After listening to what Teacher Michael said, I felt quite touched. Recently, many friends have chatted with me about ethereum:native related matters, maybe it's because people tend to group with similar interests, as many around me still hold a large amount of ETH.

From my personal perspective, firstly, I am still dollar-cost averaging into ETH and have no plans to cancel that. My attitude towards ETH is very simple; on one hand, it is the cryptocurrency at the forefront of compliance.

Although there are already more than a dozen tokens that have passed the spot ETF in the US, only two, one being bitcoin:native and the other being ethereum:native, have significant trading volume, especially with institutional participation at the level of BlackRock.

When I allocate funds, I have one viewpoint: whether I am right or not is not important; what matters is that I believe BlackRock is right. The conclusion it provides me is also this. So far, in the field of cryptocurrency, the largest capital flow is from BlackRock investors.

Apart from the endorsement of the brand, it has been a long time since people have engaged in discussions about the technology field. I have witnessed too many public chains claiming to be Ethereum killers, with various superior performances and lower gas fees. However, as of today, ETH is still the most complete Turing-complete public chain with the highest degree of decentralization and the strongest consensus and development.

On the contrary, I think the biggest issue with ETH is the Ethereum Foundation. The biggest gap between Vitalik and Satoshi Nakamoto is that he has not let go. The day there is no Ethereum Foundation might be the day when ETH will develop better.

Of course, in terms of price, it has indeed cooled down, but I still believe that when liquidity recovers, ETH will not perform too poorly.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。