In the U.S. judicial system, the principle is that whoever asserts a claim has the burden of proof.

WLFI, if they claim that Sun sold or shorted WLFI, needs to present evidence such as Binance account level orders, transactions, margin, positions, and actual beneficiaries, rather than requiring Sun to first prove he did not short.

Of course, if the case enters the evidence chain phase, WLFI can request that Sun, Blue Anthem, or relevant third parties disclose transaction records through evidence disclosure, and may also attempt to apply for a subpoena from Binance. But this belongs to the evidence disclosure procedure and does not equate to a reversal of the burden of proof.

Thus, currently relying solely on "transfers to Binance" and "subsequently increasing short OI" can at most form suspicion or inference, but is not sufficient to directly prove that Sun has sold or shorted WLFI.

(Key point: This does not deny that Sun may sell and short, but there is not enough evidence to prove it.)

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。