In April 2026, the funding curve for the primary market in the crypto sector experienced a rare "gap" not seen in nearly two years: the total amount of crypto VC financing for the month was only around $659–660 million, while that number was still around $2.6 billion in March, reflecting a month-over-month contraction of about 74–75%. Not only did the amount shrink significantly, but the "frequency" of projects securing financing also noticeably cooled — only about 62–63 rounds of financing were completed in April, down from about 84 rounds in March. Viewed in a timeline context, this sharp drop directly pulled the monthly financing scale back to its lowest level since July 2024, meaning that the slight warming trend that had just emerged at the beginning of the year was quickly pressed on pause by a more conservative capital attitude.

At almost the same time, the traditional commodity market also gave a similar signal. On May 1, 2026, WTI crude oil futures fell 3.11% to $101.804 per barrel, while Brent crude oil futures dropped 1.55% to $108.6 per barrel. With the sharp decline in crypto VC financing in April followed by a significant weakening of international oil prices in early May, this cross-market data was viewed in the brief as a resonance of risk preference — capital was shrinking both on-chain and off-chain, suggesting an overall retreat in market risk preference, becoming an unavoidable starting point for observing the subsequent cycle.

Financing Cliff: The Ice and Fire Contrast of $660 Million vs. $2.6 Billion

When placing March and April 2026 on the same table, the sense of the gap is very intuitive: the total amount of crypto VC financing in March was about $2.6 billion, with multiple media outlets reporting similar figures; by April, this number plummeted to about $659–660 million, leaving only about a quarter of the previous month's total. In terms of amount, the month-over-month decline was about 74–75%, indicating not just a "cooling" but approaching a stark break, as the funding curve experienced a steep decline not seen in more than a year on a monthly dimension.

From a time series perspective, this is not an isolated low point but rather the lowest monthly financing scale since July 2024, directly interrupting the market's optimistic interpretation of "warming at the start of the year." March 2026 reached a phase high of about $2.6 billion in terms of amount, and the number of financing rounds was also around 84, reflecting a relatively active fundraising environment at one point; while in April, as the total dropped to around $660 million, the number of financing rounds also shrank to about 62–63, with both amount and rounds declining simultaneously, signaling that capital was not only compressing single ticket sizes but was overall reducing engagement frequency.

Widening the perspective to the entire year, the cliff-like April also changed the distribution structure of funds in 2026 to date. According to a single-source statistic, the total cumulative crypto VC financing since 2026 is about $5.64 billion (accounting standards may vary, same below). Under this accounting approach, March alone accounted for about $2.6 billion, nearly half of the year's total; while April's approximately $660 million makes up just over 10% of the total. In other words, within the same annual cycle, funds concentrated and rapidly expanded in one month, then abruptly shrank in the following month, quickly overshadowing the brief warming signals from earlier in the year; this rhythm appears more as a concentrated correction of the optimistic sentiment from the previous phase rather than a smooth transition.

Project Number Cools: 62 Rounds vs. 84 Rounds Contrast

If the total financing amount dropping from about $2.6 billion to about $660 million reflects a "ticket" contraction, then the decrease in financing rounds from approximately 84 in March to about 62–63 in April directly reveals the retreat in trading activity itself — this is not a matter of individual checks getting smaller, but rather a comprehensive reduction in the number of projects receiving checks. Looking at the number of rounds, April had over 20 fewer rounds than March, a decrease close to a quarter, and alongside an approximate 74–75% month-over-month nosedive in total amounts, the frequency also correspondingly fell, indicating that this round of adjustment was not merely caused by the absence of a few large projects but showed a slowdown in the overall pace from early to mid-stage projects.

In a more detailed breakdown of sectors, funds have not completely "shut off," but rather distinctly consolidated towards a few directions: in April, DeFi completed around 12 rounds of financing, remaining one of the most active sectors; blockchain services and AI-related projects each secured around 8 rounds, forming a second tier alongside DeFi. This structure suggests that under the condition of a significantly reduced total pool, capital is more willing to concentrate its firepower on sectors with clear income expectations or technical service attributes, while displaying much more caution towards other themes — the drop in project numbers accompanies a tightening of sector preferences, rather than a blanket reduction across the board.

From the perspective of deploying institutions, the characteristic of "still investing, but more selective" can also be observed. Reports indicate that the market-making firm GSR's venture capital department participated in about 4 investments in April, while traditional accelerators like Y Combinator also appeared in several rounds. Leading funds and established institutions have not collectively exited the market but are maintaining a small number of engagements in a noticeably reduced environment, which corroborates the trend of financing rounds dropping from 84 to 62–63: the capital pool still exists but at a lower water level, with tighter gates, meaning that projects must undergo more scrutiny, making it more challenging compared to the concentrated expansion period in March.

Oil Prices Dropping: Commodities Also Cooling Risk

In response to the "cliff" in financing in April, there was also a noticeable price retreat in the commodity sector. On May 1, 2026, WTI crude oil futures closed at $101.804 per barrel, marking a daily drop of about 3.11%; on the same day, Brent crude oil futures closed at $108.6 per barrel, down about 1.55% (both figures from a single source). While prices themselves remain in the three-digit range, such a daily drop is enough to indicate that not only high Beta crypto equity assets are under pressure, but commodities represented by crude oil are also undergoing a “risk-down adjustment” process. The brief also noted that in early May, commodity prices generally retreated, with the market appearing to uniformly price in declining demand or risk preferences, rather than isolated volatility in specific varieties.

If we interpret the drop of crypto VC financing from about $2.6 billion in April to $659–660 million as a contraction of risk capital, then the simultaneous weakness in oil prices on May 1 provides a side confirmation from another asset class: risk preference is tightening across markets. On one end, the financing rounds for early, high-uncertainty crypto projects dropped from 84 to 62–63, with investors becoming more selective; on the other end, crude oil futures, seen as a barometer of macro demand and risk sentiment, gave a downward price signal outside of risk assets. The combined picture shows that capital is not only shrinking exposure to on-chain equity assets but is also refraining from betting on optimism with higher prices for commodities that are highly correlated with expectations for physical demand.

It should be emphasized that currently, there is no widely verified and sufficiently robust single explanation for the specific driving factors behind the oil price drop on May 1. The brief explicitly states that this adjustment should not be simply attributed to a certain piece of news, such as a specific geopolitical event or daily inventory data, in the absence of evidence. A more cautious statement would be: in the combination of the dive in crypto VC financing and the general decline in commodity prices in early May, the market's expectations for future demand and risk returns exhibit a conservative tendency, but this tendency itself still needs to be validated by subsequent data and market performance over a longer period and cannot be hastily interpreted as a certain macro turning point.

Risk Revaluation: How Liquidity Concerns Squeeze Fundraising

When the market begins to trade based on the expectation that "things will be tighter in the future," risk assets will not wait for actual changes in interest rates or on-balance sheet liquidity to react. The drop in April crypto VC financing from about $2.6 billion to $659–660 million, alongside a 74–75% month-over-month decline, while oil prices weakened significantly in early May, has been interpreted by many as two ends of the same logical chain: one end is the drop in commodity prices, reflecting concerns about terminal demand and economic momentum; the other end is the compression in fundraising for high-risk assets, reflecting investors beginning to reassess risk returns and valuation levels. In other words, even if the nominal stock of funds has not been significantly withdrawn, the consensus itself that "future liquidity may tighten" is enough to prompt earlier capital withdrawal.

In this expectation environment, the contraction of capital allocation is layered. As macro uncertainty rises, what’s usually cut first are not the projects nearing exit stages, but early-stage targets whose technologies and models are still being validated: these types of projects highly depend on funding, have long return cycles, and their valuations are highly sensitive to discount rates and risk premiums. While financing amounts plummeted in April, the rounds also decreased from around 84 in March to 62–63, demonstrating that this is not simply the absence of a few large projects, but rather a simultaneous contraction in overall engagement numbers and ticket sizes. Even in sectors like DeFi, blockchain services, and AI that still have relatively more rounds, funding is concentrated more on a few projects deemed capable of surviving in a "more expensive" funding environment, reflecting a risk management mindset of "better to miss than to misplace."

It should be emphasized that discussions around "whether we have entered a new round of capital winter" remain at the level of judgment and expectation. Currently, what can be verified is merely that the financing scale in April hit a new low since July 2024, the environment that briefly warmed at the beginning of the year is under pressure again, and all of this is occurring within a broader backdrop of falling risk preference. Whether this indicates the onset of a long-term contraction phase similar to the last cycle, or merely a phase adjustment under liquidity expectation disturbances, can only be answered by subsequent months of financing data and must not be hastily characterized as a "structural turning point" that has already arrived.

Capital Winter Uncertain: The Next Few Months Will Provide Answers

The financing low points of about $659–660 million and 62–63 rounds in April, in conjunction with the roughly 74–75% month-over-month cliff from about $2.6 billion and 84 rounds in March, compounded with WTI dropping to $101.804 per barrel and Brent to $108.6 per barrel on May 1, indeed provide a clear signal of "cross-asset risk preference cooling." However, whether "we have entered a new round of capital winter," or whether "innovation capacity has been impaired" and "the downturn cycle has already materialized," can currently only be viewed as market sentiment and interpretive assessments, rather than validated conclusions — especially given that the cumulative financing scale since 2026 is still approximately $5.64 billion (and accounting standards may vary). Defining the entire cycle based on single-month data remains insufficient evidence.

What truly matters is whether the key observational indicators over the next few months will point in a consistent direction: first, will the total monthly financing amount significantly recover from the April low point, or will it continue to hover below one billion; second, will the structure of rounds and individual ticket sizes continue to shrink, and how will the proportion of early-stage projects and large growth rounds change; third, will funding further concentrate on a few sectors like DeFi, blockchain services, and AI, or will there be a more dispersed allocation; fourth, will the trend of commodities, especially oil prices, consistently provide a risk preference signal aligned with crypto financing? For investment and business decision-making, the already occurred financing and price data are objective facts, while the narratives of "winter" or "turning point" are merely subjective projections of those facts. Clearly separating the two and avoiding amplifying a one-time fluctuation into a long-term trend might be more important in the high-noise environment over the next few months than betting on a single macro story.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefit group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefit group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。