Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy

This article

CN
BITWU.ETH
Follow
4 hours ago
AI summarizes in 5 seconds.

This article is worth a thorough study by all DeFi enthusiasts and practitioners!

Just a few days ago, I wrote about Spark @sparkdotfi launching the vault rating, and we can continue to discuss this action in depth—

Let’s return to a long-avoided pain point in DeFi: on-chain, the best at quoting, and the worst at accountability.

APY, TVL, utilization rate, borrowing demand, these indicators are showcased by all protocols, but when it comes to underlying risk disclosure, loss paths, and responsibility division, the vast majority of protocols are unwilling to discuss.

Because they only curate and only need to showcase various assets to attract the liquidity you have in hand; who cares whether these assets are fundamentally safe or not.

So my judgment on Spark @sparkdotfi's introduction of the Credora rating is:

It is not merely creating a more appealing front-end label, but is seizing the rights to explain risks in DeFi.

This move is somewhat akin to early companies obtaining Moody's ratings.

Ratings themselves are certainly not a talisman, but whoever first standardizes risk, and is willing to accept external scrutiny, will find it easier to access that picky, yet hardest to budge, high-quality capital.

This matter cannot be accomplished just by a marketing long article claiming "trust me, it's safe."

Once risk ratings are embedded in the deposit entrance, the competition logic among DeFi vaults will shift from comparing yields to entering the "Low-Risk DeFi" phase, which V God @VitalikButerin has repeatedly mentioned.

If a vault is really to become an on-chain asset manager, then ratings are not just an added bonus but the most basic professional threshold:

Only vaults that incorporate ratings are qualified for faster deposit growth, higher capital retention, and more stable curator credibility!

Spark is currently the beneficiary, but in the future, the entire DeFi sector will face this issue.


免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

抢莫斯科门票,分5万刀!
广告
|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Selected Articles by BITWU.ETH

56 minutes ago
Used @SurfAI to manually create an $BTC bottom-fishing and top-selling board.
5 hours ago
🚨 A not-so-good signal: The mini death cross has appeared in the US stock market.
10 hours ago
After the decline, I found that the last price suggested for the dual-currency financial product offered by the lobster looked very appealing.
View More

Table of Contents

|
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Related Articles

avatar
avatarBITWU.ETH
56 minutes ago
Used @SurfAI to manually create an $BTC bottom-fishing and top-selling board.
avatar
avatarBITWU.ETH
5 hours ago
🚨 A not-so-good signal: The mini death cross has appeared in the US stock market.
avatar
avatarDelphi Digital
7 hours ago
Jason on how he\\\'s positioned for the war\\\"In terms of everything short to medium-term
avatar
avatarDelphi Digital
10 hours ago
Jose makes the case for being hedged right now\\\"I feel like this is an obvious place to be hedged and not take too much risk
APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink