Hyperliquid is at a critical juncture where institutional accumulation and governance games are intertwined. On May 5, 2026, multiple media outlets citing Onchain Lens data reported that three wallets associated with Multicoin Capital had collectively staked 1.96 million HYPE on-chain, valued at approximately 82.06 million dollars at the time. Besides the staked portion, these addresses still hold 2.83 million HYPE (approximately 118 million dollars), indicating a very high concentration of holdings among core institutions. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid is experiencing fluctuations on the supply side; according to media analysis of Token Unlocks data, about 422,000 HYPE, worth about 17.51 million dollars, are expected to be unlocked on May 5, accounting for about 0.11% of the circulating supply. Alongside a massive flow of funds, the protocol's governance structure is also undergoing significant changes: validators are expected to initiate a vote within 24 hours on whether to delist perpetual contracts such as TST and ZEREBRO. This governance signal has triggered significant on-chain movements; on May 4, a large whale address transferred 900,000 USDC from Bitget and established a substantial long position of over 133.6 million TST on Hyperliquid, achieving unrealized gains of over 1.05 million dollars from a more than 110% increase in TST within the day.

This series of parallel signals indicates that the participant structure in Hyperliquid is undergoing deep differentiation, with the long-term bets of institutions coexisting alongside short-term arbitrage from strategic capital. Particularly regarding the delisting of contracts, the "1-hour TWAP spot oracle price settlement" mechanism is viewed by the market as providing a strategic path for large holdings to avoid slippage and exit at expected prices, highlighting the precise utilization of the protocol's underlying rules by some capital. This article will deeply assess the potential impact of these signals on the Hyperliquid ecosystem and the price trends of related assets from three dimensions: the fundamental data of HYPE staking and unlocking, the settlement rule rehearsal for the delisting vote, and the strategic trading behaviors of large on-chain addresses.

1.96 million HYPE Staked: Institutional Betting Cycle

According to AiCoin monitoring and multiple media reports citing Onchain Lens data, on May 5, 2026, three wallet addresses identified as being associated with Multicoin Capital exhibited significant position changes on-chain, collectively staking 1.96 million HYPE. At the time’s market price, the total value of this staked asset was approximately 82.06 million dollars. This scale of staking not only reflects top institutions' deep penetration into the Hyperliquid ecosystem's power structure but also releases a clear signal for long-term holding at the governance level. Staking HYPE means these addresses will directly participate in the distribution of the protocol’s revenue and potential governance votes, particularly in the current context where Hyperliquid validators frequently make decisions regarding delisting contracts and other core parameters; the weight of large staked positions will be a key variable influencing the evolution of the protocol.

It is noteworthy that these three associated addresses did not adopt an aggressive "full position staking" strategy but rather demonstrated a clear layered allocation approach. While completing the staking of 1.96 million HYPE, the aforementioned wallets still retained a spot position of 2.83 million HYPE on-chain, valued at approximately 118 million dollars. This means that the staked portion only accounts for about 40.9% of their total position, leaving nearly 60% of the assets in a non-staked, liquid state. This configuration provides institutions with significant operational flexibility: on one hand, by staking to anchor the long-term growth dividends of the ecosystem and gain governance seats; on the other hand, retaining a large amount of unstaked capital to respond to market fluctuations or to reserve sufficient buffer space for possible position adjustments, asset collateralization, and liquidity management.

This institutional-level distribution structure serves as an important market stabilizer during the sensitive time frame on May 5 when approximately 422,000 HYPE (valued at about 17.51 million dollars) were unlocked. Although this unlocking amount only accounts for 0.11% of the released supply, the total holdings of addresses associated with Multicoin near 200 million dollars effectively hedge the psychological impact that the small unlocking could bring in narrative terms. While there has been no public disclosure of the cost price of these funds or specific profit distribution arrangements, the choice of significant capital to conduct large-scale staking during a crucial governance period for Hyperliquid itself constitutes a form of endorsement of the on-chain financial infrastructure positioning. This on-chain behavior, based on data transparency, provides a concrete reference sample for the market to observe institutional long-term layouts within the decentralized derivatives track.

17.51 Million Dollars HYPE to Unlock Today: Will Selling Pressure Be Hedged?

While the large staked amounts boost confidence among institutions, Hyperliquid faces a minor supply expansion on the supply side. According to Foresight News, citing Token Unlocks data, Hyperliquid is expected to unlock approximately 422,000 HYPE tokens on May 5, 2026. Based on the market price at the time of reporting, this unlocking amount has a nominal value of about 17.51 million dollars. Although a multi-million dollar amount intuitively seems significant, in terms of supply structure, this unlocking only accounts for 0.11% of the released supply. This extremely low marginal increment means that its direct impact on secondary market liquidity is relatively limited and more serves as a phase-time anchor to trigger market sentiment fluctuations.

When viewed within a broader chip distribution framework, the influence of this unlocking is even weaker. According to Onchain Lens monitoring data, three wallets associated with Multicoin Capital had already staked a total of 1.96 million HYPE on-chain and still held 2.83 million HYPE in spot. This means that the total position of these three associated addresses (approximately 4.79 million HYPE) is more than 11 times the unlocking amount. In the face of such high concentration of chips, the release of 422,000 HYPE appears more like throwing a stone into a large on-chain pool of funds. Currently, public reports have not disclosed the specific recipient of the unlocked tokens—whether they belong to the team, early investors, or are distributed as community rewards, or if there exists a secondary locking agreement—these key pieces of missing information make it difficult for the market to directly characterize their selling pressure attributes.

As of now, on-chain real-time monitoring has not shown any clear selling or abnormal movement trajectories related to this unlocking. Given that HYPE's staking rewards are highly correlated with governance rights of the protocol, whether newly unlocked tokens flow into decentralized exchanges (DEX) creating actual selling pressure or mimic institutional funds entering staking contracts for long-term locked gains needs close attention to the capital flow of relevant addresses. For market observers, the significance of this unlocking lies not in its absolute value but in whether it can be hedged by the currently active on-chain buying or staking demand. In the absence of clear selling evidence, such a small increase in supply is more likely to be viewed as part of the normal release schedule of the protocol rather than a trigger for significant price fluctuations.

TST Soars 110%: Huge Longs Bet on Delisting Vote

While the large staking of HYPE draws attention, the long-tail asset TST within the Hyperliquid ecosystem also experienced exceptionally fierce price fluctuations. According to AICoin data, on May 4, 2026, TST’s daily increase exceeded 110%, reaching the highest level since October 2025. This extreme market behavior is not merely a result of fluctuations in market sentiment but is accompanied by significant large-scale on-chain positioning activities. On-chain monitoring records indicate that just 24 hours before the price explosion, a key address transferred approximately 900,000 USDC from the Bitget trading platform and quickly established a large TST long position in the Hyperliquid contract market.

This cross-platform strategic trade was executed with extreme precision. As of the time of data disclosure, the address held approximately 133.6 million TST long contracts on Hyperliquid, with a nominal value of about 3 million dollars. As TST’s price shot up, the unrealized gains of this position reached approximately 1.05 million dollars, yielding over 50%. Such behavior of mobilizing significant funds in a short period, using cross-platform liquidity for targeted positioning, reflects traders' deep grasp of the governance rhythm of the protocol and strategic gaming.

The core background of this price anomaly lies in the upcoming governance vote of Hyperliquid. Multiple media outlets reported that Hyperliquid validators are expected to vote within 24 hours on whether to delist perpetual contracts such as TST and ZEREBRO. According to the established settlement rules of the protocol, if the vote to delist passes, Hyperliquid will conduct final settlement of the related contracts based on the 1-hour time-weighted average price (TWAP) of the spot oracle price before the official delisting. The design of this settlement mechanism actually provides large holders with a potential arbitrage path to avoid slippage due to insufficient depth and exit at expected prices during specific time windows.

Settlement Based on 1-Hour TWAP: How Are Rules Used by Smart Money?

In Hyperliquid’s protocol design, governance votes not only determine asset access but also directly intervene in the exit path of assets. According to AiCoin data, if Hyperliquid validators vote to delist TST, ZEREBRO, and other perpetual contracts, the protocol will initiate the established settlement process: before the official delisting, forced settlement will occur according to the 1-hour time-weighted average price (TWAP) of the spot oracle price. The intention behind this mechanism is to prevent price manipulation at a single point in time from distorting settlement, but in practice, definitive settlement rules often become "arbitrage nurseries" for large capital to engage in strategic gaming.

The core advantage of this type of settlement is that it provides large holders with a standardized path to avoid slippage and exit at expected prices. Taking TST contracts, which attracted significant market attention on May 4, as an example, on-chain monitoring shows that approximately 24 hours before the relevant delisting news began to propagate, an address transferred about 900,000 USDC from Bitget and swiftly established a large long position of 133.6 million TST on Hyperliquid. As of the reporting time, this position had a nominal value of about 3 million dollars, with unrealized gains exceeding 1.05 million dollars. For such relatively illiquid assets, if it directly closes positions in the secondary market, the significant slippage costs would severely erode profits; whereas utilizing the 1-hour TWAP settlement rule allows large holders to maintain the stability of the spot oracle price during the settlement window to achieve almost "zero loss" profit realization.

This mechanism exhibits a double-edged sword characteristic in extreme market situations, ensuring the orderliness of protocol liquidations while potentially triggering short-term price volatility. Media such as Golden Finance have commented that this event highlights that some smart money is intentionally using the contract design and settlement rules for targeted gaming. When the market expects the vote to definitely pass and the settlement time point is clear, funds often rush to establish positions, pushing up spot prices to elevate the TWAP benchmark, explaining why TST surged over 110% on May 4, reaching a high point since October 2025. Although this type of gaming is primarily limited to specific small coin contracts and has not constituted systemic risk, its challenges to the seriousness of protocol governance and the amplification effect on short-term price volatility have become important variables for observing the governance efficiency of the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Interweaving Long and Short Signals: What to Watch Next for Hyperliquid

In summary of on-chain movements from May 4 to May 5, Hyperliquid presents a complex pattern coexisting with institutional long-term layout and high-frequency strategic gaming. According to AiCoin data, the three wallets commonly labeled by media as "related to Multicoin Capital" have collectively staked 1.96 million HYPE (approximately 82.06 million dollars) and still hold approximately 118 million dollars’ worth of unstaked positions on-chain; this over 200 million dollars' scale of capital accumulation provides a strong credit endorsement and structural support for the ecosystem. However, the upcoming unlocking of 422,000 HYPE (about 17.51 million dollars) on May 5, alongside the governance games surrounding the delisting of TST and ZEREBRO perpetual contracts, introduces short-term uncertainty. Particularly regarding the 1-hour TWAP settlement mechanism before the delisting of the TST contract, whales have already moved 900,000 USDC in advance and established a nominal long position of 3 million dollars on Hyperliquid for strategic gaming, reflecting sharp capital utilization of the protocol’s exit arrangements.

The critical observation point moving forward lies in the dynamic validation of governance decisions and capital flow. First, it is essential to closely monitor the operations of Multicoin-related addresses following the HYPE unlocking window, including whether they continue to increase holdings, withdraw stakes, or transfer funds to exchanges, to judge the stability of institutional investors' positions. Second, the voting outcomes regarding TST and ZEREBRO and subsequent settlement announcements will directly influence the volatility of the related tokens and test whether the project party will adjust the delisting and settlement processes in response to such arbitrage behaviors. Although Hyperliquid has not yet released core parameter adjustments or major risk alerts due to the aforementioned events, investors should clearly differentiate between structural participation signals from institutions and short-term strategic fluctuations based on specific mechanisms. Current market feedback indicates that Hyperliquid has become an important battleground for whales and large capital operations, and its governance mechanism’s maturity and liquidity capacity still require further validation through subsequent actual unlocking and settlement performance.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
AiCoin On-chain: https://aicoin.com/hyperliquid
Exclusive AiCoin Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive AiCoin Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。