This case has been judged correctly: violating public order and good customs, you bear the profits and losses yourself, not to be accepted!

However, the most critical facts in the case have not been fully developed:

1⃣ If Chen only gave money to Liu for so-called foreign exchange wealth management, and Liu privately exchanged it for USDT and transferred it to an overseas platform, did Chen know the complete path subjectively?

2⃣ Did the platform really collapse? Or was the money controlled by Liu? Did Liu charge handling fees, rebates, or commissions? Did other dozens of investors suffer the same losses?

3⃣ If the police ultimately determine there is no fraud or illegal fundraising, just ordinary financial loss, what will the plaintiff do?

It feels like the court's current approach of "directly not accepting + transferring to the police" easily becomes: civil matters don't matter, criminal matters don't matter either.

However, this is also the effect that the state wishes to achieve through repeated warnings, making you dare not touch it even if you want to! 😂

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。