On April 30, 2026, the London Financial District welcomed a document considered by the industry as a "turning signal." The UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) officially released policy statement PS26/7, providing final guidance on the use of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) for fund tokenization. Rather than being a completely new "crypto rule," it is more of a rewritten footnote to the existing system—PS26/7 did not overturn the existing fund regulatory framework, but instead detailed how asset management companies and related institutions can bring fund shares onto the chain and connect operational processes to DLT within existing rules. The document was jointly formulated by the FCA and industry participants, meaning that regulators are no longer just spectators of technological experiments, but are actively incorporating technology into the regulatory landscape.

What truly draws attention is the "Direct-to-Fund" (D2F) model included at the rule level in the guidance: investors are allowed to trade, subscribe, and redeem directly with the fund. This mechanism can serve both traditional funds and funds in tokenized forms. However, the regulatory stance is exceptionally restrained—the legitimacy of D2F lies not in "disintermediation" or "subversion," but in enhancing transaction and circulation efficiency within controllable boundaries. PS26/7 clearly conveys the posture of "increasing efficiency without relaxing regulation": the FCA continues the exploration of DLT through tools such as regulatory sandboxes, synthesizing experimental experiences into a set of implementable compliance standards. Against the backdrop of international competition in advancing fund tokenization rules in jurisdictions like the EU, Singapore, and Hong Kong, the UK chose to signal with this document: in the next round of upgrading asset management infrastructure, it aims to gain the initiative in the convergence of traditional funds and crypto technology.

Regulatory Initiative: FCA Draws a Line for Tokenized Funds

This time, the FCA did not present a set of entirely new rules but chose to personally integrate "DLT" and "tokenization" into the compliance explanation within the existing fund regulatory framework. PS26/7 is clearly positioned as an explanatory document: it tells asset management companies, distribution channels, and technology service providers how to legally use DLT for fund tokenization under the existing system, rather than announcing a large migration of regulatory paradigms. For the market, this means the regulator has taken the initiative to draw lines—underlying logic and risk boundaries remain unchanged; only the permissible technical means to complete the same regulated business have changed.

Why does the FCA want to take the initiative? On one hand, DLT in the global asset management industry has moved from "concept validation" to "production pressure": the reality of compressed settlement cycles and efficiency improvement has made it clear to UK regulators that if they choose silence, innovation will grow in gray areas that are hard to control in terms of pace and risk. Through PS26/7, the FCA clarifies what is permissible and under what framework it can be done, using a citable document to reduce compliance uncertainty and bringing industry exploration back to a predictable and overseable track. On the other hand, as jurisdictions in the EU, Singapore, Hong Kong, and elsewhere rush to introduce their versions of tokenized fund rules, London must not only speak of an "open attitude" to retain asset management and technology institutions but must also provide a sufficiently stable institutional commitment: you can venture into this field without stepping on invisible red lines.

Significantly, this guidance was not written in isolation by regulators and then handed to the market but was co-developed by the FCA and industry participants. According to the limited information disclosed in the briefing, this collaborative drafting itself is a signal: the rules for tokenized funds are not merely about regulators "controlling" new technology but about designing feasible pathways in collaboration with actual operators. PS26/7 does not release specific technical terms in the briefing, which means that true micro-requirements still need the market to study the original text and explore through practice. However, at the macro level, the UK has already provided an answer—innovation here will not stray from regulation; instead, it will be incorporated into a predictable and iteratable framework, precisely the starting point London wants to use to compete for the discourse power in the next round of asset management infrastructure upgrades.

Direct-to-Fund Trading: A Boost for Subscription and Redemption

After establishing the macro framework, the specific lever thrown by the FCA in PS26/7 is "Direct-to-Fund" (D2F). Its intuitive meaning is simple: investors are no longer just a string of instructions relayed through intermediaries, platforms, and backend institutions but can now directly subscribe and redeem fund shares from the fund itself—whether the fund exists in a traditional form or has been tokenized. There are still intermediaries, but the design of the transaction path reduces multiple forwarding and fragmentation into a straight line, allowing funds to take fewer detours before reaching the fund's asset pool; the goal is to shorten turnaround times and minimize reconciliation and error margins.

When this straight line is combined with DLT, the story begins to change fundamentally. Shares are recorded and updated in distributed ledgers or other digital systems, and funds instructions flow on the same technological foundation, meaning that "trading, accounting, and settlement" have the chance to be integrated into the same time window, rather than placing an order today, confirming it tomorrow, and finally seeing it in the system the day after. For an industry under pressure to shorten settlement cycles and improve efficiency, this potential for synchronization points to the underlying direction of infrastructure upgrades that PS26/7 is really aiming for—it does not write technical details in the briefing, yet it has already set the imaginative boundaries for transformation.

The real impact will land on several types of institutions. For asset management companies, D2F is not simply about adding another subscription entry; it requires redesigning the direct connection interface with investors, liquidity management, and risk control processes: when money flows faster, and information is more transparent, product operating rhythms will be forced to accelerate. Distribution channels will face pressure to redefine their roles—from "pipelines for receiving orders" to "the front end of customer relationships and asset allocation," explaining tokenized forms, D2F pathways, and risk characteristics, maintaining presence through service rather than process. Backend service providers will need to find new value points in the compressed process chain: upgrading traditional advantages like reconciliation and batch processing into system integration, data services, and operational outsourcing around DLT and tokenization. The signal released by the FCA through PS26/7 is clear: whoever can first successfully navigate this new pathway of "Direct-to-Fund with DLT as the underlying" will seize the opportunity to gain a new voice in the next round of asset management infrastructure reshuffling.

From Sandbox to Implementation: London Aims to Maintain Its Asset Management Throne

This new pathway of "Direct-to-Fund with DLT as the underlying" is not a sudden flash of insight by the FCA in 2026 but has been repeatedly refined in the regulatory sandbox. In recent years, UK regulators have used the sandbox to bring asset management institutions, custodians, and technology companies into the same closed environment, allowing them to test various uses of DLT in registration, share circulation, and instruction transmission under controlled risks. Regulators have closely observed the advantages and shortcomings of the technology and identified which segments can genuinely enhance efficiency and which are merely gimmicks. The PS26/7 released on April 30, essentially writes these experimental "informal consensus" into formal regulatory discourse: within the existing fund framework, which uses of DLT are permitted and how they can be employed, even if the details are not yet fully laid out.

The problem is that London no longer has the luxury of exclusive experimental time. While the UK explores DLT in its sandbox, jurisdictions like the EU, Singapore, and Hong Kong are also accelerating the launch of regulatory rules for fund tokenization or digital asset funds, attempting to attract global asset managers to establish new products and processes locally with clearer access paths. For London, which prides itself on being a "global asset management center," this is no longer just a matter of technical route selection; it's a battle for its status: if the routes for capital flows, operating standards, and service ecosystems in the DLT era are first defined by other financial centers, the traditional "asset management throne" will inevitably be re-evaluated. The true motivation behind PS26/7 is to regain proactive control over the rules and signal to the global industry that "London is also the preferred base for tokenized funds" with a set of written guidance.

The driving force behind major financial centers betting on DLT is not simply an obsession with new technology but the hard constraints facing the traditional fund industry: major global markets are migrating to T+1 settlement, continuously compressing the time left for backend reconciliation, fund allocation, and share confirmation, while operational costs remain high. Within this complex chain, any slowdown or error at an intermediary node will be magnified in shorter settlement cycles. DLT and tokenization are frequently mentioned in national briefings because they are seen as one of the few tools likely to simultaneously solve the challenges of "speeding up settlement" and "reducing operational costs." Whoever can be the first to write DLT into formal rules locally and make fund share tokenization a scalable path will have the opportunity to firmly lock in capital flows, talent, and technology supply chains within their city in the next generation of asset management infrastructure competition. For London, PS26/7 is that step from the sandbox to implementation, as well as a proactive move to maintain its throne.

Innovation Without Crossing Lines: Regulatory Red Lines and Pending Details

Moving from the sandbox to regulatory implementation, the FCA has not provided a "full preparation" operational manual. Current publicly available briefings remind the market that PS26/7 remains "blank" on several key technological aspects—whether regarding the types of DLT that may be used, the specific scope of tokenized assets, or arrangements for custody and registration, the briefing does not disclose terms-level requirements. For asset management companies, custodians, and technology service providers, the true answers can only be gleaned by studying the original text of PS26/7 line by line, rather than filling in the blanks through second-hand interpretations. More importantly, the briefing also clearly prohibits the external parties from independently completing the technical details, including whether a certain architecture or accounting method is adopted or even whether “DLT is used directly to maintain the holder register,” the so-called "Blueprint model," "limited purpose stablecoin," and other popular concepts listed under "to be validated," cannot be considered established facts already written into the rules.

Equally prone to misinterpretation is the boundary of this guidance itself. The positioning of PS26/7 is to explain how to compliantly use DLT and tokenization technology within the existing fund regulatory framework, rather than building an entirely new system or granting wide-ranging freedom for all crypto assets. It releases a signal of "technological upgrades that can be carried out within controllable boundaries," rather than a license saying "any on-chain asset can be packaged into regulated products." Even the much-anticipated D2F model is introduced only as a new pathway for "direct-to-fund," yet it explicitly lists “whether D2F allows investors to bypass AFM” among pending verification items, reminding the market not to jump to conclusions prematurely.

Because of this, several unresolved issues surrounding PS26/7 that attract the most attention—the embedding of D2F in existing issuance and redemption processes, how DLT registration aligns or connects with traditional registration systems, and which types of assets are suitable for initial tokenization—currently remain on the list of questions rather than on the list of answers. The briefing also does not provide any public quotes from FCA officials or industry representatives, nor does it present quantitative data such as "fund flows on the date of release," leaving only a broad outline of the regulatory framework and a plethora of details still needing to be filled. At this moment, overly optimistic interpretations are as much to be wary of as overly pessimistic imaginations: what will truly matter next are the pilot pathways instituted by organizations after interpreting the original text and how the FCA gradually clarifies red lines and fills in the blanks in practice.

The Fund World is Pressed Refresh: Who Will Reap the First Dividend

For UK asset management institutions, PS26/7 feels more like the sound of a gun saying "you can start now" rather than a pre-written answer sheet. It does not build an entirely new regulatory system but explains how DLT and tokenization can compliantly land within existing fund rules, meaning that traditional players have not been excluded but are named as protagonists: whoever dares to conduct a small-scale pilot fund in tokenized form on the current product line, whoever dares to introduce a "direct-to-fund" redemption process in certain channels, could potentially first understand the regulatory tolerance boundaries and operational details, seizing a voice in the future larger-scale transition. However, the specific pace ultimately returns to each institution's risk appetite and technological preparedness; there is no timetable or hard milestones, and delay can also be a choice.

Technology suppliers, on the other hand, face another challenge: moving from "discussing concepts" to "writing into flowcharts." The FCA has released a clear policy signal but has not promised any short-term market scale, and the briefing does not show data indicating immediate inflows or instant product listings, forcing tech stakeholders to collaborate with asset management companies, custodians, and distribution partners to create auditable, risk-controllable solutions that can be formally written into compliance documents in the real-world scenario where traditional registration and settlement systems coexist with DLT architectures. The ones who truly reap the first dividends won't be the loudest narrators but those who are the first to finalize the “compliance terms—technical architecture—business model” closed loop and are willing to continuously refine it amidst regulatory adjustments. From a global perspective, this move by London will be continuously benchmarked by other financial centers: if pilot tokenized funds and parallel infrastructure models prove effective, it could become a new focal point for the global crypto financial ecosystem's competition for growth; if progress is blocked, it will likely provide negative case studies for future entrants. Opportunities are written into the rules, but uncertainties lurk in the execution, and the outcome will quietly be rewritten in the details of each specific implementation.

Join our community to discuss together and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。