In the East 8th District time this week, the crypto market witnessed the Ethereum Foundation publicly forming a post-quantum team while also experiencing a continued net outflow of funds from Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs, highlighting a stark contrast between long-term security investments and short-term risk-averse sentiments. Meanwhile, approximately 15,600 ETH concentrated back to CEXs like Binance and Coinbase, with mining company Bitdeer slightly increasing its holdings during the pullback. The Bitcoin derivatives platform Paradex faced a technical failure that triggered erroneous liquidations, requiring a total refund of $650,000 to about 200 users. The migration of funds and infrastructure risks together outline the current complex landscape of the market.
Ethereum's Defense Against the Post-Quantum Era
● Formation of the post-quantum team: The Ethereum Foundation has announced the establishment of a dedicated team focused on post-quantum cryptography, led by Thomas Coratger. The core mission has shifted from previous academic research to a more systematic approach closer to engineering implementation. Ethereum researcher Justin Drake emphasized that this represents a shift from "long-term post-quantum research to public engineering practice," indicating that Ethereum is no longer satisfied with conceptual discussions but is beginning to reserve a safety buffer for the future evolution of protocols.
● Identifying potential threats: Quantum computing is believed to potentially undermine or even destroy the security assumptions of current on-chain assets through breakthroughs targeting public key cryptosystems and elliptic curve signature algorithms. Ethereum's bet on post-quantum directions is relatively leading among mainstream public chains, attempting to complete the iteration of algorithms and protocols before the real threat of quantum computing arrives, providing "intergenerational" security upgrade options for on-chain assets.
● Strategy over catalysts: Currently, the official details regarding the specific technical route, migration path, and timeline have not been disclosed, nor are there clear implementation phase nodes made public. In the absence of details, this action should be viewed more as a long-term security strategic investment rather than a price catalyst event that can be realized within a few quarters. In the short term, the related narrative is more reflected in the market's repricing of Ethereum's long-term security premium rather than direct trading triggers.
CEX Absorbs 15,600 ETH…
● Large platforms absorbing 15,600 ETH: Statistics show that recent centralized exchanges have collectively seen a net inflow of approximately 15,600 ETH, with Binance seeing a net inflow of about 9,262.76 ETH and Coinbase Pro about 4,557.64 ETH, with the remaining inflows dispersed across smaller platforms. This structure indicates that during a phase of heightened volatility and regulatory uncertainty, funds are more willing to concentrate their chips within the larger exchange systems that have deeper liquidity and higher compliance levels to retain maneuverability.
● Trading intentions behind the inflow: Historically, the concentration of ETH in CEXs often signifies an increase in trading willingness, whether it be for spot position reduction, hedging sales, or cross-platform arbitrage based on futures and options, all of which require assets to be migrated to on-site matching systems. In the current environment where macro and regulatory prospects remain unclear, this inflow appears more like "preparing ammunition" for potential large position adjustments, waiting for external variables to clarify before making directional reallocations.
● Technical benefits and selling pressure coexist: On one hand, Ethereum is releasing long-term technical benefits in the post-quantum direction, while on the other hand, there is significant concentration within the exchanges under short-term price pressure. This net inflow of approximately 15,600 ETH is difficult to simply interpret as a one-way bullish or bearish move. A more reasonable understanding is that funds are laying the groundwork for the next step of high-frequency trading and structural adjustments, allowing for rapid execution in a high liquidity environment, whether it be a trend-following reduction or a counterattack based on positive news.
ETF Sees Nearly $150 Million Outflow in a Day…
● ETF simultaneous net outflow: In contrast to the inflow of ETH into CEXs, there has been a noticeable retreat on the U.S. spot ETF side. Data shows that Bitcoin spot ETFs experienced a net outflow of approximately $10.35 to $10.4 million in a single day, while Ethereum spot ETFs saw a net outflow of about $4.17 to $4.17358 million, totaling nearly $150 million. The simultaneous withdrawal of these two major assets from regulated products reflects a strengthening consensus among institutions to reduce their crypto exposure through traditional financial channels.
● Uncertainty surrounding regulatory expectations: The choice to withdraw from ETFs, a compliant vehicle, is usually associated with unease regarding future regulatory and policy directions. The current market generally views U.S. regulation and potential policy adjustments as one of the possible reasons, but there has not been any clear signal in the public information that could directly trigger large-scale redemptions. In the absence of specific events, this round of net outflows appears more like a passive rebalancing of macro interest rates, regulatory tone, and overall pricing of risk assets.
● Discrepancy between on-chain activity and secondary contraction: On one side, ETH is concentrating in CEXs, and on-chain and on-site trading willingness is heating up; on the other side, institutional funds in the ETF channel are choosing to reduce their positions and exit, creating a clear cyclical discrepancy between "domestic and foreign" and "on-chain/off-chain." ETF holders are often constrained by mid- to long-term allocations and compliance obligations, while CEX and on-chain participants tend to favor short-term or strategic trading. This structural difference causes the same asset to exhibit opposite flow trajectories across different vehicles.
Bitdeer Increases Holdings Against the Trend…
● Mining companies slightly increasing holdings: Against the backdrop of price fluctuations and ETF fund outflows, Bitcoin mining company Bitdeer currently holds approximately 1,504.4 BTC and has recently chosen to slightly increase its holdings by 2.3 BTC. This pace continues the usual strategy of leading mining companies to buy on dips during pullbacks, based more on future output, hash rate competition, and cash flow discount models rather than following short-term emotional fluctuations, reflecting a long-term perspective in asset-liability management logic.
● Paradex's technical incident exposes vulnerabilities: In contrast to the steady accumulation by mining companies, the derivatives platform Paradex triggered an erroneous liquidation event due to a technical failure, being forced to commit to refunding a total of $650,000 to about 200 users. This incident highlights that in high-leverage, high-frequency trading scenarios, any minor error in the matching engine, risk control, and liquidation modules can amplify into significant losses at the user level, further undermining some funds' trust in DeFi and emerging derivatives infrastructure.
● Layering of risk preferences and infrastructure constraints: On one side, mining companies relying on long-term cash flow and hash rate advantages are slowly increasing their holdings; on the other side, the clearing incidents caused by technical flaws in high-frequency leveraged scenarios sketch out the layered structure of risk preferences in the current market. For more conservative long-term funds, the reliability and accountability of infrastructure are becoming key variables in deciding whether to increase crypto exposure, while events like Paradex remind the market that the quality of technical infrastructure itself is imposing hard constraints on fund flows.
Dislocation of Funds and Technological Outlook: Overlapping Timelines
● Long-term security investments versus short-term sentiments: Ethereum's early layout in quantum security represents long-term security capital expenditure, aimed at providing "insurance" for future protocols and asset security. In parallel, the volatility represented by ETF redemptions and CEX liquidity migrations reflects more of a repricing of sentiments on a quarterly or even weekly basis. The overlapping decisions across different timelines mean that the same asset may face short-term pressure but continue to accumulate chips on long-term security premiums.
● Funds are not exiting in a single direction: The current market appearance is characterized by ETF fund withdrawals, CEX ETH concentration, slight increases in mining company holdings, and simultaneous DeFi incidents, but the underlying logic is not simply a "retreat tide." A closer interpretation of the facts is that funds are migrating and repricing between different vehicles: some institutions are reducing compliant exposure through ETFs, some trading funds are shifting to more liquid CEXs or on-chain protocols, while high-risk preference funds are reassessing the technical and compliance thresholds of derivatives platforms after the incidents.
● Valuation reconstruction of security premiums: For mid- to long-term allocators, on one hand, there is a need to assess Ethereum's technological leadership in post-quantum cryptography to determine whether it can win a higher "security premium" for on-chain assets in the future; on the other hand, it is also essential to recognize the security shortcomings exposed by current DeFi and derivatives infrastructure, incorporating potential incident risks and trust discounts into the valuation framework. A truly robust pricing model must account for both the positive factors of future security enhancements and the negative factors of existing infrastructure defects.
Quantum Shadows and Fund Retreats…
● Short-term withdrawals versus long-term commitments: From the disclosed data, short-term funds are more likely to withdraw exposure through ETF channels and strengthen trading and hedging behaviors through CEXs, while truly long-term funds based on multi-year perspectives have not significantly retreated from mining companies and Ethereum's technological layout. Bitdeer's increase in holdings and the establishment of Ethereum's post-quantum team indicate that beneath price fluctuations and emotional contractions, there are still some entities quietly increasing their investments in underlying security and production assets.
● Beware of single narratives amplifying volatility: Currently, whether it is the "quantum shadow" or "ETF retreat," both remain in the early stages of engineering and fund flow dynamics, and post-quantum solutions still require time to materialize. Regulatory and funding aspects are also undergoing repeated adjustments. In such a phase, overcommitting to any single narrative—whether viewing post-quantum as a catalyst for an immediate bull market or interpreting ETF redemptions as a long-term peak signal—could amplify position volatility and decision-making errors.
● Centering security in allocation decisions: A more rational strategy is to continuously track the marginal changes in Ethereum's post-quantum progress and ETF fund directions while significantly enhancing the ability to identify risks in trading venues and DeFi protocols, making security and credibility one of the core dimensions of asset allocation. In the current overlap of multiple timelines, those who can build a solid security margin while pursuing returns will have a better chance of navigating through the multiple cycles of regulation, technology, and the market.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
