Why does traditional finance continue to accumulate Ethereum despite the constant decline in coin prices?

CN
AiCoin
Follow
3 hours ago

The cryptocurrency market in 2026 is harsh and cold. Previously highly anticipated Ethereum is hovering around $1900, with an annual drop of more than 36%, and the psychological barrier of $3000 seems out of reach. Retail investor sentiment is low, and social media is filled with complaints about "over-leveraged" and "narrative failure." However, beneath this seemingly bleak surface, a quiet yet directionally clear "asset migration" is unfolding.

Traditional financial institutions are not fleeing; instead, they are doubling down.

From JPMorgan deploying a money market fund directly on Ethereum, to BlackRock launching the tokenized fund BUIDL, to the passage of the U.S. "GENIUS Stablecoin Act" paving the way for compliance. While market speculators exit due to stagnant coin prices, genuine "big money" is utilizing this rare window period to acquire land in the Ethereum ecosystem.

This article will focus on March 2026 as a time point to deeply analyze the core logic behind this phenomenon: why, despite disappointing price performance, does traditional finance still choose to heavily invest in Ethereum?

1. Institutions Are Not "Speculating on Coins," But "Building Infrastructure"

 To understand the logic of institutions, one must first discard the mindset of retail investors. For financial giants like JPMorgan, Fidelity, and Deutsche Bank, Ethereum's price volatility is not their primary concern. They value Ethereum's irreplaceability as a global settlement layer.

 According to the latest data, Ethereum's mainnet accounts for as much as 57% of the total locked value (TVL), and if Layer 2 solutions like Base and Arbitrum are included, this number skyrockets to an astonishing 65%. In comparison, the formidable competitor Solana has a TVL of only $6.4 billion.

 This is the primary reason institutions choose Ethereum: liquidity depth and network effects.

In the financial world, capital always flows to the hottest and safest places. By 2026, the "experimental phase" of asset tokenization has officially ended, and the industry has entered a phase of large-scale deployment. The following cases that occurred in early 2026 are enough to illustrate the point:

 JPMorgan: Deployed a money market fund directly on Ethereum's mainnet, becoming one of the first mainstream banks to adopt public blockchain directly.

 BlackRock: As the pioneer of "everything tokenized," its BUIDL fund launched on Ethereum has become an industry benchmark.

 BNY Mellon: Tokenized AAA-rated collateralized loan obligation (CLO) funds on the Ethereum platform.

These institutions are not "speculating on coins"; they are building the infrastructure for future digital finance on Ethereum. For them, ETH is not just a tradable asset, but the necessary "digital oil" to run these on-chain applications.

2. The "Matthew Effect" of the Ecosystem: 65% of Locked Value and Anti-Fragility

 Despite a decline in DEX trading volume, the Ethereum ecosystem has demonstrated extreme anti-fragility. In February 2026, the trading volume on Ethereum DEXs fell to $56.5 billion, down from its peak, but Solana's volume also dropped to $95.5 billion in the same period. Comparing trading volumes alone can be misleading, as a significant portion of value exchange within Ethereum occurs at deeper Layer 2 and institutional-level settlements.

 More importantly, the race of real-world assets (RWA) is exploding. Currently, Ethereum holds a market share of as high as 68% in the RWA field. This means that when traditional assets (such as government bonds, stocks, and private credit) want to "go on-chain," Ethereum and its EVM-compatible environment is the default option for developers.

 Even pioneering public chains like Hyperliquid performing well in derivatives trading only have a TVL of $1.5 billion, which is still not on the same magnitude compared to Ethereum's hundreds of billions.

3. Vitalik's "Technical Correction": From Relying on Rollup to Bottom Layer Reconstruction

 In response to market criticisms that "Ethereum only makes empty promises," co-founder Vitalik Buterin provided a clear technical roadmap at the beginning of 2026. This time, his direction is not to continue promoting Layer 2 but rather to return to the fundamentals and reconstruct the execution layer.

 In addressing the previously criticized issues of "subsidizing Rollup and stagnating mainnet performance," Vitalik proposed a series of measures:

1. Parallel Processing: By introducing features like "block access lists," the serial transaction verification model is changed, allowing validators to check multiple transactions in parallel, significantly improving mainnet processing efficiency.

2. Gas Fee Repricing: A "multi-dimensional Gas" mechanism is planned, imposing higher fees for creating new states (such as deploying new contracts), thereby curbing state explosion and lowering transaction costs for ordinary users.

3. Phased Implementation of ZK-EVM: This is a long-term vision. Future Ethereum nodes will no longer need to re-execute all transactions to validate blocks; they will only need to validate a zero-knowledge proof. Vitalik plans to pilot this with some nodes in 2026, with the ultimate goal of having all nodes rely on ZK-EVM proof to achieve exponential improvements in execution efficiency.

 These technical deep dives are precisely what traditional financial institutions value most: "certainty." What they need is not a fast chain driven by MEME, but a secure environment with a clear iterative path capable of supporting trillion-dollar assets.

4. The New Narrative of AI: ERC-8004 and "Digital Identity for AI Agents"

Besides financial properties, Ethereum is quietly laying out the next trillion-dollar race: artificial intelligence.

 Davide Crapis, head of AI at the Ethereum Foundation, made it clear that Ethereum's goal is not to compete with AI on computational levels, but to become the coordination and verification layer for the AI world. As more economic activities are autonomously executed by AI agents, how can malicious actions be prevented? How can two unfamiliar AI agents establish trust?

 Ethereum provides the answer with the ERC-8004 standard, also known as the "on-chain identity for AI agents." This standard creates verifiable behavioral records of AI agents on-chain through the registries of identity, reputation, and verification.

 Although the AI agent field is currently dominated by Solana and Base, Ethereum is betting on the future: when AI agents truly begin to handle high-value assets, merely relying on speed and low costs will not suffice; a decentralized trust layer is essential. At that time, Ethereum's existing security and institutional recognition will become its deepest moat.

5. The Favor of Regulation: From Gray Areas to Compliance Mainstream

 In 2025, the passage of the U.S. "GENIUS Stablecoin Act" was a milestone event. It not only established a regulatory framework for stablecoins but also illuminated a "green light" for public blockchain infrastructure like Ethereum.

 Driven by the new leadership of the SEC, the United States is establishing its first regulatory system to support innovation since 2015. As SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated, "In the next two years, all markets in the United States will achieve on-chain operations."

 For traditional financial institutions, the clarification of regulations means reduced risks. Today, 60% of stablecoins are deployed on Ethereum and its Layer 2 networks. Banks no longer need to worry about innovating in illegal environments; SoFi Bank even became the first bank to issue stablecoins on a permissionless public chain, ultimately choosing the Ethereum platform.

6. Conclusion: A Broader Perspective is Necessary

 Returning to the initial question: why do traditional financial institutions continue to bet on ETH? Because they are not betting on the myth of sudden wealth in the next bull market, but on the underlying protocol for the future global financial infrastructure.

 The decline in coin prices is a disaster for speculators, but an opportunity for builders and allocators. The BTC holding model of MicroStrategy is being replicated for ETH. Crypto treasury companies like BitMine continue to increase their holdings, even staking 68% of their positions, locking in liquidity.

 Although risks such as tightening macro liquidity and competition chain diversion still exist in the short term, Ethereum has built a broad moat with its 65% TVL share, 68% RWA share, clear technical roadmap, and favorable regulatory winds.

 For true long-termists, when the big ship of Wall Street is turning around, the ripples on the surface of the sea are never worth panicking about.

 

Join our community, let's discuss and get stronger together!

Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink