On February 9, 2026, Bernstein reiterated its $150,000 target price for Bitcoin in its latest research report, with a time anchor set around 2026. This stark bullish expectation contrasts sharply with the current price pullback and the prevailing negative sentiment. At the same time, Binance announced the launch of the ESP token presale, scheduled for February 10, 2026, from 20:00 to 22:00 (UTC+8); on-chain, a significant transfer of 7.5553 million TRX, approximately $2.0956 million (data source: Arkham) added more fuel to the already sensitive market. The report's mention of a "crisis of confidence rather than systemic damage" and the social media narrative of the "weakest bear market" intertwine, leading to the real question: is this pullback labeled as the "weakest bear market" merely a misalignment of sentiment, or is it a difficult handover of chips before the next peak?
Behind the Weakest Bear Market Narrative: Price Pullback and Sentiment Misalignment
● Source of Bear Market Sentiment: In recent weeks, Bitcoin's price has continuously retreated from its highs, with daily candles repeatedly breaking key support levels, creating a typical visual of "stacked bearish candles and weak rebounds." The social media chorus of "the top has passed" and "reduce positions to avoid risk" has intensified, leading to hesitance in spot buying and frequent liquidations of long positions in contracts, collectively creating a strong "bear market visual."
● Bernstein's Judgment: In the report dated February 9, Bernstein emphasized that this pullback "reflects a crisis of confidence in the market, rather than systemic damage," aiming to distinguish between price volatility and underlying structural risks. This suggests that, in their view, the current selling pressure in the market is more self-reinforcing in expectation rather than a passive deleveraging triggered by bad debts or platform defaults, as seen in historical deep bear markets.
● Liquidity and Credit Structure: From both macro and on-chain perspectives, there is currently no public evidence of complete liquidity exhaustion or widespread structural bad debts. Mainstream assets centered around Bitcoin still maintain basic trading depth and market-making capabilities, and large-scale "run on the bank" withdrawals are uncommon, with more structural turnover and profit-taking occurring, which is fundamentally different from the chain reactions triggered by credit collapses in past deep bear phases.
● Comparison with Deep Bear Periods: Looking back at previous deep bear phases, Bitcoin often experienced extreme volume sell-offs, continuous downward spirals, and panic exits from on-chain holders. Although this round has seen volume declines, the peaks in trading volume have been relatively mild, and the extremity of panic indices and social discourse is lower than in the "despair zone." This lends credence to the notion of the "weakest bear market"—prices are indeed pulling back, but the market seems more like a repricing of confidence within a high range rather than a systemic collapse.
$150,000 Target Price: The Timeline of Institutional Bets
● ETF Ecosystem Time Window: Bernstein identifies "the improvement of Bitcoin ETF infrastructure" as a crucial support for betting on the $150,000 target, believing that the time window leading up to 2026 will see the gradual maturation of custody, market-making, compliance purchasing, and asset allocation rules. This ecosystem enhancement is not instantaneous but rather a slow integration of BTC into mainstream asset allocation baskets through product line expansion and institutional risk control model adaptation.
● Pathways for Institutional Capital Entry: Under the narrative of "increased participation from institutional investors," the capital pathway often follows a gradual process from small-scale testing to strategic allocation. Family offices and hedge funds initially allocate through ETFs or custody accounts, followed by some traditional asset management and pension funds increasing their weight within compliance frameworks, forming a re-pricing chain from the periphery to the core of assets, which is precisely the structural source of funds that Bernstein bets on.
● Liquidity Environment and Valuation Elasticity: Bernstein views "improved liquidity environment" as a source of valuation elasticity for high target prices—under scenarios of warming global risk appetite and declining expectations for risk-free interest rates, assets with scarcity and high beta characteristics often enjoy valuation premiums. Once the ETF channels are open, Bitcoin is more likely to become a vehicle for macro trading, thereby amplifying volatility while providing a potential liquidity foundation for the $150,000 price range.
● Psychological Anchor or Divergence Amplifier: For market participants, $150,000 could serve as a "long-term confidence anchor," helping some funds hold through the pullback, while others may view it as an "overly optimistic narrative," exacerbating long-short divergences. When prices are far from this range, high target prices often lead to the formation of two factions in the market—one trading time for space, while the other chooses to short in line with the trend, with the core of the game being whose timeline is longer.
7.555 Million TRX Anomaly: An Emotional Projection of a Transfer
● Objective Facts and Data Sources: Around February 9, the on-chain monitoring platform Arkham captured a transfer of 7.5553 million TRX, equivalent to about $2.0956 million at the time. This fund moved from one address to another, and the amount was quite noticeable in that day's public chain transfers, quickly shared by bots and market monitoring accounts, sparking speculation and interest.
● Emotional Amplification Effect: In the current "weakest bear market" atmosphere, such large transfers are easily interpreted as signals of "institutional reallocation" or "capital inflows and outflows," even if the facts remain unclear. For sensitive market sentiment, any on-chain action labeled as "whale" or "institution" can be amplified into a potential trend reversal, influencing short-term traders' follow-up actions and contract layouts.
● Clear Information Boundaries: It is important to emphasize that the specific background and purpose of this TRX transfer have no publicly confirmed information, and the research brief clearly warns against speculating on the identity and motives of the parties involved. Rational investors should delineate the boundary between "objective data at the factual level" and "subjective interpretations at the narrative level," avoiding the linear extrapolation of a single on-chain event into a deterministic investment logic.
● On-Chain Stories as Bear Market Amplifiers: During bearish sentiment phases, self-media and traders often tend to seek "stories" from large on-chain transfers, whether it's "whales bottoming out," "project teams running away," or "institutions withdrawing," all of which can quickly ferment on social platforms. These narratives often lack sufficient evidence but can sway retail expectations in a short time, becoming self-fulfilling catalysts for price fluctuations.
Binance Bets on ESP: New Product Rhythm Amid Bearish Sentiment
● Presale Window and Rhythm: According to official information, Binance will open the ESP token subscription from 20:00 to 22:00 (UTC+8) on February 10, 2026, completing the first round of presale within a two-hour concentrated window. Choosing to launch a new project while the market pullback has not yet stabilized demonstrates the exchange's confidence in its own traffic and users' risk tolerance, and it is a response to the weak market through product rhythm.
● Alpha Points and User Segmentation: In conjunction with the existing Binance Alpha Points system, the exchange implements refined user segmentation and locking through point thresholds, quota allocation, and activity rewards in the new token issuance. On one hand, highly active users who actively participate in the Alpha system gain more exposure to new tokens; on the other hand, this "points + new tokens" combination strengthens platform stickiness, allowing the exchange to attract or soothe specific groups through resource allocation in different market conditions.
● Emotional Effects of Presale During Pullback: Launching the ESP presale during a price pullback presents both risks and opportunities for existing users. On one hand, the new token narrative is expected to temporarily boost trading activity and discussion, alleviating bearish sentiment; on the other hand, during an overall decline in risk appetite, investors may increase their stakes in new projects under the shadow of spot losses, potentially amplifying individual account volatility and creating a complex psychological structure of "old positions trapped + new positions speculating."
● Discrepancy Between Exchange Rhythm and Institutional Bullishness: While institutions like Bernstein construct a long-term bullish narrative with a $150,000 target for 2026, Binance continues the short-term narrative cycle within the platform through new products like ESP, creating a misalignment in the time dimension. Institutions focus more on multi-year asset allocation returns, while exchanges maintain ecological activity through products, points, and activities at every market stage, deepening the market's confusion over "which timeline to follow."
Institutional Bullishness vs. Retail Panic: The Collision of Two Time Systems
● Differences in Time Anchors: Bernstein's report uses 2026 as the main time anchor, viewing Bitcoin as a cross-year asset allocation target, while many retail investors still make decisions based on intraday profits and weekly net value fluctuations. The same pullback may be seen as merely a "noise segment" in a long-term trend from the institutional perspective, while from the retail perspective, it represents the real pressure of "account drawdown" and "liquidation risk," leading to a natural conflict between the two time systems.
● Dual Tracks of Data and Sentiment: On one side, there is a continuous spread of liquidation, loss screenshots, and pessimistic jokes on social media, combined with the amplifying effect of contract liquidation data, reinforcing the collective memory of "longs being harvested"; on the other side, there are phenomena of ETF subscription data stabilizing and some long-term on-chain holders slightly increasing their holdings. The result is a clear dual track between surface discourse and underlying capital behavior: the cries of despair grow louder, but genuine long-term selling has not become mainstream.
● The Double-Edged Nature of the "Weakest Bear Market" Concept: Defining the current phase as the "weakest bear market" serves as a psychological buffer for some funds: prices are pulling back within a high range, but have not yet replayed the brutal depths of historical bear markets, which helps maintain the belief of "holding on." However, for skeptics, this label may be seen as rhetoric, perceived as a reason to continue buying, thus generating stronger distrust towards institutional and leading platform viewpoints.
● Who Pays for Volatility: During this period, whether it is the high-leverage longs forced to liquidate or the long-term participants who increase their positions but face short-term losses, ultimately, they all have to bear the costs of price and sentiment fluctuations. Institutions can smooth out volatility over a longer time dimension, while retail investors, with limited capital and risk tolerance, often become the main payers in short-cycle games, which is also the most concentrated reality of current market contradictions.
From the Weakest Bear Market to the Next Peak: How to Position Yourself Amid Noise
The institutional $150,000 target price and the exchange's rhythm around new products like ESP together weave a narrative framework for medium to long-term bullishness: on one hand, the Bitcoin ETF ecosystem and increased institutional participation provide potential upward space for prices; on the other hand, exchanges continuously activate existing and incremental funds through point systems and new project issuances in different market conditions, maintaining market operations. However, it is important to remind that the large TRX transfer is merely objective on-chain data, and the technical and economic model information of the ESP project remains lacking; investors should not make simple linear bets based on these fragmented pieces of information.
Moving forward, several dimensions worth closely observing include: first, the scale and sustainability of new capital inflows through ETF channels to test the speed of realization of the institutional bullish narrative; second, the actual performance and user participation of new exchange projects like ESP, which will reflect the true recovery level of market risk appetite; third, during price fluctuations, whether the rhythm of sentiment recovery forms positive feedback with on-chain and off-chain capital behaviors. If the timelines set by institutions like Bernstein are ultimately validated by facts, then the current pullback labeled as the "weakest bear market" may resemble a window for chip redistribution within a high range. But the premise remains unchanged: no matter how compelling the story, risk management is always the top priority; clear position control and time expectations are the only consensus to navigate through the noise.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
