As of the morning of January 24, based on data from January 23 Eastern Time, the U.S. Ethereum spot ETF experienced a net outflow of approximately $41.7 million in a single day, marking the fourth consecutive trading day of capital withdrawal. This phase shift is not an isolated event: structurally, BlackRock ETHA recorded significant net outflows, while Grayscale Mini Trust saw a slight net inflow against the trend, indicating product differentiation within the same category; horizontally, Bitcoin spot ETFs are also in a phase of continuous net outflows, reflecting a cooling risk appetite among institutions for crypto assets overall. Finding the boundary of capital sentiment between the historically accumulated $12.3 billion net inflow and the current continuous outflow has become key to assessing the nature of this adjustment.
The Position and Volume of Funds Illustrated by the $41.7 Million Outflow Over Four Days
● Composition of Funds and Temporal Context: According to data from January 23 Eastern Time, the U.S. Ethereum spot ETF saw a total net outflow of approximately $41.7 million in a single day, marking a rare fourth consecutive day of capital exit since the beginning of the year. In terms of rhythm, this outflow is not an isolated redemption of a single product, but rather multiple leading ETFs recorded negative subscriptions on the same trading day, compounding the effect and amplifying this single-day figure in the market as a signal of "phase retreat."
● Cumulative Net Inflow and Inflection Point: As of now, the historical cumulative net inflow of the Ethereum spot ETF is approximately $12.3 billion. The recent single-day outflow of $41.7 million remains limited in proportion, more akin to the first significant "bend" in the capital curve after a long period of smooth net inflows. In terms of magnitude, this scale is insufficient to alter the overall pattern of long-term capital inflows, but it is enough to indicate that the previously unidirectional capital absorption state has been disrupted, prompting a reassessment of Ethereum's risk-return structure.
● ETF Size and Market Value Weight: Currently, the total net asset value of U.S. Ethereum spot ETFs is approximately $17.7 billion, corresponding to about 4.99% of Ethereum's total market capitalization. This means that while ETFs do not yet dominate the entire circulation of ETH, they have become an important factor influencing marginal buying and selling power. Any percentage change in either direction could have a magnifying effect on the order book of the spot market, causing ETF capital flows to gradually evolve from a "reference indicator" to one of the important driving factors of price volatility.
BlackRock's Selling Pressure and Grayscale Mini Trust's Counter-Trend Capital Inflow
● Outflow Pressure from Leading Products: In the overall net outflow on January 23, BlackRock ETHA recorded a net outflow of approximately $44.49 million (Farside data), with the redemption scale of this single product exceeding the total net outflow of the entire Ethereum spot ETF market for that day, indicating that some other products still experienced slight inflows or remained flat. Considering ETHA's leading position in this category, this figure directly influenced the overall conclusion of the "$41.7 million net outflow," also indicating a clearer reduction action in the capital attitude of mainstream institutional channels.
● Continuity of Inflows into Grayscale Mini Trust: In stark contrast to ETHA, Grayscale Mini Trust ETF recorded a net inflow of approximately $9.16 million (SoSoValue data) that day, and its historical net inflow has accumulated to approximately $1.643 billion. This shows that some institutional funds have not chosen to fully withdraw from Ethereum exposure but prefer to maintain or slightly adjust their positions through more competitively priced and structurally streamlined mini trust products, forming a counter-trend but sustained capital inflow against the backdrop of overall capital outflow.
● Institutional Logic Behind Counter-Trend Allocation: While overall capital is generally reducing positions, the continued inflow into Grayscale Mini Trust reflects more of a product-level cost-effectiveness and structural demand rather than a complete denial of Ethereum assets themselves. Some institutions may take advantage of the redemption of mainstream ETFs and the price correction in the secondary market to reallocate through tools with more controllable costs, achieving a rebalancing between "the same asset, different vehicles." This also explains why, despite an overall net outflow, we can still observe positive subscriptions in certain products.
The Correlation Effect of Concurrent Outflows in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
● Continuous Net Outflow of Bitcoin ETFs: Meanwhile, Bitcoin spot ETFs are also in a capital exit cycle, with data showing continuous net outflows exceeding $100 million for five consecutive days. This indicates that in the larger BTC ETF market, redemption pressure is also accumulating, with a longer duration and larger single-day scale, as the "crypto asset indexation allocation" anchored by Bitcoin is undergoing a systemic reduction adjustment, rather than being limited to a single chain or narrative.
● Risk Appetite Contraction from a Cross-Asset Perspective: When both BTC and ETH spot ETFs experience simultaneous capital outflows over several days, the signal conveyed by the market is closer to "a cooling of risk appetite for the entire category of crypto assets." For institutions allocating multi-asset portfolios, the reduction often targets not a specific public chain but rather compresses weights on "high volatility, high Beta assets," leading to a synchronous resonance in capital flows for both ETFs, deepening the self-reinforcement of weak risk sentiment.
● Reflection of Changes in Macroeconomic Expectations: This round of joint outflows roughly coincides with the global reassessment of macro policy paths and interest rate expectations. Although existing information is insufficient to directly attribute capital outflows to specific policy events, it is reasonable to infer that in a more uncertain macro environment, some institutions choose to first reduce their exposure to high-volatility assets to free up liquidity and risk budgets. Thus, the ETF capital curve becomes a magnifying glass for changes in macro sentiment, rather than an isolated micro-financial phenomenon.
Tactical Reduction or Trend Reversal from Continuous Redemptions
● Distinguishing Tactical Adjustments from Trend Signals: Comparing the current four-day continuous net outflow with the previous long period of predominantly net inflows, it can be seen that capital behavior has entered a "high-level game" phase. A single-day outflow of $41.7 million is more akin to a tactical reduction or profit-taking after significant historical net buying, rather than a definitive trend reversal signal. A true trend reversal often requires observing sustained, increased negative redemption data over a longer time dimension.
● Potential Impact on Price and Volatility: Structurally, the ETFs currently hold approximately $17.7 billion in ETH, accounting for about 4.99% of the overall market capitalization. Marginal changes in this position can significantly disturb the buying and selling balance in the spot market. Short-term continuous outflows will weaken buying thickness and enhance selling pressure perception, thereby increasing ETH price volatility; however, as long as the overall holding ratio remains in single digits, ETF capital is still insufficient to unilaterally dominate prices, but rather shapes short-term volatility ranges in conjunction with on-chain capital and derivatives leverage.
● Observation Window and Confirmation Demand: A more reasonable interpretation at this stage is to view this round of outflows as a candidate scenario for a "phase adjustment," rather than immediately concluding it as "long-term capital contraction." The ETF subscription and redemption data over the next few trading days will be key for verification: if net outflows quickly converge or even restore net inflows, it leans towards tactical adjustment; if there are sustained days of increased outflows, it indicates that some institutions are systematically reducing Ethereum's long-term weight in their portfolios.
The Pull of Expansion and RWA Narratives on Mid- to Long-Term Allocations
● Reverse Capital Expansion Bets: While ETF data signals short-term cooling, some institutional funds are still choosing to layout in reverse. Liquid Capital founder Li Hua Yi publicly stated that they are buying ETH on dips and betting on Ethereum as a "capital platform" expansion opportunity. This statement shows that some professional investors are more focused on Ethereum's role in settlement layers and capital market infrastructure over the next few years, rather than short-term price pullbacks, viewing the current adjustment as an opportunity window to increase long-term exposure.
● Demand Clues for RWA and Ecological Expansion: OKX CEO Star mentioned in an official event that they will promote more RWA assets to be on-chain to enrich the X Layer ecosystem. Behind such statements is the expectation of expanding the combination space of "traditional assets + on-chain infrastructure": if more real-world assets are integrated into the chain through Ethereum-related second layers or ecosystems, the corresponding trading volume, settlement demand, and institutional participation are expected to elevate the demand for ETH as collateral and settlement assets in the mid- to long-term, providing new fundamental support for the long-term allocation logic of ETFs.
● How Narratives and Fundamentals Shape ETF Reallocation: In the mid- to long-term, whether institutions will reallocate to Ethereum ETFs after the current outflows largely depends on whether expansion paths, RWA practices, and other narratives can translate into substantial fundamental improvements. If Ethereum can find a better balance between throughput, cost, and security, and accommodate the increment of RWA and capital market applications, then even if ETFs experience redemptions in the short term, a new capital inflow cycle may still emerge in the mid- to long-term; conversely, if narratives remain at the expectation level, capital is more likely to shift allocations to other assets with better risk-return ratios.
Observation Window from Local Retreat to Global Game
● Concentrated Signals of Risk Appetite Cooling: In summary, current data shows that the U.S. Ethereum spot ETF has experienced four consecutive days of net outflows, with the latest single-day scale of approximately $41.7 million, while Bitcoin spot ETFs have seen continuous net outflows exceeding $100 million for five days. The simultaneous "bleeding" of these two flagship asset ETFs during the same period constitutes a concentrated signal of overall cooling in crypto asset risk appetite, indicating that the previously unidirectional "institutional buying narrative" is entering a more complex game phase.
● Institutional Differentiation Rather Than Unidirectional Withdrawal: At the same time, the Grayscale Mini Trust still recorded a net inflow of $9.16 million that day, with historical net inflows accumulating to approximately $1.643 billion, indicating that not all institutions are choosing to exit. On the contrary, some funds are making structural adjustments at the product level, achieving "changing vehicles without changing roads" through rebalancing in terms of fees, liquidity, and taxation, suggesting that the market is closer to a "differentiated game between bulls and bears across multiple products," rather than a simple unidirectional withdrawal.
● Key Indicators to Track: Moving forward, the key to assessing the nature of this adjustment lies in continuously tracking several types of data and developments: first, the daily subscription and redemption data of Ethereum and Bitcoin spot ETFs to confirm whether the capital outflow is a phase phenomenon or a new round of long-term contraction; second, the changes in macro-level interest rates and policy expectations to evaluate the relative attractiveness of high-volatility assets among major asset classes; third, the specific implementation of Ethereum's ecosystem in terms of expansion, RWA, and capital market applications. Only by forming a clearer consensus across these dimensions can the market provide new pricing conclusions on "the long-term allocation value of Ethereum ETFs."
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
