations and contradictory versions. This information asymmetry causes the market to sway between the expectation of an "imminent announcement" and the reality of delayed outcomes, obliging investors' risk assessment to be based on an invisible agreement and an already heated public opinion battle.
Tehran's Domestic Rumors: The President Remains in Office, Negotiation Window Not Closed
On the same night that Washington generated anticipation with "imminent announcements," Tehran chose to turn the lens inward. On May 31, officials from the Iranian presidential office publicly refuted rumors of Pezeshkian's resignation via social media, emphasizing that he will continue to fulfill his duties and "will not stop serving the Iranian people." This seemingly plain statement, in essence, sends a signal simultaneously to the counterparts at the negotiation table and the domestic audience: the president has not "stepped down," and the administrative machinery responsible for engaging with the memorandum is still in operation, and the outside world should not immediately interpret the long-delayed agreement as a loss of control over the political situation.
Almost simultaneously, the Iranian Tasnim News Agency released news indicating that Tehran would propose amendments to the memorandum text, and text exchanges are still ongoing, with the negotiations being rebranded as "technical details exchanges" rather than a political table flip. The back-and-forth over the text suggests that Iran has not closed the window; however, key variables remain intentionally left blank—there is no clear stance from the Supreme Leader on the current text reflected in existing public information. Statements like "Iran is fully prepared to accept a no-agreement outcome" lack multi-party confirmation and can only be regarded as unverified rumors. Under this structure, the president's stay and the documentation exchanges seem more like a posture to keep options open: Tehran does not want to be seen as actively passing the buck but also retains the space to turn hardline at any time; the negotiation window remains open, but no one dares to guarantee how long it will remain so.
The Fire Front Shifts North to Lebanon: The Ceasefire Calculation Could Be Blown at Any Time
While Tehran and Washington are still engaged in wordplay over extending the ceasefire and reopening the Strait of Hormuz's memorandum, the fireline to the north has already been pulled to Lebanon. Factually, Israel has launched ground military actions, though the external world cannot see their scale or specific targets. Even opaque advances are enough to tear open a new instability fissure on the map. For a ceasefire and passage agreement heavily reliant on a "regional cooling atmosphere," this means that theoretical arrangements have not yet been put into writing, already partially erased by the realities of the battlefield.
The battlefront extending from Gaza to Lebanon not only adds another war zone but also re-prices the political costs for all parties: any agreement packaged by the U.S. and Iran as "cooling tensions" now must face questions about escalating hostilities between Israel and Lebanon. Tehran's hardliners find it easier to attack compromises as "weakness," and Washington finds it hard to explain domestically why it continues to promote ceasefire documents while allies escalate offensives. In this "writing a ceasefire at the negotiation table while simultaneously escalating on the frontlines" structure, the market receives two conflicting signals: one being the hope for restoring passage through the Strait of Hormuz and the other being the risk expectations overflowing from the Middle Eastern battlefield, causing risk asset pricing to swing back and forth between these two contradicting narratives.
The Calm Surface of Tech Stocks Leading the Charge: What Signals Should Crypto Investors Watch For?
With the U.S.-Iran agreement still at the "expected to be announced" stage, and the conflict between Israel and Lebanon having already moved to ground operations, according to a single source, the first to "gesture" in the U.S. night trading was the seemingly unrelated software and cloud computing sector: IBM rose over 11%, ARM accumulated over 220% year-to-date, ServiceNow rose over 10%, and Microsoft, Palantir, and S&P rose over 3%, with funds placing a bet on the tech stocks that negotiations would ultimately prevail over war. On the surface, risk assets seem to have temporarily desensitized to the Middle Eastern situation, but this appears more like moving the risk from the present to the future—relocating it to whether the agreement actually lands, whether the ceasefire can be extended, whether the Strait of Hormuz remains open, whether the conflict between Israel and Lebanon will see a new escalation, and whether relevant sanctions expectations suddenly reverse these explicit time points. For crypto investors, who have no clear chain and price data for reference, what can be done now is not to derive any inevitable market trends from the tech stocks' rise but to keep an eye on these main lines: firstly, whether the memorandum can move from draft exchanges to formal announcements; secondly, whether the Strait of Hormuz, which carries about 20% of global oil transportation, remains open; thirdly, whether Israel's actions in Lebanon will continue to escalate, raising regional risk premiums; and fourthly, whether there will be directional easing or tightening in the sanctions expectations surrounding Iran, as only substantial changes in these variables can truly reshape the market's risk boundaries regarding the bet on "negotiations over war."
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
