In the Eastern Eight Time Zone this week, the anonymous whale address 0xFB7…e0A3 has once again taken action, increasing its holdings by 20,000 ETH through the market maker Wintermute, amounting to approximately $56.13 million based on the transaction range. This brings the total accumulated purchases since January 21 to 70,013 ETH. With this coherent operation, the overall average cost of this address is about $2907.69, and the latest batch of chips was bought in the range of $2806–$2806.58. Coupled with its historical cumulative profit of $98.18 million, this round of increased holdings has currently recorded about $2.1 million in unrealized gains. As the spot price of ETH rebounds from a low point and cross-chain funds accelerate switching between Ethereum and other public chains like Solana, this whale continues to stockpile, raising questions about whether there is a noteworthy flow of funds and risk preference resonance worth tracking in relation to the extreme yield pools in on-chain DeFi and the explosive growth of new coins on Solana, which has become a market focus.
70,000 Chips in Play: Whale's Cost, Safety Margin, and Rhythm
● Building Rhythm: Since January 21, 0xFB7…e0A3 has accumulated 70,013 ETH through multiple large buy orders, with the latest round consisting of a single increase of 20,000 ETH, accounting for nearly one-third of the overall position, clearly marking the highest intensity of betting in this phase. This "initial batch + mid-stage heavy hammer" rhythm reflects its strategy of significantly increasing the chip ratio only during price corrections and ample liquidity.
● Cost and Safety Margin: On-chain statistics show that the average building cost since January 21 is about $2907.69, while the latest purchase price for the 20,000 ETH is concentrated in the $2806–$2806.58 range, which is over a hundred dollars lower than the overall cost. With the current spot price slightly above this range, the entire position has formed a certain cushion of unrealized gains, and the new batch of chips has a higher safety margin, allowing for more maneuvering space in subsequent fluctuations and reducing overall drawdown pressure.
● Profit Profile and Aggressiveness: This whale's past trading has accumulated profits of about $98.18 million, and after this round of increased holdings, the current unrealized gains are about $2.1 million, which is still in the very early "preparatory phase" compared to historical performance. From the perspective of position size and cost control, this building seems more like a steady increase of chips near the center rather than an aggressive high-buying approach, maintaining the certainty of a continued profit curve while reserving ample flexibility for whether to continue increasing positions later.
The Secret Channel via Wintermute and Market Impact
● Motivation for Using Market Maker Channels: Choosing to execute large orders of 20,000 ETH through professional market makers like Wintermute is a common path for large funds, primarily due to reasons such as: utilizing the market maker's quotes and inventory across multiple platforms to reduce slippage and avoid directly crashing the public order book; leveraging over-the-counter or internal matching channels to some extent to obscure the order rhythm and price details; and obtaining deeper liquidity and customized execution plans. It is important to emphasize that on-chain, we can only see funds flowing from the whale address to Wintermute-related addresses, and we do not know the specific instruction design and internal execution details.
● Transmission to the Market and Volatility: Such large purchases through market making or over-the-counter channels often do not leave "straight-line pull-up" traces on a single exchange's spot market, but when market makers hedge risks, they may still gradually accumulate on multiple centralized and decentralized platforms, indirectly pushing up buying demand. For trading pairs with generally low liquidity and thin order books, this continuous hedging will significantly elevate the depth of buy orders and compress the selling price space in a short time, thereby amplifying short-term volatility under favorable news.
● Boundaries of Facts and Attribution Restraint: Currently, what can be confirmed is only the scale of funds, average purchase price, and the on-chain flow from the whale to the market maker. There is insufficient evidence to support how much this single whale has driven the rebound in ETH prices or whether it has dominated the market direction during specific time periods. A more reasonable view is to see it as an important clue that "large funds with a winning record are increasing their spot holdings," rather than simply attributing all recent price increases to a single point.
Retail Investors Chasing DeFi: Funds Flowing in the Illusion of Returns
● Extreme APR Emotional Sample: On-chain monitoring shows that a certain DeFi pool PENGUIN-USDC has an APR as high as 4986%, which is eye-catching and reflects the current frenzy for high-yield DeFi products. However, it should be clarified that this is just a single extreme case and does not represent the average yield level or sustainable returns of the broader market, serving only as a barometer of the significantly "heightened" risk preference of retail and small funds.
● Fund Circulation Behind High Returns: Such four-digit APRs often rely on short-term liquidity games and high-intensity token incentives. In the early stages of fund inflow, early participants amplify their returns through transaction fee sharing and high token emissions, but once new fund inflows slow down, incentives are halved, or prices retract, annualized returns can collapse instantly. This structure easily creates an "outflow effect" on mainstream coin spot allocations, with some funds being lured away from leading assets like ETH to speculate on high-volatility, high-decline liquidity pools.
● Divergence in Risk Preferences Between Whales and Retail Investors: In contrast to retail investors chasing short-cycle games like the 4986% APR, 0xFB7…e0A3 has clearly chosen the path of low-leverage heavy holdings in spot ETH, which is closer to a "time-for-space" medium to long-term layout. The former relies on frequent rotations and quick in-and-out strategies to seek excess returns, with a very low margin for error; the latter, while controlling entry costs, bets on the long-term performance of mainstream assets, reflecting a structural divergence in risk tolerance and cycle patience due to differences in fund scale.
Surge in Solana Tokens: Speculative Frenzy and Mainstream Chips Contrast
● New Issuance Peak in Five Months: During the same period, the Solana ecosystem saw over 52,000 new tokens issued within 24 hours, reaching a peak not seen in nearly five months. This dense rhythm of new token creation is almost a typical signal of rising on-chain speculation. The emergence of a large number of low-market-cap new coins often indicates a dramatic increase in minting and short-term trading activities, with speculators attempting to complete chip distribution and price elevation within a very short time window.
● Short-Term Siphoning Effect on Funds: The small-cap new coins and meme frenzy on Solana have a significant siphoning effect on active funds in the market. Some positions that might have been allocated to ETH, BTC, or blue-chip protocol tokens are being redirected towards speculative targets with higher multiples, creating a short-term misalignment in the transaction growth of mainstream assets and the activity of newly added on-chain addresses. During a phase of extremely heightened risk preference, this "mutual exclusion" is more pronounced, and once expectations collapse, funds may quickly flow back to large-cap assets.
● Quick In-and-Out vs. Long-Term Bets Structural Division: In contrast, high-frequency new coin speculation on Solana and whale spot accumulation on ETH are almost at opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of time dimension and risk structure. The former is an extreme utilization of "quick in-and-out," characterized by very short project lifecycles and rapid narrative changes; the latter is akin to increasing "long-term bets" on the leading asset ETH, placing greater emphasis on technology and ecosystem positioning in future cycles. This division also reflects the different roles that funds play within the market: some act as liquidity and sentiment amplifiers, while others quietly accumulate mainstream chips behind the scenes.
Aligning with the BTC National Team: Long-Term Buyers are Converging
● El Salvador's Accumulation Trajectory: Beyond individual whales, the government of El Salvador has recently continued to announce its BTC buying progress: adding 8 BTC in the past 7 days and a total of 31 BTC in the last 30 days, slowly but steadily positioning BTC as a long-term asset on the national balance sheet. The existence of this "national-level long-term buyer" provides the market with a reference curve of demand that is completely different from trading funds.
● Rhythm Differences and Commonalities: Compared to El Salvador's "dollar-cost averaging" accumulation rhythm for BTC, 0xFB7…e0A3 has adopted a more trading-oriented concentrated accumulation strategy for ETH, with the two differing significantly in operational aspects: one emphasizes long-term faith and political symbolism, while the other stresses historical win rates and capital efficiency. However, their commonality lies in the fact that both are continuously increasing their stakes in leading crypto assets with real money and both have a relatively higher tolerance for short-term price pullbacks.
● Insights from a Configuration Perspective: When sovereign funds and high-win-rate whale funds simultaneously increase their exposure in BTC and ETH, it indicates that the position of leading crypto assets in the medium to long-term asset allocation framework is rising. This could both elevate market expectations for their reasonable valuation centers and form relatively stronger bottom support when risk preferences decline, providing new anchors for the "top heights and bottom strengths" of future cycle fluctuations.
The Path After Whale Bets and Retail Frenzy
In summary, the current visible signals indicate that 0xFB7…e0A3 is continuously expanding its ETH position around an average cost of about $2907.69 and has achieved approximately $2.1 million in early unrealized gains in this round; its past record of $98.18 million in cumulative profits validates the historical win rate of this address. At the same time, the emergence of extreme DeFi yield pools like PENGUIN-USDC 4986% APR and the speculative surge of over 52,000 new tokens in the Solana ecosystem indicate that overall risk preference is clearly in a warming phase. From a neutral judgment of the cycle position, ETH appears to be in a "transition from cold to hot" mid-stage, rather than at an extreme top or deep bottom, with high-risk satellite assets already in a frenzy while leading spots are being orderly absorbed by experienced funds.
It is important to emphasize that neither the building behavior of a single whale address nor the four-digit annualized returns provided by individual DeFi protocols are sufficient to constitute a full causal explanation for market direction and magnitude. They are better suited as high-sensitivity indicators for observing changes in fund preferences, risk appetite, and market structure, rather than simple "trading instructions."
On an operational level, the following three types of signals are worth closely tracking: first, whether 0xFB7…e0A3 will continue to accumulate near the $2800–$2900 cost range or choose to reduce positions to lock in profits, to gauge its confidence in the medium-term trend; second, whether the current extreme DeFi APR will significantly decline in a short time, to measure whether high-leverage speculative sentiment is retreating; third, whether the issuance rhythm of new tokens on Solana will significantly cool from the extreme level of 52,000 tokens/24h, thereby observing the turning point of funds flowing back from small-cap speculation to mainstream assets. These dynamics will reveal potential changes in the direction of funds in the next phase earlier than single price fluctuations.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
