1. It suddenly started charging money, but you might not have noticed at all

You may have seen pages like this:

• “Probability of Trump winning the 2024 election: 51.3%”
• “Probability of the Fed cutting rates in March: 68.7%”
• “LPL Spring Finals, BLG's championship odds: 1.39”

This is not a gambling website or media commentary, but a special entity in the Web3 world - the prediction market.

In simple terms, it is a mechanism to "vote" with real money: if you believe something will happen, you buy a “yes” contract; if you believe it won’t happen, you buy a “no” contract. Prices fluctuate in real-time, and the final number is the “collective judgment” made with money by thousands of people.

Polymarket is currently the most popular, actively traded, and most cited on-chain prediction platform globally. By providing a clean webpage, users can trade directly using USDC stablecoin.

On January 6, 2026, it quietly updated its official website, adding a page called “Transaction Fees” in the documentation, and announced: starting today, markets for "15-minute cryptocurrency price fluctuations" will charge fees, up to 3%.

Upon hearing this news, many long-time users first reacted: “Huh? Wasn’t it free before? What did it rely on to survive?”

This question precisely touches on a commonly overlooked truth in the Web3 world: for a seemingly cool technology product to truly survive, it has never depended solely on code and ideals.

2. It got popular because of hot topics, but its survival is determined by regulation

Polymarket really has been hot several times:

• During the 2022 Qatar World Cup, users bet on “Argentina winning,” and contract prices skyrocketed;
• In the 2023 LPL Spring Split, esports fans traded team victories and defeats in real-time on the platform;
• In the 2024 U.S. presidential election, daily trading volume peaked at over 2.7 billion dollars, and even the New York Times cited it as a source.

But what really determines whether it can continue operating has never been these lively events, but two words: regulation.

Founded in 2020, Polymarket quickly secured support from renowned venture capital firms like Founders Fund under Peter Thiel and once planned to expand across the United States. But in January 2022, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued an enforcement order to directly halt:

The "Real Madrid vs Barcelona who wins" and "Will the Fed cut rates" binary contracts it offered are classified as regulated swap transactions and require either a “Designated Contract Market” (DCM) or “Swap Execution Facility” (SEF) license - which it did not have.

The result? Polymarket was fined 1.4 million dollars and shut down all compliance-risk markets aimed at U.S. users. On the surface, it appeared to withdraw, but in reality, it was a strategic contraction: relocating its main operations outside the U.S., transitioning to on-chain settlement, while still providing services globally - including to U.S. users.

Interestingly, exiting the U.S. market has instead made it even more prominent.

During the 2024 election period, it became an "unofficial dashboard" for global observers tracking public opinion changes; media checked it before writing articles, traders referenced it in modeling, and researchers analyzed public sentiment using its API.

And the real turning point came in November 2025: the CFTC officially approved its DCM application. This means - it is no longer an “innovative project on the edge of legality,” but has obtained a “formal badge” from the U.S. financial regulatory system.

This charging was not a spur-of-the-moment decision, but the first action taken after obtaining that badge.

3. It was free for six years, not because it had no money to make, but because it was waiting for an opportunity to make money safely

You might not know: the vast majority of prediction markets have long been charging transaction fees - with common rates between 0.5% to 3%. But since Polymarket launched in 2020, it has imposed zero fees for all users and all markets.

This sparked many speculations: is it surviving on venture capital? Selling data? Relying on big backers to cover losses?

In fact, the answer is more pragmatic: it is betting on a time window.

The value of the prediction market does not lie in how much can be made in a single transaction, but in whether there are enough people participating frequently, which can create real, stable, and credible price signals. And “zero fees” is the most direct and effective way to attract users.

After six years, it successfully achieved three things:

• In political, sports, and cryptocurrency events that garner high attention, it became the de facto “default pricing center”;
• Its price data has been repeatedly cited by Bloomberg terminals, academic papers, and hedge fund strategies, forming de facto standards;
• Accumulated several years of complete probability datasets across cycles, events, and regions - this is a competitive moat that no new platform can buy.

In other words, it has exchanged the money it should have collected for something even more valuable: liquidity, voice, and data assets.

The charging on January 6, 2026, is precisely the natural outcome of this long-term layout:

• Only targeting high-frequency, short-term markets that are easily manipulated by bots, such as “15-minute cryptocurrency fluctuations”;
• Dynamic fee rates: the closer the price is to 50% (less certain), the higher the fee; the closer it is to 0% or 100% (more certain), the lower the fee, even to zero;
• All fees do not go into the platform's pocket but are fully returned in USDC to the market makers (those providing buy and sell quotes);
• The goal is very practical: to incentivize more people to place orders, narrow the bid-ask spread, and enable quick transactions even during sudden drops or surges.

Some say it is to combat high-frequency trading bots, others think it is to filter out false trading, while some point out - this is essentially a stress test: verifying whether the fee mechanism can improve market quality within regulatory limits, rather than damage user experience.

It hasn't changed into a “business,” it just can finally “do business seriously.”

4. Small niche, big space; just starting out, already under pressure

Don't underestimate this "limited to one category" charging.

According to data organized by the on-chain data analysis firm Gate Research on the Dune platform:

• Within two weeks of starting the charges, Polymarket has accumulated approximately 2.19 million dollars in fees;
• At the current pace, weekly revenue is about 730,000 dollars, which can be projected to an annualized figure of 38 million dollars.

This is just for the “15-minute cryptocurrency fluctuations” subcategory. The fields currently covered by Polymarket include:

• U.S. and global political elections
• Top sporting events such as the World Cup, NBA, and LPL
• Macroeconomic events such as Fed meetings and CPI releases
• Long-term topics like cryptocurrency, real estate, and AI technological developments

The profit margin is far from opened up. But the other side of the coin is: Compliance is never a one-time thing.

Obtaining the CFTC’s DCM license only indicates that it passed the federal level “examination.” However, the U.S. is a federal system, and each state has the authority to establish its own financial and gambling regulations. In mid-January 2026, the Tennessee sports gambling regulatory agency issued a cease-and-desist order to Polymarket and similar platform Kalshi, explicitly requiring:

“Immediately cease offering sports event contracts to residents of this state, or face civil penalties and even criminal charges.”

Similar challenges exist globally:

• The Japanese Financial Services Agency (FSA) explicitly lists event contracts as prohibited businesses;
• The UK’s FCA requires licensing, high collateral, and strict anti-money laundering reviews;
• All prediction markets within China are inaccessible and are expressly prohibited by policy.

Therefore, Polymarket's next step is not rampant expansion, but continuous adaptation:

• Establish localized compliant entities in different jurisdictions;
• Differentiate product design boundaries between “financial tools” and “entertainment activities”;
• Explore collaborations with traditional financial institutions to convert probability data into risk control model inputs.

Can it become a “evergreen tree” in the Web3 world? The answer lies not in how advanced the technology is, but whether it can find a sustainable middle path among regulation, users, and business.

The prediction market offers us a rare perspective: when the world is filled with uncertainties, we can at least know - at this moment, how many people around the world are willing to wager real money on “this event will occur.”

This consensus may not be correct, but it is real enough. And Polymarket's recent charging is not the end of the story, but the true beginning of its growth as a real service.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。