• The 1.3 billion MAU of OpenAI is forming the most valuable consumer entry in human history - users actively open it every day, deeply embed it in workflows, and the switching costs are extremely high. The current $898B pricing only reflects the extrapolation of subscriptions + API "visible revenue", the new advertising revenue line (predicted to be $25B in 2029), the repricing of the C-side platform, and the re-rating effect of GPT-6 have not yet been fully priced in. Bitget preOAI entered at $725 per share, making it the only channel in the retail market that does not require accredited investor qualifications to participate, directly linked to the public market price after the IPO.

What is OpenAI: Three Layers of Revenue, An Actively Opened Consumer Empire

The business of OpenAI cannot be understood with the single framework of "AI company". It is simultaneously a consumer subscription platform (ChatGPT, 900M WAU), developer infrastructure (API, relied on by millions of developers), an enterprise software company (Enterprise, contributing over 40% of revenue), and an emerging advertising and e-commerce platform - four identities forming a vertical closed loop with the consumer entry at its core.

ChatGPT is an app that users actively open, not merely a feature embedded in someone else's product. This distinguishes it fundamentally from Google Gemini (dependent on search/all-in-one distribution) and Anthropic (purely API). The action of 1.3 billion MAU opening it every day constitutes the most difficult distribution moat to replicate in the AI field to date.

Switching costs are not just about changing an app, but about cognitive restructuring. A user who "actively seeks answers" from ChatGPT every day incurs a much higher cost of behavioral pattern restructuring than switching streaming platforms. This habitual moat historically belongs to only a few platforms: Google Search, iPhone, WeChat - their common characteristic is that they eventually entered the trillion-dollar valuation club.

Why OpenAI is Worth Over $1T in the Short Term, Approaching $2T in the Long Term

Short-Term Catalysts

The current benchmark landscape of frontier AI remains fragmented: different models have advantages in various dimensions such as knowledge work, scientific reasoning, coding, and multimodal generation. The core concern in the market recently has been: Is OpenAI losing the narrative premium of "absolute technological leadership"?

But this narrative is being rewritten. OpenAI has released GPT-5.5, officially positioned as its "smartest model yet," further enhancing capabilities for complex tasks such as coding, research, and data analysis; more critically, Image2 / ChatGPT Images 2.0 has performed significantly better than market expectations, creating strong differences in user experience for image generation, editing, text rendering, multilingual support, and practical creative scenarios.

GPT-5.5 + Image2 is already sufficient to constitute a new product cycle: on one hand, it repairs the market narrative of "OpenAI's technological lead being caught up," and on the other hand, it drives consumer engagement, corporate budget reflow, and high-price subscription conversion through stronger multimodal capabilities.

1. GPT-5.5 is released: narrative of technological leadership begins to repair

The significance of GPT-5.5 is not just a routine model upgrade, but rather a direct response from OpenAI to the narrative of "leading advantage being nibbled away by Gemini/Claude" over the past year. The official emphasis on the capabilities of GPT-5.5 in complex tasks, research, coding, and data analysis shows that OpenAI still maintains a strong position in core knowledge work scenarios.

Image2 exceeds expectations: The improvement in image generation and editing capabilities is more easily perceived by ordinary users compared to purely text-based benchmarks, and spreads more easily on social platforms. Image2 may become the core trigger for a new acceleration of ChatGPT WAU.

2. Media cycle explosion → WAU continues to rise

When GPT-4 was released, ChatGPT DAU surged 10 times within a week. GPT-5.5 enhances retention among high-level users, and Image2 draws back ordinary users; the combination of both is expected to drive ChatGPT's active users upward.

3. Corporate budget refocusing back to OpenAI

GPT-5.5 covers professional workflows in research, code, and data analysis, while Image2 covers marketing, design, e-commerce, and content production scenarios. OpenAI's platform attributes are further enhanced, giving corporations more reason to refocus dispersed AI budgets back on OpenAI.

4. Free/Plus → Pro ($200/month) upgrade acceleration

The leap in model capability is the strongest driving force for users to upgrade to paid versions. Each additional million Pro users = $2.4 billion annual ARR increment. If GPT-6 is released in the coming months and achieves leading advantages across all dimensions, it will further reinforce OpenAI's "first" narrative before the IPO.

5. IPO roadshow valuation adjustment → Target of $1T by Q4 2026

OpenAI's capital market story has transitioned from "waiting for GPT-6 to reclaim leadership" to "GPT-5.5 / Image2 have already proven the restart of the product cycle, GPT-6 is additional upside." This is more robust than simply betting on the future release of models and more likely to support higher valuation ranges.

Long-Term Bullish · Long-Term Bull · C-side Super Platform / Consumer Super-Platform

OpenAI is not just an AI company; it is becoming "the default interface for human interaction with information and tasks." Only a few products in history have reached this position: Google Search, iPhone, WeChat - their common characteristic is that they eventually entered the trillion-dollar valuation club.

• ARPU Comparison: The monetization space is complete. OpenAI's current blended ARPU is about $1.5/month ($25B ARR / 1.3 billion MAU); Netflix $15/month; Microsoft 365 $10-25/month; Spotify $10/month; Instagram Ads global average at $3.3/month. The usage depth and frequency of ChatGPT are not lower than any subscription product, yet monetization is only 1/10th that of Netflix. This gap is not a ceiling; it is an opportunity.

Advertising business: the overlooked new revenue line. The advertising test will launch in January 2026, and be fully promoted to US users in February. Internal forecasts estimate $1B in advertising ARR by 2026 and $25B by 2029. The Shopify alliance has successfully completed the closed loop: in-chat shopping has achieved over $100 million ARR within six weeks, taking a 4% commission. With 900 million WAU in advertising inventory, under the global average of Facebook, its implied value exceeds $300B. This revenue line was almost entirely omitted when modeling the $898B valuation.

Segment Valuation: $898B is Below Intrinsic Value

Based on the expected financial data for 2026, forward valuation aims to assess whether the Bitget preOAI entry price of $725 is within a reasonable range and the sources of upside potential.

• Core pricing conclusion: The $725 entry price is almost equal to the SOTP median of $720 - indicating that you are entering at a price close to "only based on visible businesses," while the implied option value of the advertising business of $300B+, the AGI option value, and the repricing of the C-side consumer premium have not yet been counted. $898B is not overvalued; it is undervaluing the new revenue curve.

Pre-IPO Entry: Channel Comparison and Pricing Analysis

OpenAI is a private company, and ordinary investors cannot purchase its equity directly from any public market. The core fact: Series G institutional round equivalent share price of $687.7 ($852B valuation), minimum subscription threshold of $100 million - individual investors, regardless of asset size, cannot participate. Bitget preOAI at $725 per share corresponds to the current latest market valuation of $898B, making it the only accessible channel with secondary market liquidity in the retail market.

Entry Channel Comparison / Access Channel Comparison

Series G · $687.7

Institutional round · Closed

Implied $852B · Closed · Min $100M

Distance to IPO low end / To IPO Low End +17.3%

Distance to long-term target / To LT Target $1.5T +76.1%

SoftBank leads with $122B, minimum $100 million, limited to large institutions. Institutional cost price $687.7 ($852B), current preOAI at $725 corresponds to the latest $898B pricing - the market has repriced OpenAI, and institutions have already gained 5.4% unrealized gains.

Hiive · $608

Real Equity · Accredited Only

Implied $873B · Secondary Transfer

Distance to IPO low end / To IPO Low End +32.7%

Distance to long-term target / To LT Target $1.5T +99.2%

Must meet accredited investor qualifications (net worth ≥ $1 million) and a minimum subscription of $25,000. Private equity transfer, no secondary market, transfer cycles measured in weeks - unable to respond to catalyst events in real time.

preOAI · $725

Bitget IPO Prime · Tokenized · Only Tradeable

$898B · Current latest pricing · No accreditation requirement

Distance to IPO low end / To IPO Low End +11.3%

Distance to long-term target / To LT Target $1.5T +67.0%

The only channel with secondary market availability. Tokenized structure, no accredited investor requirements, no minimum amount restrictions. Can be bought and sold at any time - catalyst events like GPT-6 release, IPO announcement can be traded in real time. Settlement after IPO is directly linked to OpenAI's public market price.

• Liquidity is the core difference: preOAI is a tokenized product, has a secondary market, can be bought and sold at any time - direct trading can occur on price catalysts within weeks of the GPT-6 release. Hiive is a private equity transfer with no secondary market, unable to respond to catalyst events; institutional rounds also lack an exit path. preOAI at $725 is about 5.4% higher than the institutional round at $687.7, corresponding to the current latest $898B market valuation - the entry price reflects the latest consensus on OpenAI's value.

Scenario Analysis and Key Assumptions

Scenario Analysis / Scenario Analysis

Pessimistic Scenario / Bear Case $475—$550 $682B — $790B

GPT-6 underperforms expectations; Gemini substantially erodes market share; advertising monetization damages user trust; IPO undervalued pricing. From preOAI $725, a downside of approximately -12% to -24%. ChatGPT's 1.3 billion MAU provides bottom support.

Benchmark Scenario (Primary Scenario) / Base Case (Primary) $807—$928 $1T — $1.15T

GPT-6 rebuilds leadership, IPO priced at $1T in Q4 2026, advertising scales up gradually, 2026E revenue of $44-50B realized as expected. From preOAI $725, an upside of approximately +11% to +28%, visible within 12 months.

Optimistic Scenario / Bull Case $1,000—$1,200 $1.44T — $1.72T

GPT-6 establishes intergenerational leadership, Agent enterprise ROI proves and accelerates volume growth, IPO oversubscription, advertising reaches $25B ahead of schedule by 2029. From preOAI $725, an upside of approximately +60% to +92%.

※ Main downside risks: ① Google Gemini relies on all-in-one distribution to achieve large-scale follow-up (20% probability); ② Advertising monetization harms user trust leading to WAU shrinkage (10% probability); ③ Agent delivery lag affects Enterprise renewals (15% probability); ④ Governance disputes (10% probability). The aforementioned risks, if occurring independently, have limited impact; bottom support: the user habitual moat of ChatGPT's 1.3 billion MAU will not collapse.

LLM Competitive Landscape: Strategic Differentiation of the Big Three and Long-Term Coexistence

The competition at the layer of large models is not a zero-sum game, but a coexistence of multiple oligarchs - the core user pools targeted by each company are almost non-overlapping. OpenAI's 1.3 billion active users, Anthropic's 1-2 million high-paying developers, and Google's 3 billion all-in-one ecosystem users represent three different infrastructure models in the AI era.

Competitive Landscape / Competitive Landscape

OpenAI

$852B (Institutional Round)

▸ Core Strengths

1.3 billion MAU consumer entry, actively opened, habitual moat; the only entity that can finance on a "national level"; bottom-up culture allows for leapfrogging by genius.

▸ Core Challenges

Coding was "stolen" by Anthropic; over 300 internal projects, execution is fragmented; large C-side traffic creates pre-training burdens.

▸ Long-Term Ceiling

$1.5T+ (Consumer Platform Grade)

Anthropic

Old share implied ~$800B, next round expected $800-850B

▸ Core Strengths

Abandoning C-side all-in coding, organizational execution capacity is a moat; 1-2 million core developers have revenue exceeding OpenAI's 5 million C-side subscriptions; API is transitioning to Agent OS.

▸ Core Challenges

No consumer platform; ceiling is "the best developer tool" rather than "the largest consumer platform."

▸ Long-Term Ceiling

$1.5T+ (Developer OS Grade)

Google / Gemini

Alphabet $2T (AI upside not priced separately)

▸ Core Strengths

Abundant computing power, largest data, unmatched distribution capabilities (3 billion+ ecosystem users); complete advertising infrastructure.

▸ Core Challenges

Benchmark overstated, coding lags by 3-4 months; internal politics are complex, PM culture lacking; always chasing, always half a step behind.

▸ End-Game Prediction

Each in its own place, Google excels in distribution, OpenAI excels in active entry.

• Core Judgment: OpenAI and Anthropic are both long-term companies in the $1.5 trillion range. Different paths, similar endpoints - OpenAI follows the consumer platform path (like Apple/Google), while Anthropic follows the developer OS path (like AWS). The core user pools targeted by the two companies are almost non-overlapping; this is not a zero-sum game, but a parallel evolution of two dominant infrastructure models in the AI era. However, OpenAI's consumer platform premium has not been fully priced by the market - this is the core argument for entering at $725, and a structural mispricing compared to Anthropic.

Disclaimer

This report is for internal research reference and does not constitute investment advice. The tokenized product (preOAI) does not grant shareholder rights, no voting rights, no dividend rights, economic benefits linked to a reference index, and settlement mechanisms depend on platform credit. Private equity (Hiive) is limited to accredited/qualified investors, 3-5% transaction fees, lock-up periods vary based on holding structures. OpenAI's S-1 is in preparation stage, IPO valuation, timing, and issue structure are subject to change. All financial forecasts are analyst estimates, not officially disclosed by OpenAI.

OpenAI — $122B financing announcement · CNBC — Series G $852B · Sacra — OpenAI Equity Research 2026 · Business of Apps — ChatGPT Statistics 2026 · Hiive — OpenAI $608.06 (April 2026) · Polymarket — GPT-6 Release Odds · IndexBox — OpenAI IPO $1T Target 2026 · ALM Corp — ChatGPT Ads $25B 2029 Projection

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。