Written by: Jtsong.eth (Ø, G)
The crypto industry has always talked about Mass Adoption, but in reality:
Users remain transaction users, not "usage users".
And AI has the potential to help blockchain achieve true 'value deposition'.
Introduction: When Users Transition from "Human" to "AI"
If we honestly look at the crypto industry over the past decade, we will find a simple yet often overlooked fact: the products of the crypto industry have essentially been "serving humanity." This is also the core driving force behind one bull market after another.
And what is humanity?
- Profit-seeking
- Gambling mentality
- Leverage preference
- Short-term feedback dependence
Thus, the entire industry has naturally evolved the most successful model:
Issuing assets + Trading + PVP (Game Theory)
From ICOs, to DeFi Summer, to NFTs, to Memecoins, they are essentially revolving around:
- "Can I buy early?"
- "Can I sell quickly?"
- "Can I earn the money that others lose?"
Under the premise that "users are human", this logic is not only reasonable but also optimal.
Because:
No mechanism can drive user growth more than the "profit expectation".
But the problem lies in the ceiling of this system, which has been predetermined from the beginning. Because it relies on:
- Human irrationality
- Market emotional fluctuations
- The constant influx of new funds
Once these factors weaken, the entire system will quickly lose momentum. The current overall market is bearish because old investors are becoming more rational while new funds are not entering freely.
A more critical change is occurring
In the past, we defaulted:
Blockchain users = Humans
But in the future, this equation may be completely rewritten:
Primary users of blockchain = AI Agents
When AI starts to become the main participant on the chain, everything will change.
Humans vs AI: Two Completely Different "User Profiles"
Human users:
- Driven by emotions
- Preference for high risk and high return
- Tolerance for uncertainty
- Easily influenced by narratives
AI users:
- Do not engage in gambling
- Not driven by emotions
- Pursue certainty and efficiency
Require credible data and execution environments
This means:
The "casino model" is ineffective for AI.
AI does not experience FOMO; it only does three things:
- Calculate
- Execute
- Optimize
The True Value of Blockchain is Redefined
When the service target shifts from "humans" to "AI", the core value of blockchain will also transform:
From:
- Asset issuance
- Liquidity
- Speculation
To:
- Determinism
- Verifiability
- Trustless Execution
And these three points are precisely the "fundamental needs" of AI systems.
Why is this critical?
Because there exists a fundamental problem within AI systems:
Black Box
- Model decisions are not interpretable
- Data sources are not verifiable
- Inference processes are not auditable
This can be tolerated in the Web2 world, but when it involves:
- Financial decisions
- Automated trading
- Agent collaboration
- Data assets
These issues become systemic risks.
Blockchain provides a solution:
Bringing key AI processes "on-chain"
- Data sources are verifiable
- Inference results are provable
- Behavior records are traceable
This is not merely a "bonus", but rather:
The necessary infrastructure for the large-scale deployment of AI.
An important conclusion
When the primary users of the crypto industry are still humans:
Playing to human nature is correct.
But when the main users begin to change to AI:
Playing to certainty is the only solution.
And that is also why:
The Mass Adoption of the next generation of the crypto industry is essentially a process of "de-casinoization".
The Prosperity of the Casino Model is Essentially a Short-term Structural Dividend
We must admit that the casino model is successful.
It possesses several strong advantages:
- Strong user motivation (profit expectations)
- High liquidity turnover (high-frequency trading)
- Low understanding threshold (buying up or down)
But these advantages also represent its ceiling.
Where is the Bottleneck of the Casino Model?
If we extend the timeline, the casino model will gradually expose several inevitable problems:
1. User growth is unsustainable (relies on the "new investors" model)
The casino model is essentially PVP, not PVE.
In other words:
The profits of some must be built on the losses of others.
This directly leads to:
- User growth is highly dependent on "new funds"
- Once new user growth slows down, the system begins to become insular
- Retention is extremely low; the vast majority of users are one-time participants
Eventually forming a typical structure:
"Traffic driven → Bubble expansion → Liquidity depletion → Price collapse"
2. Unable to deposit long-term value (no "productive" aspect)
The casino model creates little real value, only value transfer.
In comparison:
- Web2 creates information, content, network effects
- AI creates productivity and automation capabilities
While most crypto applications:
Are merely "more efficient speculative tools"
This leads to a core problem:
Capital can enter but will not stay long-term.
3. Regulatory pressure is inherently present
When the core activities of an industry are:
- High-frequency trading
- Leverage
- Speculation
Then it will inherently be classified as:
A financial risk system, rather than a technological innovation system
This is also why globally:
- Exchanges are heavily regulated
- Token issuance is continuously scrutinized
- DeFi has always been in a gray area
The more successful the casino model, the stronger the regulation.
4. Product experience cannot break through
The vast majority of "casino-type products" have one problem:
- Strong financial attributes
- High risk perception
- High learning costs
For Web2 users:
There is no need to take on complexity + risk for "potential profit"
So the crypto industry has been talking about Mass Adoption, but in reality:
Users remain transaction users, not "usage users".
The Real Breakthrough: Shifting from "Financial System" to "Productivity System"
If the past crypto industry solved:
"How to trade value more efficiently"
Then the next stage must solve:
"How to create new value"
And this answer likely comes from:
AI × Blockchain
The essence of AI is a productivity tool, while the essence of blockchain is:
- Rights confirmation
- Settlement
- Verifiability
The core meaning of combining the two is:
To allow both the "production process" and the "production results" to be recorded, verified, and assetized.
This is a completely different path from the casino model.
A Key Paradigm Shift: From "Trading Assets" to "Generating Assets"
In the past:
- Tokens were financing tools
- NFTs were collectibles
- User behavior = Trading
In the future:
- Data is an asset
- Models are assets
- The behavior of AI Agents is also an asset
User behavior will shift to:
Create → Use → Reuse → Earn
Rather than simple buying and selling.
Case Study: How 0G Labs Turns "Memory" into Assets
Taking 0G as an example, we can see a very different path.
One of the core modules of 0G is decentralized storage + AI computation, which brings a very critical capability:
On-chain AI Memory
What does this mean?
In traditional AI systems:
- User data is stored on a platform
- AI's "memory" is non-transferable
- All value belongs to the platform
But in an architecture like 0G:
- User interaction data can be recorded on-chain
- AI's memory can become verifiable, ownable assets
- Different applications can share the same "memory layer"
This directly brings several changes:
1. Memory becomes an asset (Memory as Asset)
Your:
- Usage habits
- Preferences
- Data trails
Are no longer just "data utilized by the platform", but rather:
Assets that you can own, authorize, and even monetize
2. AI Agents have an "inheritable state"
Traditional AI:
- Every application is an island
- Context is not transferable
But on-chain:
AI Agents can share memories across applications
This means:
- AI is no longer a one-time tool
- But rather a "continuously growing digital entity"
3. New business models begin to emerge
When "memory" can be assetized:
- Data markets
- Agent economy
- Personalized AI services
Will all become a true PVE (value creating) system
Rather than PVP.
Conclusion: The Essence of Mass Adoption is "De-Casinoization"
For the crypto industry to truly move to the next stage, it must undergo a fundamental transformation:
From:
Asset issuance + Trading-driven
To:
Productivity-driven + Value creation
That is:
De-Casinoization
This does not mean that trading will disappear, but rather:
- Trading is no longer core
- Speculation is no longer the only entry point
- Users are no longer just "gamblers", but "creators"
The last generation of the crypto industry made money flow.
The next generation of the crypto industry will create value.
And AI may be the most important variable on this road.
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。