Written by: Fang Dao

JPMorgan expects that at the current pace, the Strategy's Bitcoin purchases may reach $30 billion this year. This number itself does not constitute new market information; what is really worthy of revaluation is the capital logic behind it: the Bitcoin corporate holding model is shifting from a "supply freeze narrative" to "capital structure-driven asset operation." In recent years, the core of the Strategy's valuation has not only been its holding of over 810,000 BTC, but rather these holdings have long been viewed by the market as low liquidity, almost permanently locked supply contraction variables. This certainty constitutes an important part of the Bitcoin scarcity narrative and reinforces its long-term valuation logic as a non-sovereign scarce asset.

This framework is changing. For the first time, management has clearly stated that selling Bitcoin can become a capital management tool for dividend payments, financing optimization, and enhancing Bitcoin earnings per share. This means the role of Bitcoin within the corporate structure has changed: it is no longer just a long-term reserve asset but is beginning to enter a dynamic financial management system. This is a typical signal of financialization. Once an asset is incorporated into the corporate capital structure, it is no longer just a store of value but must serve capital efficiency. Financing costs, equity dilution, debt structure, dividend obligations, and asset returns all enter the decision function. Holding itself no longer has ultimate significance; capital return rate becomes the final constraint.

In this sense, the Strategy is currently operating not on simple "buying coin logic," but on a set of highly capital market feedback-dependent asset amplification mechanisms. The core driving variable is the persistent premium of the stock price relative to net assets. The current premium of about 26% NAV allows the company to raise funds by issuing stocks, bonds, and perpetual preferred shares at capital costs lower than the implied return of Bitcoin, and then reallocating those funds into BTC holdings. This constitutes a typical positive feedback structure for capital: the higher the stock price premium, the easier the financing; the easier the financing, the stronger the buying power; the stronger the buying power, the higher the BTC exposure; and the higher the BTC exposure, the stronger the attractiveness of the stocks.

This makes the Strategy more like an asset amplification machine rather than a traditional corporate holding entity. The problem is that this structure inherently relies on capital market conditions. Once the NAV premium shrinks, financing costs rise, and new capital input weakens, the marginal efficiency of this cycle will quickly decline. Therefore, the BTC buying power of the Strategy is not a traditional form of "long-term faith funds," but rather a demand sensitive to capital conditions. This forms a certain contrast with the financialization path of gold.

The pricing logic of gold has long been determined by ETF inflows, central bank allocations, real interest rates, and global risk appetite, with its price reflecting capital allocation more than physical supply and demand. Bitcoin is migrating toward a similar path, but its financialization speed is faster, capital leverage higher, and structural feedback stronger. The difference is that gold's institutionalization is absorption-based allocation, whereas Bitcoin's current institutionalization involves a higher proportion of capital operational attributes. This means Bitcoin is undergoing a transformation of asset attributes: moving from a "scarce asset outside the system" to a "capital tool within the system." The market has previously traded on supply scarcity; it is now beginning to trade on capital structure efficiency. This is why the relaxation of "never selling" is more important than any single sell-off. Because what the market truly loses is not a portion of supply being locked, but the long-term valuation anchor built on the absolute holding assumption. Bitcoin has gained a more mature financial pricing framework, but at the same time, it is also losing part of its original non-financial premium.

References

Benzinga｜JPMorgan on Strategy Bitcoin Accumulation Pace Strategy Q1 2026 Earnings Call TD Cowen Equity Research Update NASDAQ Market Data｜MSTR Trading Metrics

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。