This matter is somewhat mixed with love and hate.

It's like DeFi being hacked; on one hand, you want decentralization to avoid KYC and AML, but on the other hand, if a hack occurs, you wish for a centralized organization to help handle it, which is also a kind of impossible triangle.

But I still believe that USDC will be used by many people and many institutions, after all, the closest stablecoin to being fully compliant in the US is USDC. For most average investors, the ability to redeem USDC at a 1:1 ratio is the most important, especially since USDC can be directly used as USD on Coinbase.

This is something that other stablecoins do not have, and in order to achieve this level, compliance is also necessary. However, compliance brings about a double-edged sword; if you want to enjoy 1:1 unpegged stability, you must accept centralized regulation.

There is no right or wrong in this matter itself. For the project party, try to ensure that the source of funds is clean, and if real problems arise, go solve them. I remember there was a project, GAIB, which suddenly had a sum of money frozen by Circle right before its TGE, and in the end, after an explanation, they were removed from the blacklist in less than 48 hours.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。