On May 18, 2026, the shadow of accelerating inflation pressed down on global markets, and investors voted with their feet: selling bonds, pushing up the risk-free rate anchor. The yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds surged to 5.16%, reaching a new high since October 2023, while the 10-year stood at about 4.63% and the 2-year hovered around 4.10%. The entire dollar yield curve was shifted upward as oil prices continued to rise against the backdrop of tensions related to Iran and U.S. President Trump exerting pressure on Iran. Inflation, energy, and geopolitics combined to form a new macro narrative. On the other end of this curve, Ed Yardeni, President of Yardeni Research, publicly urged the Federal Reserve to abandon its "overly accommodative" stance as soon as possible, at least to retract its dovish inclination in the June meeting, to prevent the bond market from pushing long-term rates to uncontrolled heights; meanwhile, across the ocean, Daiwa Securities interpreted Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's preference — to combat rising prices with fiscal expansion rather than aggressive interest rate hikes. The Japanese yield curve steepened, and the yen continued to be under pressure, marking a rare and strong divergence in monetary policy direction between the U.S. and Japan: on one side, the Federal Reserve was forced to tighten amid high inflation and high yields, while on the other, Tokyo pressed the interest rate button and tolerated a weaker currency. In such an interest rate and exchange rate landscape, global capital not only had to reallocate between the "high-yield dollar assets vs. low-yield yen financing" spread but was also forced to reassess cryptocurrency assets, including BTC and ETH: as risk-free rates rise, spread trades restart, and monetary policy divergence widens, the question of where on-chain risk appetite and cross-border capital flows will tilt becomes the most pressing question after this round of bond market turmoil.

5% U.S. Bonds Return: Risk-Free Rates Rise

When the yield on 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds was pushed up to 5.16% in the sell-off, marking a high since October 2023, while the 10-year stayed around 4.63% and the 2-year hovered above 4.10%, the market was facing not just a "technical imbalance" at one end of the term, but the reality of the entire risk-free rate curve being lifted. The combination of these figures means that from the short end to the long end, the time value priced in dollars has become significantly more expensive, and the "discount benchmark" relied upon for global asset pricing has been passively shifted upward. This wave of increases is driven by concerns over reignited inflation, rising oil prices amid tensions in Iran and U.S. pressure on Iran, and the resultant "high inflation + high rates" new narrative rather than a normalization of rates amid a mild recovery.

At these yield levels, the bond market began to guide central banks in the opposite direction: Ed Yardeni publicly warned that the Federal Reserve risks losing control of interest rates if it does not quickly abandon its dovish stance in the June meeting. In other words, the long-term U.S. Treasury yields above 5% have already preemptively pulled the policy stance back from "prepared to ease" to "longer and higher" at the market level, forcing the Federal Reserve to either conform to bond market pricing and consolidate a high-rate tone or bear the cost of betting against the market. For all risk assets, this means two layers of compression happening simultaneously: on one hand, higher risk-free rates directly increase the discount rate, compressing the feasible valuations of equities, credit, and various high-growth assets within traditional valuation frameworks; on the other, high-yield U.S. Treasury bonds themselves are reclaiming the narrative of being "safe and rewarding," raising the extra risk premiums that investors require to hold high-volatility assets like BTC and ETH. When the risk-free rate anchor is pushed up, the implied discount rates of cryptocurrency assets are also passively uplifted, and the true destructive force of this round of bond market adjustments is just beginning to manifest in on-chain pricing.

Inflation Hedge and High Rates Press Cryptocurrency Valuations

As inflation and oil prices start to rise again, the narrative of "BTC as digital gold" often resurfaces: since fiat purchasing power is being eroded, holding a scarce asset seems safer. However, this time, the backdrop of the story includes the 10-year yield at about 4.63% and the 2-year yield at about 4.10%, with the 30-year briefly hitting 5.16%. At this risk-free rate level, so-called "hedging against inflation" first needs to answer a harsher question: why not first take that 4%-5% dollar interest? In traditional pricing, high-risk-free rates suppress the valuations of duration-sensitive assets like gold and growth stocks, and putting highly volatile, long-duration assets like BTC and ETH into the same basket means they have to promise higher potential returns to persuade capital to shift from interest-bearing dollar assets. The flow of funds from zero-yield or low-yield assets to high-yield dollar assets is the conventional path of cross-market allocation in a high-rate environment, and now this path is colliding head-on with the "digital gold" inflation narrative.

This squeeze is more intuitively reflected at the derivatives level. When the risk-free rate priced in dollars is lifted across the board, the "cost of capital" for crypto futures and perpetual contracts is passively adjusted upward: going long on BTC and ETH with leverage is no longer just the risk of price volatility but also must hedge against the higher dollar interest behind it. The positive premiums are compressed, and the spot-futures price gap can no longer easily cover the cost of capital; traditional strategies of buying spot and selling futures for hedging and arbitrage have become less appealing, resulting in a natural contraction in on-chain and over-the-counter leveraged positions while speculators on the long side are forced to lower their tolerance. When the risk-free rate provides a simple, clear, and interest-bearing safe haven, the crypto market must either reshape valuations with steeper risk premiums or accept a new balance with a lower leverage ratio and more restrained risk appetite.

Japan Presses the Interest Rate Button: Yen Carry Trades Raise Leverage

While the discussions in Washington grapple with high inflation and long-end yields around 5%, Daiwa Securities offers a different label for Tokyo: Prime Minister Fumio Kishida is more willing to counter price pressures with fiscal expansion while remaining restrained on monetary policy tightening. The direct result of this orientation is that the Japanese yield curve has steepened during the adjustment in the global bond market, and the yen has come under pressure, resulting in a policy divergence between Japan and the U.S. — while facing inflation and high yield pressures, Japan has chosen to lag in terms of interest rates.

For global funds, this divergence is not an abstract academic issue but a very concrete trading chain: the higher risk-free rates in the U.S. provide a high-yield safe haven; Japanese rates remain low and the currency weak, providing financing for carry trades of "borrowing yen to buy high-yield assets." Historically, low-rate currencies have often been used to leverage across assets, and the yen has long been this cog; now this logic extends to the crypto market: some institutions finance with yen to allocate to dollar-denominated assets and BTC, ETH positions, viewing on-chain perpetual contracts and options as a second layer of leverage to amplify returns. But this also means that once inflation pressures ultimately force Japanese policymakers to shift from "fiscal priority" to a more stringent monetary tightening, the yen carry trade chain could suddenly reverse, forcing across-market leveraged positions to deleverage, and high beta assets like BTC and ETH will face additional liquidation pressures from the "yen side."

Oil Prices and Iran's Frontline, Miner's Costs and Inflation Expectations

Apart from the yen carry trade chain, the current global bond sell-off has another more primal driving force: energy and geopolitics. Concerns about inflation, rising oil prices, and tensions related to Iran are widely regarded as significant catalysts for this round of selling, and according to a single source, U.S. President Trump has pressured Iran to reach an agreement, with the market interpreting this as an escalation of the game, further raising oil price expectations. For bond traders, this is no longer seen as a "one-time oil price shock," but as internalized into a higher, stickier inflation path — once the energy chain is involved in geopolitical confrontation, the risk of "secondary transmission" regarding wages and service prices is written into models, and long-end yields naturally have to pay a higher inflation premium for this long-term uncertainty.

This chain of repricing oil prices and inflation expectations will directly penetrate the supply side of the Bitcoin network. Energy costs account for a significant weight in the total costs of BTC mining, and there is a certain correlation between oil prices and electricity prices. As the market begins to trade the scenario of "rising oil price central and more stubborn inflation," miners face a trend upwards in electricity prices and higher marginal costs per kilowatt hour: the breakeven points for high-energy, low-efficiency mining rigs are pushed higher, the pace of hash power expansion is forced to slow down, and some small and medium miners can only increase their BTC selling ratios to hedge against cash flow pressures. On-chain, this means increasing potential marginal selling pressure from miners, while from the asset narrative perspective, amid rising geopolitical tensions and inflation expectations, traditional funds tend to increase their weights in hard assets like gold and commodities, assessing cryptocurrency assets within this framework as well, treating BTC's correlation with commodities and energy sectors as a re-tradable theme, with the key being whether the market ultimately views BTC as a "high beta hard asset hedge" or as a "high duration technology risk asset."

BTC and U.S. Bonds Compete for Attention: Capital Positioning On-Chain

As the 30-year U.S. Treasury yield was re-anchored at 5.16% and Yardeni publicly urged the Federal Reserve to remove its "accommodative stance" in June, the first reaction from global capital was to calculate: whether to lock in a string of certain dollar interest rates to combat inflation and geopolitical risks or to take on a string of highly volatile on-chain assets. The rise in risk-free rates effectively raises the "valuation denominator" for BTC and ETH — either future appreciation expectations need to increase significantly, or current pricing must be adjusted downwards, and a balance must be re-arranged between the two. In this environment, U.S. bonds and high-yield dollar deposits naturally create a "suction effect" on cryptocurrencies, compressing the market's willingness to pay premiums for narratives, technology, and future growth. On-chain, there is a preference for shorter-duration, lower-volatility "dollar-type assets for profit-taking," rather than unlimited leverage chasing mainstream high beta coins. Meanwhile, on the Japanese side, this path as portrayed by Daiwa Securities is being pursued: prioritizing fiscal expansion, maintaining a restrained attitude towards interest rate hikes, resulting in a steepening yield curve and pressure on the yen; Asian capital, situated in the "weak local currency + external high rates" squeeze, begins to view BTC and ETH as hedging and leveraging tools on par with dollar-denominated assets — capable of stepping out of their local balance sheets during depreciation, while also allowing for dynamic switching between dollar rates and crypto volatility through 24-hour cross-border flow. In trading terms, the real focus is no longer on "bullish or bearish" but rather: after the divergence in U.S. and Japanese policies and the repricing of the U.S. Treasury yield curve, whether BTC/ETH still provides sufficient risk premium relative to U.S. bonds and cash rates, and whether the on-chain positioning structure of "dollar-type assets vs. crypto spot" will oscillate with every slight adjustment in interest rate expectations, ultimately pushing the crypto market to prove its capital use value with a more stringent return-to-volatility ratio.

Join our community, let's discuss, and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。