On March 26, 2026, Eastern Eight Time, Futu Holdings’ wholly-owned subsidiary Cheetah Trading (Hong Kong) Limited officially announced that it has obtained a comprehensive virtual asset license in Hong Kong and will begin operations, providing services under the Hong Kong virtual asset regulatory framework. According to public information, this platform has been defined by several media as the first licensed virtual asset trading platform incubated by a brokerage in Hong Kong, indicating that a complete connection has been achieved at the licensing level between traditional internet brokerages and cryptocurrency trading infrastructure, opening up greater possibilities for the market. The main unresolved question surrounding this event is: can traditional brokerages and virtual asset businesses achieve genuine compliance integration and business synergy under Hong Kong's "license + sandbox" regulatory framework, rather than just a simple business platter?

License Implementation: Full Throttle After a Year of Dormancy

Public records show that Cheetah Trading obtained the Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission on January 27, 2025, but it wasn't until March 26, 2026 that the platform officially announced its “full-scale operations,” completing the transition from licensing to actual business operation. During this year-long period, the platform maintained a low profile, with the public almost only seeing the “licensed” regulatory label without any large-scale retail promotion or business volume. Today's official announcement symbolizes a crucial step from “regulatory permission” to “commercial operation.”

In the context of Hong Kong regulation, the market's term “comprehensive virtual asset license” roughly indicates that the platform can provide compliant virtual asset spot trading, custody services, and matching and risk control systems to eligible clients under the oversight of the Securities and Futures Commission. The platform needs to meet relatively strict regulatory requirements in areas such as client asset segregation, cold/hot wallet security, anti-money laundering and KYC, and market manipulation prevention, while also undergoing ongoing inspection. This positioning is in stark contrast to the previously loose offshore model based on “place of registration + exemption clause,” and is more closely aligned with the operational framework of traditional regulated financial institutions.

Compared to the previous state of “licensed but not widely operational,” this high-profile announcement of business initiation is significant in at least two layers: first, from the regulatory perspective, it indicates that another licensed platform operating under a formal regulatory framework is truly entering the operational phase, enriching the compliance virtual asset market landscape that Hong Kong hopes to build; second, from the commercial perspective, Cheetah Trading is no longer just a “potential growth point” in Futu's financial reports and announcements, but must undergo real market testing in terms of customer acquisition, products, risk control, and revenue contribution.

Brokerage Involvement: Why Futu Built its Own Platform

The uniqueness of Cheetah Trading lies in that it is not an independent startup team, but a wholly-owned subsidiary of Futu Holdings, belonging to a typical “brokerage-incubated” virtual asset platform. Futu emphasizes in its official statements the aim to create the first comprehensive service system in Hong Kong operating simultaneously under a licensed brokerage and a virtual asset exchange, using different licensed entities within the same group to cover traditional securities brokerage, asset management, and virtual asset trading, then weaving these into a unified service network through products and technology. This thinking essentially views virtual assets as a new component in the asset spectrum rather than a marginal accessory.

In Hong Kong's retail brokerage market, Futu Securities has long been dedicated to online and mobile investment services, accumulating a significant base of local and cross-border investors. This existing user asset and behavior data offers Cheetah Trading a natural shortcut for customer acquisition, education, and trust endorsement: users are not starting to approach cryptocurrency assets from a “completely unknown platform,” but rather gradually understanding and trying a new asset class under the familiar brokerage brand and interface. Futu's years of accumulated compliance image and technical experience in the securities investment field have been effectively “transplanted” into the virtual asset trading context, lowering the cost of establishing brand recognition and trust for Cheetah in the early stages.

From the traditional brokerage's business perspective, the motivation behind building a compliant virtual asset platform is easy to understand. On one hand, retail and high-net-worth clients' interest in virtual asset allocation has already become a visible market demand; if the broker cannot meet this demand within a compliant framework, funds may naturally flow to third-party platforms, weakening customer stickiness. On the other hand, simply relying on traditional income sources such as securities brokerage and margin trading is greatly affected by macro cycles and regulatory policy fluctuations, so expanding into new trading and custody categories is a way to hedge against the risks of business singularity. In Hong Kong, a market actively promoting virtual asset regulation and innovation, Futu's choice to take on cryptocurrency trading under its own licensed entity rather than simply cooperating with external platforms indicates its intention to hold a more complete infrastructure and voice in the new track.

Smoothing the Pathway: From Securities Accounts to Cryptocurrency Assets

With this announcement of comprehensive operations, Futu has indicated an important direction: Cheetah Trading will soon be fully connected with Futu Securities. While not involving yet undisclosed technical details, this “full connection” at least points towards the integration of account systems, trading portals, and asset views—users may complete identity verification and risk assessment through the existing Futu Securities system and access virtual asset trading functions under the same application or unified portal, achieving a smoother switching experience between “securities accounts and virtual asset accounts.”

From the front-end product experience, Cheetah offers core support for trade matching, asset custody, and technical solutions to Futu Securities, enabling Futu to maintain a consistent interaction logic and brand presentation on the user side. For end investors, the ideal scenario is “frontend imperceptibility, backend division of labor”: users still place orders and view assets in the familiar Futu application, while risk control, custody, blockchain settlement, and other underlying links are completed by Cheetah within a compliance framework, realizing a “tiered backend” in terms of technology and licensing. This model helps reduce friction for users frequently switching between different apps and KYC processes, while also allowing for the regulatory division of responsibilities among entities.

With the experience and path streamlined, the barrier to cross-asset allocation is expected to be significantly reduced. For an ordinary investor who is only familiar with Hong Kong stocks, US stocks, or funds, if they can view a unified asset view of securities and virtual assets, along with changes in returns and risk notifications within the same interface, the psychological cost of transitioning from “bystander” to “trying out a small amount” will be significantly reduced. Though specific product forms, risk control thresholds, and asset display methods have not yet been fully disclosed, the integration of accounts and the shortening of trading paths in itself constitutes a structural incentive for retail investors' behavior, promoting some traditional capital market funds to embrace virtual asset categories more conveniently.

Innovations in the Regulatory Sandbox: The Imagination and Constraints of Unified Purchasing Power

In terms of regulatory innovation, sources such as Planet Daily have mentioned that Cheetah and Futu “plan to study incorporating virtual asset holdings into unified purchasing power calculations”. It is important to emphasize that this is currently still at the conceptual and research stage, representing directional exploration rather than a formal scheme that has already been implemented. The specific implementation path, timeline, and detail parameters have not been publicly disclosed. Nevertheless, this idea still has a strong discussion value, as it directly addresses the efficiency boundary of funds between “securities + virtual assets.”

If unified purchasing power is indeed realized in the future, the fund allocation efficiency between securities and virtual assets for investors may witness a qualitative change: theoretically, the net holdings and risk exposure of investors in virtual assets may be incorporated into the overall asset net value and margin calculation logic, potentially affecting their order capability and leverage space on the securities side. The “static segregation” of funds between different asset categories could shift to “dynamic coordination,” which would help to enhance overall fund utilization and client stickiness. However, this may also introduce new risk points—such as the high volatility of virtual asset prices potentially transmitting more rapidly to the safety margins and mandatory liquidation conditions of securities positions through a unified purchasing power mechanism.

From the perspective of regulatory prudence, such innovations cannot simply be regarded as “product optimization,” but are related to the institutional changes in leverage amplification and risk transmission pathways. The Hong Kong government has recently shown a “support for innovation, bottom-line thinking” attitude towards virtual asset policies: on one hand, it actively introduces licensing systems and encourages institutional compliance for entry; on the other hand, it obviously maintains caution in the pace of leverage, lending, and derivatives openness. Mechanisms like unified purchasing power, if intended to be included in actual business regulations, will inevitably require meticulous design in terms of risk weight, discount factors, maximum leverage ratios, and liquidation logic to prevent the impact of single points in the virtual asset market from amplifying systemic fluctuations in the traditional capital market; this is also a boundary that regulators and institutions must collectively grasp in the context of “sandbox-style innovation.”

Accelerating License Competition: The Restructuring of Hong Kong’s Crypto Finance Landscape

Placing Cheetah Trading’s license acquisition and business initiation into the larger Hong Kong virtual asset regulatory framework reveals that its core difference from previous licensed platforms is the “brokerage background”. Many of the past licensed entities originated from the crypto native sector and then moved closer to compliance; whereas Cheetah has extended from the traditional licensed brokerage system into virtual assets. This indicates that Hong Kong's licensed ecosystem is gradually evolving from a one-way narrative of “crypto institutions extending into finance” to a two-way structure of “traditional finance and crypto natives rushing toward each other,” with the regulatory license itself becoming a bridge for both parties to meet in the middle.

With the addition of brokerage platforms, the participant structure of Hong Kong's virtual asset ecosystem is shifting towards a tripartite competition: one end consists of native trading platforms that are familiar with crypto-origin culture and have faster technological iterations; the other end includes internet brokerages and financial institutions with a large traditional customer base and brand accumulation; the middle comprises comprehensive service platforms that cater to demands from both ends and exhibit more mixed forms. Within this structure, the acquisition of a license itself is merely a ticket to entry, and what truly determines future trading volume and user attention naturally hinges on the comprehensive results of compliance intensity, brand trust, and product experience.

On the compliance front, whoever can offer investors a richer asset selection and risk control tools without breaching regulatory bottom lines has a greater chance of attracting medium-to-long-term institutional funding; on the brand front, traditional brokerages' trust advantage among existing users will form a different layer of “trust barriers” compared to the discourse power of crypto-native platforms in on-chain native scenarios; on the product experience front, account integration, fund transfer efficiency, mobile interaction, and educational content will directly influence retail users' preferences. Even though the outside world expects to see an intense scene of “market share competition,” it remains difficult to quantitatively predict the specific split ratios at this stage; however, it is certain that with more brokerages and traditional financial institutions entering the arena, the “license competition” and service competition within the Hong Kong virtual asset market will only further accelerate.

From Pilot to Model: Future Pathways for Hong Kong-style Brokerage and Crypto Interaction

From Futu's own business perspective, Cheetah Trading's acquisition of a license and the commencement of operations not only fills a critical gap in its integrated layout of “securities brokerage + virtual asset trading” in the Hong Kong market, providing existing clients with a new channel to complete cross-asset allocations within the same group framework; it also positions Futu advantageously in the new round of competitive race for compliant virtual asset infrastructure, retaining imaginative space for future directions such as custody and technology output. Regarding Hong Kong's overall virtual asset regulatory practice, the Cheetah case provides an observable real-world sample of “how traditional internet brokerages can introduce virtual asset businesses under a local licensing system.”

Looking ahead, as more brokerages and traditional financial institutions may follow Futu's example to apply for or incubate their own virtual asset platforms, the competitive landscape of the Hong Kong market is expected to shift from “dominated by a few licensed platforms” to “dislocated competition among multiple entities”: native crypto platforms may maintain an advantage in deep products and on-chain scenarios; while brokerage and banking institutions compete for mindshare in compliance, customer base, and comprehensive financial planning scenarios. Ultimately, what emerges is likely to be a multi-layered, multi-entry virtual asset service system, rather than a single “winner takes all” pattern.

The real determining factors for how far this “brokerage + virtual assets” pathway can go remain several key uncertainties: first, the regulatory control over the rhythm of innovation—whether institutional innovations, such as unified purchasing power, derivatives opening, and cross-border capital flow, will be implemented at a broad range and swift pace; second, the effectiveness of investor education—whether traditional investors can truly understand the risk-return characteristics of virtual assets and develop sustainable allocation behaviors within the compliance framework; third, whether concepts like “unified purchasing power” can genuinely materialize under controllable risks instead of remaining in the realm of market imagination. The comprehensive business operation of Cheetah Trading signifies that this new track has entered the “practical stage,” and the real test has just begun.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。