On February 5, 2026, Gemini announced it would cease operations in the UK, European Economic Area, and Australia, hitting the brakes hard for a trading platform that had once touted a global narrative. According to the announcement, relevant accounts will be fully shut down on April 6, 2026, and the platform has entered an "asset withdrawal period" for existing users: from March 5, only withdrawal functions will be retained, after which registration will be closed, incentive programs halted, and account permissions continuously tightened. On the same day, the crypto market experienced a sharp correction, with BTC dropping 6.9% in a single day, falling below $70,000, and ZEC plummeting 16.99%. Additionally, a large transfer of 55,483 ETH (approximately $115 million) occurred on-chain, with the contraction decision under regulatory shadows resonating with the fragile market sentiment, compressed into the same time frame, creating a high-volatility panic scenario.
From Expansion to Retreat: The Sudden Stop of Gemini's European Story
● Operational Review and Rhythm Reversal: Gemini once viewed the UK as an important springboard to becoming a global financial center, promoting compliance frameworks, seeking licenses, and establishing local operations. However, according to reports, the platform terminated its UK operations in 2025, which was then interpreted more as a single market adjustment. Now, in 2026, it has announced a simultaneous contraction from the UK, European Economic Area, and Australia, transforming the narrative from "localized optimization" to a clear regional retreat rhythm, with the investments made over the past few years being revalued all at once.
● Key Node of Collective Exit from Three Major Regions: From the timeline perspective, Gemini's actions exhibit the typical characteristics of "phased withdrawal": first, it stopped new account registrations and shut down various incentive programs, cutting off new funding and traffic entry; then it set March 5, 2026 as a critical point, switching relevant accounts to withdrawal-only mode, limiting trading and other product usage; finally, on April 6, it will complete the total shutdown, meaning all functions will cease, and account relationships will be substantively dissolved, leaving users and the market with a very limited disposal window.
● The Contrast Between Globalization Narrative and European Exit: In its early days, Gemini identified itself with "compliance first + global expansion," continuously emphasizing its vision of entering multiple jurisdictions and serving international users. However, after terminating operations in the UK, it has now made a concentrated retreat decision from the European Economic Area and Australia, showing a significant strategic turnaround. This shift from proactive offense to continuous defense reflects not only a contraction of geographical territory but also a deep reassessment of its regulatory environment, profit expectations, and resource allocation.
Regulatory High Walls Rise: Why These Three Territories
● Compliance Costs and Stricter Regulations: Over the past two years, the regulatory framework in the UK and European Economic Area for crypto has tightened continuously, raising thresholds from marketing rules, product classifications to capital and custody requirements. For platforms with limited scale and revenue focus on certain markets, the marginal costs of multi-jurisdiction compliance have risen rapidly. Given that operations in the UK ended in 2025, this simultaneous contraction from the European Economic Area and Australia is likely a result of recalculating the "regulatory return ratio."
● Symbolic Significance of the Largest Scale Retreat: According to Planet Daily, this is "Gemini's most significant regional retreat since the termination of UK operations in 2025." This characterization amplifies the market's imagination regarding the regulatory and survival game—it's not just a single license or product being halted, but a systematic exit from an entire regional business, indicating that the platform has made a very conservative choice between costs, risks, and returns, allowing outsiders to more clearly feel the actual pressure exerted by regulatory high walls on mid-tier platforms' business landscapes.
● Information Gaps and Interpretative Boundaries: It should be emphasized that the platform has not publicly detailed the specific sources of regulatory pressure it faces in these markets. Research briefs also indicate that technical details such as whether the European Economic Area and Australia will execute synchronously remain to be verified. The specific rules and execution processes for withdrawal modes in various regions have not been disclosed, and in the absence of official information, excessive interpretation of regulatory terms, enforcement processes, and even "behind-the-scenes games" is more emotional projection than fact, necessitating cautious space.
Countdown to Withdrawals: A Large Migration of Existing User Assets
● Transition Window from March 5 to April 6: According to the announcement timeline, starting from March 5, 2026, accounts in the UK, European Economic Area, and Australia will enter withdrawal-only mode, where users can no longer trade, redeem, or participate in incentives, but can only choose to withdraw assets or liquidate positions. Until the platform is completely shut down on April 6, this roughly one-month window becomes a "dispersal period" for existing funds: users must assess the monetization risks brought by price fluctuations while finding a balance between on-chain congestion and cross-platform transfer friction, as any delay could amplify execution difficulties in the final stages.
● Chain Reaction of Concentrated Withdrawals and Cross-Platform Migration: Market analysis points out that the "withdrawal mode transition period may trigger concentrated migration of user assets." If a large number of users transfer their assets from Gemini to self-custody wallets or other trading platforms in a short time, there will be a significant on-chain migration trajectory, and the transfer fees and congestion of related public chains may also be temporarily amplified. At the same time, the redistribution of funds across exchanges will alter the liquidity structure and arbitrage patterns between certain platforms, resulting in a passive migration and repricing process for those trading pairs and products that already rely on Gemini's traffic.
● Restructuring Relationships with High Net Worth Individuals and Institutions: In the context of the termination of incentive programs and no new accounts being opened, high net worth users and institutional funds that rely on Gemini for trading and custody will be forced to reassess their global layout. For these entities, it is not just a simple matter of "moving assets out," but a comprehensive evaluation of multi-jurisdictional regulatory risks, platform financial stability, and regional service capabilities, potentially reallocating more weight to stronger capital players with more licenses in Europe and the UK. This behavioral change will often gradually manifest as a restructuring of the long-term customer base after the transition period.
Market Chain Reactions: BTC Plummets and Whales Escape in Resonance
● Market Slice on Panic Day: On February 5, the day Gemini announced its retreat from three regions, the crypto market simultaneously experienced a sharp correction. According to data from Jinse Finance, BTC dropped 6.9% in a single day, falling below the $70,000 mark, while ZEC plummeted 16.99%, with multiple assets declining together creating a strong sense of panic. In the context of the regulatory narrative, platform contraction, and price crash, the market's panic over the "compliance risk—platform risk—asset price" triple chain was rapidly amplified, leading to a massive sell-off.
● The Possibility Behind the Large Transfer of 55,483 ETH: On-chain data service Lookonchain revealed that on that day, a certain wallet withdrew 55,483 ETH in one go, amounting to approximately $115 million at the time. This scale clearly exceeds ordinary user behavior, and the market generally associates it with institutional rebalancing or large fund reallocations. In light of the Gemini incident, some believe that certain institutions may be taking the opportunity to reduce their exposure in specific platforms and regions, and it cannot be ruled out that it is a periodic rebalancing operation independent of Gemini—without confirmation of wallet ownership, the most prudent interpretation is that large funds are sensitively responding to the risk environment of the day, resonating with the platform's contraction narrative in timing, but cannot be simply equated.
● Incentives, Amplifiers, or a Piece of the Cyclical Puzzle: From a temporal perspective, Gemini's announcement and the overall market correction overlap significantly, making it easy to interpret as a "direct trigger." However, looking at the broader context, this round of market activity has already accumulated a large amount of unrealized gains, with leverage and sentiment indicators in a relatively overheated range. In this context, any negative news—especially related to regulation and platform security—has the potential to act as a downward trigger or amplifier. A more reasonable understanding is that Gemini's retreat from three regions provides a narrative anchor for the existing correction pressure, serving as a piece of a larger cyclical adjustment picture rather than the entire answer.
The Control Group Emerges: Others Double Down in Europe While Gemini Chooses to Retreat
● A Sharp Contrast with Platforms like Coinbase: Just as Gemini announced its contraction from the UK, European Economic Area, and Australia, other leading platforms were ramping up their presence in the same regulatory environment. Exchanges represented by Coinbase have continuously pushed for compliance licensing and product localization in Europe and the UK over the past two years, viewing strict regulation as an opportunity window to build a moat. One platform is retreating from the same region, while another is continuously applying for licenses and expanding service scope, forming a starkly contrasting "divergent strategic curve."
● The Underlying Logic of Different Choices Under the Same Regulation: Facing the same regulatory high walls, platforms make different choices based on differences in capital strength, business focus, and profit expectations. For well-capitalized leading platforms aiming for a globally multipolar layout, they are more willing to bear high compliance costs in the short term to exchange for future market share and brand premium in mature jurisdictions like Europe; whereas platforms like Gemini, with limited influence in certain regions, are more likely to prioritize preserving core markets, concentrating resources on areas with more certain returns and clearer regulatory paths, thus sacrificing the long-term option value in certain regions.
● The Redistribution Effect of Users and Liquidity: The direct result of Gemini's exit is that local users and liquidity are forced to seek new counterparts. In Europe and the UK, local funds are more likely to turn to platforms that have obtained licenses or are actively compliant, objectively enhancing these platforms' bargaining power and pricing power in the local market. For certain trading varieties, market-making institutions, and arbitrage funds that heavily rely on Gemini, they must reconstruct their cross-platform networks. This "passive redistribution" will not only change the order book structure and price difference patterns but will also shape the concentration and competitive landscape of regional markets over a longer period.
An Unfinished Exit Show: The Next Act for Gemini
After terminating operations in the UK, Gemini has chosen to collectively withdraw from the UK, European Economic Area, and Australia, confirming its strategic turning point in the relevant European markets. The narrative originally centered around "compliance going global" has been rewritten to "actively contracting the front line under regulatory pressure and cost constraints," with the platform's risk appetite and resource allocation logic visibly changing.
In the medium to long term, the landscape of crypto exchanges is likely to become more regionalized and multipolar: a few players with strong capital buffers, robust compliance teams, and clear governance structures will seize the high ground in regulatory-friendly or well-institutionalized markets; while mid-tier platforms that cannot bear the compliance costs across multiple jurisdictions will have to focus deeply on a few core areas or shift to lighter asset and more segmented business models. Compliance capability and capital buffer will evolve from being "bonus items" to hard thresholds for platform survival.
This exit show is far from over. Moving forward, how Gemini reconstructs its positioning in the Americas and other relatively friendly jurisdictions—whether to continue emphasizing compliance license advantages or return more to niche markets and specific customer groups—will directly impact its trust relationship with institutional funds. At the same time, regulators and large institutions will reassess Gemini's stability and long-term commitment in light of this retreat, determining how to "reprice" it. In the larger industry narrative, Gemini is just one case, but it is enough to prompt all market participants to reconsider a question: as regulatory high walls continue to rise, who can still run far and stand firm on the global chessboard?
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
