On January 26, 2026, Eastern Standard Time, the international spot gold price historically broke through and stabilized above $5000/ounce, fluctuating within the $5043-$5046/ounce range during the day, with a 24-hour increase of approximately 0.88%-1.1%. This moderate daily increase marked a significant milestone in overcoming a psychological barrier. On the same day, the U.S. Navy's USS Lincoln Carrier Strike Group arrived in the Middle East, coinciding with heightened geopolitical tensions and gold's strong upward movement, leading to a rapid emergence of "risk aversion sentiment" as the dominant narrative. Meanwhile, the sentiment in the crypto market sharply declined, with the Fear and Greed Index dropping to 20, entering the "extreme fear" zone. On one end, gold was seen as a victory moment for risk-averse funds flooding in, while on the other end, the crypto assets faced widespread pressure. Amid this panic, the actions of whales accumulating 81,000 ETH in a single day and selling 93.77 WBTC related to Trump projects added new suspense to this narrative of risk aversion and speculation.
The Key Night of Gold Breaking the $5000 Barrier
● Breakthrough during the day: On January 26, the spot gold price ultimately broke through the $5000/ounce psychological barrier during a fluctuating upward trend, maintaining within the $5043-$5046/ounce range, with a 24-hour increase of about 0.88%-1.1%. This moderate "gentle climb + stable high position" rhythm made the $5000 psychological barrier seem more like a natural market digestion rather than a brief emotional peak.
● Futures and spot resonance: In sync with the spot market, COMEX gold futures also surged on the same day, continuing the upward trend and setting new historical highs alongside spot prices, forming a typical futures-spot resonance pattern. For traders, this indicates that not only is spot demand rising, but also the medium- and short-term bets and hedging demands surrounding gold are amplifying, reinforcing the technical and emotional significance of this barrier.
● Risk aversion narrative: Multiple media and institutions interpreted this breakout as a "significant inflow of risk-averse funds," with $5000 being framed as a new "panic coordinate" in reports and research. For many macro traders and asset allocation managers, gold above $5000 is not just a price point but an emotional anchor reflecting the embodiment of geopolitical and macro uncertainties.
● Speculative bets: In the on-chain and prediction market domains, gold's breakthrough was also heavily bet upon. The final settlement amount for events related to gold prices on Polymarket was approximately $1.62 million, outlining a side path for retail and crypto natives to participate in the global risk aversion narrative beyond traditional assets. Although the scale is not as large as off-exchange funds, it sufficiently reflects the weight of this moment in the minds of speculators.
Intensifying Tensions in the Middle East Ignite Risk Aversion Sentiment Again
● Coinciding timing: On the same day gold broke through $5000, news emerged that the USS Lincoln Carrier Strike Group arrived in the Middle East, further heating up an already tense regional situation. The overlap of geopolitical tensions and gold's ascent provided a highly dramatic narrative backdrop for the market, allowing the assertion that "risk aversion buying drives gold prices" to quickly dominate public discourse.
● Correlation, not causation: From a market perspective, geopolitical tensions are often packaged into a logical chain of "risk-averse buying flooding into gold," and this instance is no exception. However, data does not directly prove a causal relationship; a more prudent statement is that geopolitical uncertainty and gold's upward movement exhibit highly correlated synchronicity under the same macro narrative, rather than being simply attributed to "a specific event directly pushing up gold prices."
● Amplification in public discourse: In traditional financial media headlines and heated discussions on social platforms, phrases like "buy gold in chaotic times" have proliferated, with $5000 being packaged as "a new anchor point in turbulent times." This narrative not only recalls gold's performance during historical crises but also reinforces gold's cultural label as a symbol of risk aversion, making it easier for ordinary investors to equate "tense situations = buy gold" emotionally.
● Preferred choice for risk aversion: As the tail risks brought by geopolitical uncertainty are amplified and global asset pricing volatility increases, gold once again becomes a major tool for institutions and high-net-worth investors to hedge against extreme scenarios. Within a multi-asset allocation framework, gold is viewed as one of the few assets that can still serve as "portfolio insurance" amid fluctuating monetary policies, simultaneous declines in stocks and bonds, and compounded geopolitical shocks.
Crypto Panic Hits Bottom While Whale Actions Diverge
● Emotional low point: In stark contrast to gold's historical high, the sentiment in the crypto market sharply cooled during the same period. Data platform Alternative.me shows that the cryptocurrency Fear and Greed Index has dropped to 20, entering the "extreme fear" zone, indicating that in the emotional quantification model, the vast majority of on-chain and off-chain participants are in a highly defensive state, inclined to reduce positions and observe rather than increase risk exposure.
● Interpretation of the shift in risk aversion preferences: In mainstream discourse, the image of "gold soaring while crypto sentiment freezes" is easily summarized as "risk aversion preferences have shifted from crypto to traditional assets." However, there is currently no direct evidence of capital flows supporting the notion of "capital flowing from crypto into gold"; a more reasonable statement is that the two asset classes exhibit performance divergence and emotional misalignment under the same macro narrative, giving an intuitive impression of one benefiting at the expense of the other.
● Whales increasing positions against the trend: Amid the spread of panic sentiment, on-chain data shows that two whale addresses collectively increased their holdings by approximately 81,000 ETH in a single day, amounting to about $230 million at the time. At a moment when most retail investors chose to reduce positions or observe, this level of buying power undoubtedly amplified the contrast: on one end is the indexed extreme fear, while on the other is the rational accumulation of large funds.
● Risk preference and cyclical perspective: It is important to emphasize that whale accumulation only indicates that participants with larger capital and stronger risk tolerance have different cyclical judgments and asset allocation logic regarding ETH at this stage; it does not imply they possess so-called "insider information" or a certain price path. Official and public information has not disclosed the specific strategic motives, lock-up periods, or coordinated layouts of these addresses, so any interpretation beyond "scale and timing" itself is prone to unfounded narrative speculation.
Trump Project's WBTC Sale Ignites Another Form of Panic
● Sale facts: In contrast to the ETH whale accumulation, Trump-related projects sold 93.77 WBTC in a single day within the same time window, amounting to approximately $8.07 million at the time. In absolute terms, this scale is not large in the context of the entire day's trading in the crypto market, but due to its association with the high-profile narrative of "Trump," its symbolic significance is greatly amplified.
● Backlash of benchmark narratives: In the previous bull market, "Trump + crypto" was once seen as a hallmark storyline intertwining politics and the crypto space, with related assets enjoying excess premiums on an emotional level. Therefore, when projects within this narrative chain exhibit position reduction or liquidation actions, they are easily amplified in communities and media as "high-level selling" or "narrative peaking," even if this is merely a limited on-chain operation.
● Amplifier of transmission: Screenshots, on-chain records, and secondary interpretations of this sale quickly spread on social platforms, creating a negative echo effect with the previously declining fear index. For emotionally sensitive retail investors, negative signals represented by "Trump project sales" not only intensified concerns about WBTC itself but also psychologically extended to the entire crypto market, further suppressing risk appetite.
● Divergent reflections: If the ETH whale's counter-trend buying represents a type of capital seeking medium- to long-term positions amid panic, then the sale of WBTC related to Trump projects seems more like another type of narrative-driven capital choosing to liquidate positions amid rising uncertainty. Together, they outline the competition among different factions of capital within crypto, with varying time perspectives and risk-return preferences, rather than a singular direction of "collective fleeing" or "collective bottom-fishing."
The Illusion and Reality of Gold and Crypto's Divergence
● The temptation of intuitive narratives: In mainstream financial reporting and social media, the phrase "gold has siphoned off crypto's risk-averse funds" has become the most easily spread slogan in this market cycle. This narrative exploits the opposing price and emotional trends of the two asset classes, constructing a simple, understandable story framework that aligns with public intuition, while neglecting the critical premise of missing data on capital flows.
● Synchronization does not equal causation: Current public information has not provided verifiable, direct paths of capital migration, making it impossible to prove the existence of a clear chain of "large-scale outflows from crypto, turning to buy gold." A more rigorous understanding is that under the same macro and geopolitical narrative, gold and crypto synchronously experienced emotional shocks in the time dimension, yet exhibited different performances in price and capital preferences; this "synchronous yet divergent" picture is far more complex than a simple "one benefiting at the expense of the other" story.
● Different scripts for different funds: From the perspective of investor behavior, conservative capital tends to increase allocations to traditional safe-haven assets like gold during periods of rising uncertainty to pursue a decrease in portfolio volatility; while more aggressive capital may choose to stealthily accumulate suppressed crypto positions during panic phases, betting on a rebound in risk appetite at some future point. These two behaviors are not simply oppositional but are different scripts playing out in parallel within the same market environment.
● Beware of singular narratives: Whether it is the "risk-averse hero" narrative of gold or the "capital being drained" narrative of crypto, there is a tendency to explain all price fluctuations with a single story. At this stage, it is crucial to be wary of attributing short-term sharp fluctuations simply to an isolated event—be it a geopolitical shock, a project sale, or the actions of a whale address—while overlooking deeper variables such as the overall macro cycle, liquidity environment, and regulatory expectations.
The Risk Aversion Story is Not Over; Who Will Be the Next Winner?
Gold's stabilization above $5000/ounce on January 26 indeed symbolizes a phase victory for traditional safe-haven assets amid rising geopolitical and macro uncertainties. However, from the less than 1% daily increase, it appears more like a key breakthrough in a natural upward trend rather than a complete emotional runaway. In contrast, the complex picture woven together during the same period by the tense situation in the Middle East, the crypto fear index dropping to 20, the ETH whales increasing positions against the trend, and the sale of WBTC related to Trump projects reveals the multi-faceted hedging of global capital between risk aversion, defense, and speculation.
Looking ahead, if geopolitical tensions and macro uncertainties continue to ferment, gold and crypto are likely to follow more divergent trajectories along the paths of "safe-haven assets" and "high-volatility speculative assets": the former continuing to play a role in hedging extreme scenarios within portfolio allocations, while the latter may experience dramatic rotations of high beta amid extreme emotions and alternating liquidity conditions. For market participants, what deserves more attention is not the sharp fluctuations in a single day's price but the evolving macro data, policy expectations, and changes in on-chain capital distribution over time, using verifiable evidence rather than current emotions to judge whether the divergence between gold and crypto is a temporary misalignment or a long-term ebb and flow.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
