CoinW Research Institute
Recently, the cryptocurrency derivatives market is about to welcome an event of structural significance. The cryptocurrency futures and options under CME Group will enter a 24-hour, 7-day-per-week continuous trading mode starting from May 29. This means that one of the largest and most strictly regulated derivatives exchanges in the traditional financial system will be basically aligned with the crypto-native market in terms of trading hours.
In the past, the understanding of CME within the crypto market was generally focused on two levels. First, its Bitcoin futures contracts have long been regarded as the most recognized compliant channel for institutional funds entering the crypto market; second, it closed for the weekend, creating a special price gap known as “CME Gap.” However, starting from May 29, both of these aspects may be rewritten. At the same time, CME is not the only institution adjusting towards this all-weather direction. Over the past twelve months, institutions like Cboe (one of the world's largest options exchanges), NYSE Arca, Nasdaq, Robinhood, and Coinbase International have all been pushing their all-weather routes along different product forms, asset ranges, and client bases, forming a broader market structural competition.
In the following text, CoinW Research Institute will use the details of CME's soon-to-launch products as a starting point, connecting the differentiated routes of major North American exchanges and compliance agencies in all-weather trading, as well as the changes in the CFTC’s (U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission) attitude towards perpetual contracts over the past six months, to analyze the true impact of this event on the structure of the crypto derivatives market, and further discuss how the relative advantages held by on-chain perpetual leaders are being re-priced across various dimensions in this industry-wide competition.
1. CME All-Weather Trading Product Details
Schedule and Maintenance Windows
According to official news from CME Group, CME's cryptocurrency futures and options will enter continuous trading mode starting at 4:02 PM US Central Time on May 29, 2026. The maintenance window has been compressed to a very limited range, with just 2 minutes from 4:00 PM to 4:02 PM on weekdays and 2 hours from 2:00 AM to 4:00 AM on Saturdays. In other words, nearly 166 hours of continuous trading are available each week, with only a little over 10 minutes requiring interruption. From a trading time perspective, CME is now basically aligned with crypto-native markets like Hyperliquid.
It should be noted that while CME's trading hours have been synchronized, settlement has not yet been aligned. All trades completed from Friday evening to Sunday evening will be recorded by CME as the next business day, and corresponding clearing, fund settlements, and regulatory reports will still be completed uniformly on Monday. This means that CME's matching system will remain continuously online, but the fund transfers of the underlying banking system will still be confined to working hours.
Asset Coverage and Existing Scale
This upcoming all-weather trading will almost cover all the cryptocurrency futures and options products currently listed by CME, including BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, LINK, XLM, DOT, AVAX, and SUI, totaling 10 standard contracts. Looking at the asset list, it nearly covers all mainstream currencies that have either received U.S. spot ETF approval or are at the final stages of ETF approval.
In terms of scale, CME’s cryptocurrency derivatives business has already gained significant volume. According to official data from CME, the nominal transaction volume for its cryptocurrency futures and options is approximately $3 trillion in 2025, with daily transactions of about 407,200 contracts in 2026 up to February, an increase of approximately 46% year-on-year, and an average daily open interest of about 335,400 contracts, an increase of about 7% year-on-year.
2. Looks Like Perpetual, Actually Still Expiring Contracts
CME All-Weather Trading Product Form
All the cryptocurrency contracts launched by CME this time still belong to the traditional futures category, meaning they still have a fixed expiration date. Each contract has a designated settlement date, expiring monthly or quarterly, and will be settled in cash based on CME’s reference price or similar benchmark price upon expiration. This means that regardless of how bullish traders are about the future, they cannot hold the same contract long-term and must continuously roll over their positions from near-month to far-month, with each roll-over incurring additional spreads and costs.
In contrast, perpetual contracts on platforms like Hyperliquid avoid this "expiration friction." They automatically align the contract prices with spot prices using a funding rate mechanism every few hours, where both longs and shorts pay fees to each other proportionally. For traders, this provides an experience similar to leveraged and two-way spot trading. CME's upgrade does not replicate this mechanism; what they have done is extend the trading hours of traditional futures to align with crypto-native markets, but the product's genetic structure still belongs to traditional futures.
Why CME Doesn’t Directly Go for Perpetual
It is worth discussing that CME’s decision not to directly offer perpetual contracts is not due to product willingness or technical capacity limitations, but is directly constrained by U.S. law. The U.S. Commodity Exchange Act defines futures contracts as needing to have the condition of "future delivery," meaning they must have a clear expiration date and delivery arrangement. Perpetual contracts do not have an expiration date and lack true delivery actions, making it difficult to classify them as compliant futures products under the current legal framework.
This stance was expressed quite directly by CME itself. Terry Duffy, Chairman and CEO of CME Group, clearly stated in the first-quarter earnings call of 2026 that perpetual contracts are still considered illegal under the current U.S. legal framework, and he believes that such contracts are fundamentally designed for speculators and do not align with the legislative intent of the Commodity Exchange Act.
This means that for on-chain perpetual platforms like Hyperliquid, CME has addressed the "trading time" aspect, while the "contract structure" aspect remains untouched for now. The "no expiration and funding rate" mechanism provided by on-chain perpetual contracts is still outside the U.S. compliance list. How long this gap can sustain will depend on the next actions taken by U.S. regulators.
3. This All-Weather Trading Competition is Not Just About CME
When we observe the products that CME is about to launch within the entire North American exchange system, we find that it is not an isolated event. Over the past twelve months, institutions such as Cboe, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq, Robinhood, and Coinbase International have all been advancing their all-weather routes through different product forms, asset ranges, and client bases. When comparing these paths, the true position of CME's product launch on May 29 is the latest nodal point in this industry-wide competition, rather than an endpoint.
Cboe is Following a Path Closer to Continuous Futures
The Cboe Futures Exchange officially launched Bitcoin Continuous Futures (PBT) and Ether Continuous Futures (PET) on December 15, 2025. These two contracts have an expiration date set 10 years in the future and maintain a cash adjustment mechanism that anchors the contract prices to spot prices, effectively avoiding the need for traders to frequently roll over contracts. Its trading hours are from 6 PM ET on Sunday to 5 PM ET on Friday in a 23×5 mode. This means Cboe is advancing further in product form than CME, moving to "continuous futures that look like perpetual," and it is unified clearing by Cboe Clear U.S., which allows for cross-margining with existing Bitcoin futures (FBT) and Ether futures (FET). However, its asset range only covers BTC and ETH, without extending to other currencies like SOL and XRP.
By observing CME and Cboe side by side, one can see two routes going in the same direction but at different paces. CME adheres to compliance boundaries, retaining the basic structure of expiring contracts while concentrating changes on the trading time dimension; Cboe, on the other hand, is approaching perpetual mechanisms within the maximum limits allowed by compliance, simulating a perpetual experience with a longer expiration date and daily funding adjustments. One chooses a "steady product with a long time," while the other chooses "a stable time with a product close to perpetual," with the two paths quickly pushing "compliant crypto derivatives" toward the experience of on-chain perpetual contracts.
NYSE Arca and Nasdaq Bring All-Weather Trading to the Stock Market
Simultaneously advancing with CME and Cboe are two leading stock exchanges in the U.S. extending trading hours. NYSE Arca obtained accelerated approval from the SEC in February 2025 to extend weekday trading hours to nearly 22 hours, with plans to officially launch on December 6, 2026, covering all stocks, ETFs, and closed-end funds listed in the U.S. Nasdaq submitted an application to the SEC in December 2025, planning to extend trading hours to 23 hours each weekday, with expected implementation in the second half of 2026. Both expansions rely on the DTCC clearing system upgrades and the synchronization of market data SIP during extended hours.
While the all-weather extension of the stock market does not directly compete with crypto futures, it signifies that the traditional financial system is systematically abandoning the "workday and working hours" trading rhythm that has persisted for over a century. As the trading windows for stocks, ETFs, and crypto assets converge closer to a 7×24 availability, the "time gaps" required for institutional fund scheduling, hedging portfolio management, and cross-asset arbitrage will be further eliminated, providing CME and Cboe’s crypto businesses with a more coherent upstream ecosystem.
Robinhood and Coinbase International Represent Retail and Offshore Ends
On the retail front, Robinhood opened 24-hour stock trading to U.S. retail users starting in 2024, with a time window from Sunday evening at 8 PM to Friday evening at 8 PM, having accumulated more than $10 billion in transactions by early 2025, with off-hours trading days once accounting for nearly 25% of total trading volume. Its underlying path involves matching orders through Alternative Trading Systems (ATS), rather than directly connecting to the exchange’s main board. Robinhood has completed "near-all-weather" access ahead of time through a retail routing approach; however, liquidity during off-hours remains relatively fragmented.
Coinbase International represents the other end. On March 20, 2026, it launched perpetual contracts covering stocks like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, NVIDIA, Meta, Tesla, as well as SPY and QQQ, with a maximum leverage of 10 times for individual stocks and 20 times for ETFs, using USDC as the unified settlement asset and adopting continuous trading 24/7; on May 6, 2026, it again launched GOLD-PERP and SILVER-PERP precious metal perpetual contracts on the same platform. Essentially, these two sets of products represent crypto-native exchanges exporting the "perpetual contracts" product form to non-crypto assets, available only to non-U.S. users.
The Real Divergences Behind the Five Routes
Observing the all-weather paths of CME, Cboe, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq, Robinhood, and Coinbase International side by side reveals that they are seemingly moving in the same direction, but are actually diverging along four dimensions.
The first is product form: CME adheres to expiring contracts, Cboe moves towards a perpetual-style continuous futures, Coinbase International directly adopts closely resembling perpetual contracts, while NYSE and Nasdaq do not involve derivatives.
The second is the time window: from CME and Coinbase’s 24/7, to Cboe's 23×5, then to NYSE and Nasdaq’s 22 to 23 hours, with Robinhood at 24/5, covering density decreasing.
The third is the asset range: CME and Cboe cover crypto, NYSE and Nasdaq cover stocks, and Coinbase International attempts to integrate stocks, commodities, and crypto assets into the perpetual framework simultaneously.
The fourth is the client base and regulatory framework: CME, Cboe, NYSE, and Nasdaq are U.S. compliant institutions serving regulated clients, Robinhood caters to U.S. retail, while Coinbase International is available only to non-U.S. users.
It is clear that the all-weather products launched by CME on May 29 are not some kind of "exclusive revolution," but rather the latest position under the route of "U.S. compliance, crypto futures, and expiring contracts" in this industry-wide competition. Each route is seeking its optimal solution within its own compliance boundaries and client structure, and what truly determines the next phase of market structure is not what product any one player has launched on a specific day, but how these five routes' diverging and complementary aspects in product form, asset range, and client base ultimately converge into a multi-layered parallel global derivatives market structure.
4. The Era of CME Gap is Coming to an End
Beyond the route comparisons, another more tangible impact of the product launch on May 29 concerns the familiar CME Gap. This is the first concrete change the market can feel after the launch, and it is also the place where many quantitative strategies and technical analysis models will need to recalibrate.
What is CME Gap
The formation mechanism of CME Gap is very direct. Before May 29, CME's trading hours were Monday to Friday during working hours, and after the close on Friday afternoon, the matching system would not match again until reopening on Sunday evening, with approximately 48 hours of closure in between. In contrast, the crypto spot market operates continuously 7×24, so if significant volatility occurs during these 48 hours, the price at CME futures' Sunday open will create an untraded blank area between it and the Friday closing price, which appears as a gap on the candlestick chart.
Statistics from several third-party studies have shown that since 2018, about 77% of CME Gaps eventually get filled, meaning the price returns to that blank range after the gap forms at some point during the subsequent time. This rule has made "weekend gaps, Monday fills" one of the most well-known technical signals and has spawned a series of quantitative models and basis strategies built around CME Gap.
Three Types of Strategies May Be Rewritten
It is important to note that after May 29, due to CME entering the all-weather trading mode, the traditional CME Gap will structurally disappear, as the premise of "closing for 48 hours" will no longer exist, and gaps cannot form. This change may prompt at least three types of strategies to be rewritten simultaneously.
The first type is trend arbitrage strategies represented by "weekend gaps, Monday fills". These strategies previously relied on the price gaps formed during CME's closure, but once CME can trade continuously, the gaps themselves will no longer appear, making the statistical premise of related strategies invalid.
The second type involves the assumptions of funding costs in basis arbitrage strategies. Here, "basis" refers to the difference between CME futures prices and spot prices. Professional basis arbitrageurs had to factor in the "risk of holding CME shorts over the weekend without being able to hedge" into their funding costs, but after this friction decreases, it means that the arbitrage space between CME and spot prices will be overall compressed.
The third type is certain high-frequency and quantitative models' pricing on weekend volatility. In the past, due to institutions being unable to hedge risks through CME over the weekend, the weekend volatility in crypto-native exchanges was usually higher than on weekdays. With the launch of all-weather trading, the demand for institutional hedging will more smoothly distribute over weekends, possibly leading to a decline in the volatility premium for mainstream assets on weekends.
5. CFTC is the True Gatekeeper in this Long Race
The end of the CME Gap era reflects only a visible change at the product experience level. If we extend the observation period to six months to a year, the variables that truly determine the long-term structure of the crypto derivatives market are not within CME itself, nor just the exchanges like Cboe or NYSE that have already taken action, but rather the CFTC's final attitude towards the compliance of genuine perpetual contracts in the U.S. The aforementioned five all-weather routes remain at the "farthest allowable position under current law," and whether the legitimate channel for true perpetual contracts can be opened next will determine the ceiling of the entire competition.
CFTC's Attitude Towards Perpetual Contracts is Easing
Perpetual contracts have long existed in a gray area in the U.S. market, neither explicitly allowed nor completely banned. However, starting in the second half of 2025, the CFTC's attitude has shown significant loosening. Coinbase submitted two perpetual-style futures contracts through a self-certification channel in June 2025, and the CFTC did not raise objections within the statutory period; these contracts became officially tradable in the U.S. starting July 21, 2025. The contracts allow a maximum leverage of 10 times, have an expiration date set five years in the future, and permit automatic rolling, essentially representing a "near-perpetual but still with an expiration date" compromise product.
In March 2026, CFTC Chairman Michael Selig publicly stated that the CFTC would soon eliminate compliance barriers for genuine perpetual contracts within the U.S. Coupled with CME and ICE's joint letter to the CFTC regarding Hyperliquid in May, the regulatory body seems to be advancing two things simultaneously: one hand is opening perpetual contracts for players within the compliance channel, while the other is imposing clearer regulatory pressure on players outside the compliance channel. These actions collectively point in one direction: the U.S. is attempting to re-absorb a portion of the derivatives trading originally occurring offshore and on-chain back into the domestic compliance system.
Advance Layout by Coinbase and Kraken
On the industrial level, major U.S. compliance institutions are also accelerating their layouts concurrently. As mentioned earlier, Coinbase International has expanded the application range of perpetual contracts to stocks and precious metals, reserving a foundation for future products. Kraken's parent company, Payward, completed the acquisition of Bitnomial on May 1, 2026, for a transaction price of up to approximately $550 million. Bitnomial is the first company in the U.S. to fully obtain a CFTC derivatives brand license, and its product portfolio includes compliant perpetual operations, meaning Kraken now possesses the qualification to operate perpetual contracts directly within the U.S. compliance channel.
Therefore, the products launched on May 29 are more like the first step in the changes to market structure, rather than an endpoint. CME first fills in the time dimension, Cboe has advanced the product form towards perpetual style, and the CFTC may subsequently determine the product boundaries for true perpetual contracts, while compliant exchanges await the window for large-scale launch of true perpetual contracts. What on-chain perpetual platforms genuinely need to face is not the product launch of a certain exchange on a specific day, but rather the fact that the compliant market is systematically completing the functions originally monopolized by on-chain platforms along multiple paths.
6. Three Changes Worth Noting in the Next Phase of Crypto Derivatives
After the launch of CME's all-weather trading, the crypto derivatives market will not instantaneously complete its reconstruction, but the logic of competition has already begun to change. Based on the aforementioned comparison of five routes in this report and the changing attitude of the CFTC, the following three changes may emerge in the future.
First, price discovery of mainstream assets will further concentrate in regulated venues.
In the past, the price discovery of crypto assets mainly occurred in centralized exchanges like Binance and Coinbase, as well as on-chain perpetual platforms. While CME is an important channel for institutions, its weekend closure means it has been absent for certain periods of price formation. With the launch of all-weather trading, CME will be able to provide continuous online compliant pricing for mainstream coins along with Cboe's continuous futures and Coinbase's perpetual-style contracts. For average investors, this means future price fluctuations of assets like BTC and ETH may become increasingly influenced by institutional positions, CME and Cboe's open interest, options volatility, and basis changes, rather than merely by on-chain leverage and exchange funding rates.
Second, the focus of competition will shift from trading experience to clearing efficiency and collateral efficiency.
In the past, crypto derivatives platforms competed more on matching speed, transaction fees, leverage multiples, asset counts, and user experience. However, as CME pushes for all-weather trading, institutions like Google Cloud explore asset tokenization, the CFTC advances pilot projects for tokenized collateral, and Coinbase International uses USDC as a unified settlement asset, competition is beginning to shift toward more fundamental funding efficiency. Who can allow institutions to replenish margin, allocate collateral, and complete settlement faster in extreme market conditions is more likely to become the default trading method for large funds. The next stage of competition is not just "who can trade," but "who can make trading more secure and efficient."
Third, on-chain perpetual platforms will shift from competing over mainstream assets to competing over non-standard assets.
The positioning of CME and Cboe in mainstream assets like BTC and ETH will compress the relative advantages that on-chain perpetual platforms previously gained through all-weather trading. However, on-chain platforms still have parts that are hard to replace in the short term due to compliant channels, including permissionless access, rapid listing of long-tail assets, open market creation, and non-standardized risk expressions like Pre-IPO, prediction markets, and on-chain native assets. In the future, on-chain perpetual platforms may not primarily rely on "easier trading of mainstream coins" to build their moat, but rather more on "assets that compliant channels cannot reach or are very slow to access" to maintain differentiation.
This also indicates that the relationship between on-chain perpetual platforms and compliant exchanges like CME and Cboe may not necessarily form a zero-sum relationship; it is more likely that asset stratification will occur. Mainstream assets like BTC and ETH will increasingly settle into compliant channels like CME, Cboe, and Coinbase; while long-tail assets, Pre-IPO, event contracts, and on-chain native assets will continue to be experimented with on open platforms like Hyperliquid. This stratification is both a result of market efficiency and a result of parallel implementation of two orders: compliance and permissionless.
7. Conclusion
The launch of CME's all-weather products signifies that, looking at a longer time frame, the real meaning lies not in the extension of trading hours itself, but in its formal acceptance of crypto assets as a long-term asset category within the traditional financial system at the institutional level. Prior to this, crypto derivatives were often marginalized within the mainstream financial system as alternative assets, with institutions holding reservations regarding their risk exposure, clearing pathways, and compliance boundaries. When CME is willing to reshape its core derivatives business in accordance with the time rhythms of the crypto market, and institutions like Cboe, NYSE, Nasdaq, Coinbase, and Robinhood are simultaneously pushing similar actions within their respective lanes, this reservation has fundamentally been alleviated at the institutional level. This aspect is more decisive than the mere alignment of trading hours.
Under this premise, the relationship between crypto-native trading venues and traditional financial institutions will no longer revolve around "who replaces whom," but rather focus on "what each segment will handle." Mainstream currencies like BTC and ETH, which attract the most institutional funds, will gradually settle into compliant channels such as CME, Cboe, and Coinbase; while assets like crude oil, Pre-IPO, long-tail tokens, and event contracts will continue to rely on on-chain platforms like Hyperliquid. The future role positioning of on-chain perpetual leaders may shift from being a bearer of the crypto-native mainstream market to becoming an infrastructure provider for long-tail assets and permissionless demand.
However, this migration itself not only implies new opportunities but also new risks. As institutional funds continuously settle into mainstream coins through compliant channels, on-chain perpetual leaders are forced to tilt towards long-tail assets, meaning their single-platform risk structure will increasingly rely on a few high-volatility, low-liquidity products. This combination may present an extremely elastic revenue curve in a bull market, but in extreme market conditions, it could also amplify liquidity risk, clearing risk, and reputational risk simultaneously. In the future, on-chain perpetual leaders will face not only product-level competition from CME, Cboe, and Coinbase but also internal pressures arising from changes in their asset composition, which should not be overlooked when assessing their long-term trajectory.
If the observation period is further extended, the real core proposition in the future crypto derivatives market is not whether CME can introduce genuine perpetual contracts, but whether a credible standardized bridge can be established between the compliance system and the permissionless system concerning collateral, margin, and clearing. The current five all-weather routes are each diverging in product form, asset range, and client base, and whether they can ultimately be interconnected by a common clearing bridge will determine whether the future crypto derivatives market is further integrated or further fragmented. The launch of CME's all-weather products is merely the starting point of this process; the ability to build this bridge and who will lead it will determine the true nature of the market structure in the next phase.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
