In the previous article, we discussed the controversy surrounding ETH $ASTEROID and SOL/BAGS $ASTEROID from a certain perspective:

This is not just a simple community infighting, but a competition between two assets vying for the main representation of the same world-class emotional narrative.

Today, let’s continue to talk about a more fundamental issue:

**The market cap ceiling of a meme is ultimately determined by liquidity.**

Many people understand memes, and their first reaction is narrative.

Is the story good enough?

Is the emotion strong enough?

Is there a KOL involved?

Which one is more orthodox?

Which one has a moral advantage?

Which one can better represent this meme?

These are certainly important.

But if you only look at these, it’s easy to overlook the most core aspect of a meme:

**How high a meme can rise depends not only on how many people believe in it but also on how much liquidity is willing to enter it.**

Narrative determines attention.

Liquidity determines market cap ceiling.

No narrative means no one is watching.

No liquidity means that even if many people are watching, it still cannot turn into a large market cap.

So, a truly significant meme must achieve two things at the same time:

First, attract attention.

Second, accommodate liquidity.

Narrative resolves the question of “why buy.”

Liquidity resolves the questions of “can I buy, dare I buy, and can I exit after buying.”

This is the aspect that many people easily overlook when looking at memes.

A meme can have a great story, be very touching, and be highly shareable, but if the pool isn’t deep enough, the transactions aren’t large enough, the number of holders isn’t sufficient, and the exit channels aren’t smooth, its market cap ceiling will be locked.

Because truly large funds do not solely consider buying.

They care more about:

Once I get in, who’s going to take me out?

Can I increase my position?

Will increasing my position push the price too high?

When I sell, will I directly crash the market?

Is there enough external liquidity in this market to absorb it?

So, the essence of a meme is not just a simple emotional game.

It is:

**Attention asset + Liquidity game.**

Looking at the case of ETH $ASTEROID and SOL/BAGS $ASTEROID, it is quite typical.

The advantages of the BAGS version are very obvious.

It has gained entry into a new narrative: family recognition, real fees, charitable structure, Liv Foundation, high elasticity of Solana.

These factors make it more than just an ordinary copy, but qualify it to challenge ETH as the main asset.

But why is the ETH version still the market’s default main asset?

It’s not because its story is necessarily more touching, and it’s not because it is morally more correct.

It’s because it currently has a stronger liquidity absorption capacity.

Larger market cap.

Deeper pool.

More holders.

Higher trading volume.

More mature market mentality.

Stronger funding absorption capability.

This is the advantage of a main asset.

Many times, the main asset is not the one with the most complete story, but rather the one with the strongest liquidity.

Because the market will ultimately choose the vehicle that can absorb funds the best.

Narratives can fork, emotions can fork, but true large funds will not disperse infinitely.

They will look for the place that can accommodate them the best.

This is also why when the BAGS version surged to over 10% of the ETH version's market cap, controversy suddenly erupted.

Because it’s not just rising.

It is testing one thing:

**Is the market willing to shift part of the liquidity of the ASTEROID narrative to a new asset?**

When it was below 3% or 5%, the ETH version could ignore it.

But when the BAGS version surged above 10%, even approaching 15%, the market began to seriously discuss:

Is it just a branch?

Or is it a new narrative challenger?

Does it have the capacity to absorb new liquidity?

Will it create a dual main asset structure for the ASTEROID narrative?

So, what the BAGS version really needs to prove is not “I’m more touching.”

It needs to prove:

**Not only do I have a new narrative, but I can also attract and accommodate liquidity.**

This is the core.

If BAGS only has family recognition and charitable fees, but fails to generate transactions, the pool isn’t deep enough, the growth of holders stagnates, and funds only enter without staying, then it is at most a highly elastic branch.

But if it can continuously improve liquidity, attract new funds, continuously increase holders, and form transaction depth, then it can upgrade from an "emotional incremental asset" to a "main asset challenger."

This is the most real aspect of the meme world:

The story is responsible for opening the door.

Liquidity determines how far you can go.

Additionally, it’s important to emphasize one point:

**Market cap is not liquidity.**

Many retail investors see a meme with a 100M market cap and assume there really is 100M USD inside.

No.

The market cap of a meme is essentially the marginal transaction price multiplied by the total supply, which is a result amplified by liquidity.

A pool might only have a few million USD in liquidity, but through continuous buying and price increases, it can show a market cap of over a hundred million USD.

So, to judge whether a meme can really grow large, you can't just look at market cap.

You have to consider:

How deep is the pool?

Is the trading volume real?

What is the size of the buy-sell slippage?

Can large players enter and exit?

Is there someone to absorb during a pullback?

Is the number of holders continuously increasing?

Can KOLs and communities bring in new funds?

Is there CEX absorption?

Are there larger exit channels?

These factors determine its true ceiling.

Many memes appear to have high market caps, but in reality, their liquidity is very fragile.

This kind of market can be pulled by operators but may not have the confidence to continue scaling up.

Because the higher it is pulled, the larger the paper profits, but the greater the difficulty of exiting.

This involves the second layer of liquidity:

**Liquidity of the market environment.**

Liquidity is not just created by the operators themselves.

Operators can pull the market, provide liquidity, invite KOL, create emotion, and maintain price.

But if the entire market has no money, risk appetite is very low, on-chain transactions diminish, retail investors are inactive, and CEX is not hot enough, then no matter how strong the operator, they will hit a ceiling.

Because after reaching a certain height, no new funds come in.

At this moment, operators face a realistic problem:

Continue to spend money to maintain consensus, or take advantage of the heat to start unloading?

This is why the same narrative can have completely different market cap ceilings in different market environments.

In a bull market, a strong narrative meme can easily amplify.

In a weak market, even if the narrative is good, it may only rise to a certain height without further liquidity.

It’s not that the story isn’t good enough, but that the market has no money.

So, to judge a meme’s upper limit, you must consider three things at once:

First, is the narrative large enough?

Second, does the project itself have liquidity absorption capacity?

Third, is there enough external liquidity in the entire market?

All three are indispensable.

There’s a third layer, which is the least discussed:

**The exit liquidity for operators.**

For retail investors, buying in is just the beginning.

But for operators, exiting is the end.

The most crucial question for operators managing a meme is not “Can I pull it up?”

But rather:

Once I pull it up, how do I exit?

This is the core of all operations.

The exit channel determines whether operators dare to push the market cap larger.

If they can only exit on-chain, operators must be very cautious.

Because on-chain orders are transparent, the pool depth is limited, and large sell-offs can easily crash the market.

In this case, even if operators have money, they may not dare to pull indefinitely.

Because the higher they pull, the harder it becomes to exit.

If they can go to CEX, the situation changes.

CEX can bring more users, bigger transactions, more complex market-making space, and provide operators more scenarios for distributing chips.

If they can get onto top-tier CEX, the exit channel will further expand.

Because there will be more retail investors, more market makers, more arbitrage funds, and more passive liquidity coming in.

If there is also a contract market, the play becomes even more complex.

Operators can design more complex exit strategies through spot, contracts, market-making, hedging, funding rates, and emotional fluctuations.

So, truly strong operators do not just pull the market.

Truly strong operators design the entrances and exits for liquidity.

The entrance determines how capital comes in.

The exit determines how profits are realized.

This is also why when we look at memes, we cannot just look at the K-line.

The K-line is just the outcome.

More importantly, we need to look at:

Where does its liquidity come from?

Where does its liquidity go?

Who is absorbing?

Who is distributing?

Do operators have an exit channel?

Does this market have the ability to move from on-chain to a larger trading environment?

Returning to ETH ASTEROID and SOL/BAGS ASTEROID.

The advantage of the ETH version right now is not just being the first in narrative, but it has already formed a stronger liquidity structure.

It has a more mature holder base, higher market recognition, and greater funding absorption capacity.

This means that if large funds want to participate in the ASTEROID narrative, the ETH version remains the more natural entry.

And for the BAGS version to challenge ETH, it must complete a liquidity migration.

It cannot rely solely on “family recognition” to continue telling stories.

It must convince the market:

There is enough money coming in.

There is a deep enough pool to absorb it.

There is a strong enough community to take it on.

There is a sufficiently continuous external liquidity.

There are larger future exit channels.

Otherwise, it can only be a highly elastic Beta, not a main asset.

So I believe that the war between ETH and BAGS, on the surface, seems like a narrative war, but in essence, it is a liquidity war.

Whoever can attract more funds in, who can make large funds willing to buy, hold, and increase their positions, is closer to being the main asset.

Operators competing for narrative pricing power will ultimately fall back to liquidity.

Because without liquidity, no matter how good the narrative is, it cannot become a large market cap.

This can be summarized in an equation:

**Meme market cap ceiling = Narrative strength × Market liquidity × Project absorption capacity × Operator exit channel**

Narrative strength determines how many people want to watch.

Market liquidity determines how much money can come in.

Project absorption capacity determines whether capital can come in and be retained.

Operator exit channel determines whether the operator dares to enlarge the market cap.

If only one aspect is strong, it will not go far.

Only narrative, without liquidity, is self-indulgent.

Only liquidity, without narrative, is a trading vehicle.

Only pulling the market, without exit, is the operator's own dilemma.

Only heat, without absorption, is a one-time flow.

Truly large memes must resonate on all four aspects.

So in the future, when we judge a meme, we should not just ask:

Is this story good?

We should also ask:

How much liquidity can this story attract?

How much liquidity can this market accommodate?

Do operators have the capacity to create liquidity?

Does the market environment support a higher market cap?

Finally, where do operators exit?

This is a perspective that is closer to the essence.

A meme does not simply rise based on story.

The story is just the spark.

What truly fuels the fire is liquidity.

And what determines how long and how high this fire can burn is who can continuously bring in new liquidity and design a good final exit channel.

So, in the meme market, narrative determines if you can be seen.

But liquidity determines if you can grow.

With this article finished, I will not express any further opinions on this matter. I hope sharing my core thoughts on memes through $ASTEROID will be helpful to everyone, but ultimately, this is just one person's opinion, not investment advice.

Lastly, I want to say to all meme players: We will eventually enter a phase of abundant liquidity, and at that time, it will be a market blooming with wildflowers.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。