On January 28th, at the time of the East 8th District, the project team used this moment to announce that the Moonbirds ecosystem token BIRB will be launched on the Solana chain. Although the specific year has not been disclosed in public information, it is enough to ignite the market's imagination about this "cross-chain token issuance." There are voices claiming that the floor price of Moonbirds' NFTs has increased by over 10% within 24 hours, with a price of about 2.48 ETH on OpenSea. These data are currently in a "to be verified" status, yet they are closely tied to the BIRB narrative. A well-established NFT IP born on Ethereum choosing to issue its key ecosystem token on Solana signifies a new bet on the public chain landscape, costs, and user structure, as well as a re-evaluation of risks associated with the original community and brand path.

From Blue Chip Myth to Seeking a Comeback with Moonbirds

● Early Moonbirds were regarded as one of the "blue chip NFTs" on Ethereum due to their scarce avatar attributes, community engagement, and endorsements from top KOLs, with secondary market premiums and brand spillover effects reinforcing each other. However, with the overall cooling of the NFT market, the retreat of speculative sentiment, and the constant iteration of new narratives, the popularity and price performance of this IP have significantly declined, laying the narrative groundwork for seeking a "comeback" through the BIRB token.

● There are claims in the market that the Moonbirds ecosystem began to gradually move towards gamification and tokenization only after being acquired by Orange Cap Games, ultimately leading to the launch of BIRB. However, the "acquisition" itself and its timeline are still marked as "to be verified" information, lacking authoritative disclosure and formal documentation support. Therefore, when constructing the narrative background, this acquisition rumor seems more like a post-facto explanation from the market regarding the project's shift rather than a confirmed fact.

● As the news of BIRB's launch on Solana spreads, market discourse has begun to include statements like "Moonbirds' floor price is warming up due to BIRB," with some content attributed to Decrypt's report, but the related price increases and specific quotes have all been clearly marked as "to be verified" in research briefs. This indicates that there remains an information gap between the narrative of "comeback" at the public opinion level and the on-chain and platform data, requiring investors to distinguish between the amplification of sentiment in the communication chain and actual trading behavior.

Anchoring Ethereum but Choosing to Issue Tokens on Solana

● As an NFT project rooted in Ethereum, Moonbirds' choice to issue BIRB on Solana carries a strong strategic signal: lower gas costs, higher throughput, and a lighter interaction experience are conducive to lowering the participation threshold for the token, supporting more frequent gamification, incentives, and on-chain interaction scenarios. From a user growth perspective, Solana's active addresses and on-chain native capital also open up a different incremental pool for BIRB compared to traditional ETH NFT players.

● In recent months, Solana has been heating up on the narratives of meme, NFT, and token issuance, with several new projects completing "on-chain experiments" from cold starts to large-scale dissemination in a short time. By placing its ecosystem token on this public chain, Moonbirds seems to be deliberately leveraging a "capital and sentiment amplifier" that has already been validated, attempting to retell the IP story through a multi-chain layout rather than merely relying on the increasingly crowded and costly old battleground of Ethereum.

● This cross-chain choice simultaneously creates recognition and interest conflicts for both communities: for early holders deeply tied to Ethereum, migrating the key value carrier to Solana may easily trigger concerns of "dilution" and "marginalization"; for Solana users accustomed to high-speed speculation, an old IP from ETH represents both a new story and an outsider that needs to be reassessed in terms of price and liquidity. How to redefine profit expectations and participation thresholds between the two communities will determine whether BIRB can truly realize the multi-chain narrative.

How BIRB Token Expectations Can Feed Back into Moonbirds

● In the common model of NFTs plus tokens, "airdrop expectations" and "ecosystem revenue distribution" are often the key logic guiding early capital layout. The market's bet on the recovery of Moonbirds' floor price is largely based on: old holders may receive BIRB allocations, the new token may share secondary market or ecosystem revenue in the future, and enjoying priority experiences in gamified scenarios, among other imaginations. These mechanisms have not yet been fully disclosed by the project team but have already been factored into the emotional premium in the secondary market.

● Current widely circulated figures, such as "Moonbirds NFT floor price increased by over 10% in 24 hours" and "OpenSea price around 2.48 ETH," have all been clearly marked as "to be verified" in research briefs and cannot be used as rigorous market conclusions. They are more like emotional reference points derived from the news of BIRB's launch rather than reliable data for quantitative judgment, reminding us to maintain necessary skepticism and cross-verification when faced with rapidly disseminated data screenshots.

● What truly holds long-term significance is whether BIRB can tightly bind NFT holders with the token economy on Solana through permissions, use cases, and gamified scenarios in the future, such as limiting certain gameplay or governance rights exclusively to the Moonbirds+BIRB combination, or making the token a real participation credential in on-chain games and activities. If these mechanisms can operate continuously, NFTs themselves will no longer just be "avatar assets" but will become equity tickets to enter a new economic system, thus forming a more stable value closed loop.

Coinbase Roadmap and Early Pricing Games

● Research briefs indicate that Coinbase has included Doodles (DOOD) and Moonbirds (BIRB) in its asset listing roadmap. This action is interpreted by the market as a signal of compliance and review expectations, while also being seen as an indirect endorsement of the commercial potential of the related IP by mainstream platforms. For a new token like BIRB, appearing on the roadmap itself carries a significant emotional boost.

● From past experience, centralized exchanges' "roadmaps" often create an expected valuation anchor and future liquidity imagination for tokens even before they officially launch. Capital will revolve around "whether it can land on major exchanges early" and "how deep the first-day trading will be," leading to early positioning in secondary and over-the-counter markets, making BIRB's early price structure likely distorted by these roadmap signals and derived emotions before it actually goes live.

● Historically, there have been many cases where "being included in the roadmap" triggered short-term surges that ultimately failed to materialize on the fundamentals, with prices quickly retracing after emotional peaks. Viewing BIRB within this coordinate system means that one cannot regard a single positive factor—whether it is the Coinbase roadmap or the cross-chain narrative—as a sufficient condition for long-term value; investors need to remain sufficiently vigilant about the old script of "realizing benefits and then offloading."

Birbathon Topics and Information Asymmetry

● Research briefs mention that key information about BIRB was concentrated in a 24-hour Birbathon joint event, which is seen as a focal point for the token narrative's exposure. However, the specific time, guest lineup, and detailed agenda of the event currently lack publicly verifiable details and are explicitly prohibited from speculation. Therefore, when discussing Birbathon, it can only be viewed as an amplifier of information and sentiment, rather than a basis for deducing any certain timeline.

● In terms of communication rhythm, the project team can create a significant FOMO atmosphere in a short time by releasing core information about the token, potential use cases, and future roadmap through limited-time event spaces, AMAs, or live broadcasts, combined with retweets from secondary platforms and social media, to preheat BIRB's on-chain liquidity. This rhythm has been repeatedly validated in the crypto market: the dense release of information itself is part of the redistribution of chips.

● At nodes like Birbathon, different participant groups will give entirely different interpretations of the same information: old Moonbirds holders are more concerned about how the token will compensate for past losses and enhance long-term rights, while short-term speculators are more focused on first-day on-chain profits and exit windows, and Solana users coming from cross-chain see it as another round of "new stories impacting old assets" for arbitrage opportunities. Once these expectation differences collide in the secondary market, they can easily evolve into violent fluctuations in short-term transactions and conflicts of interest among holders.

Is Cross-Chain Token Issuance a Comeback Battle or Accelerated Liquidation?

In summary, the early brand reputation of Moonbirds, the recent ecological heat of Solana, and the signal of Coinbase including BIRB in its roadmap collectively package this cross-chain token issuance as a "window for old IP self-rescue," which is also a highly attractive but equally high-risk gaming field. It could either become the starting point for Moonbirds to reshape its valuation through new public chain narratives and token mechanisms, or it may just be another wave of short-term market activity redistributing chips based on emotional windows. The true watershed will depend on whether the project team can implement complex multi-chain coordination and token incentive design into sustainable products and community structures.

There are still many key gaps in the current information system: the specific token economic design of BIRB, the year and timeline of TGE, various rights and distribution rules, etc., have not been publicly disclosed or allowed for inference. These variables will directly determine whether the story is fleeting or can be a long-term structure that compounds over time. Under the premise of these core parameters being absent, any valuation and trend judgment based on "imagination space" will inevitably carry speculative colors.

For participants, a more prudent path is to strictly distinguish between narrative volume and verifiable facts: on one hand, focus on the project team's subsequent disclosures regarding token mechanisms, cross-chain strategies, and product implementation through official channels; on the other hand, combine on-chain data and trading depth to assess the extent to which real capital behavior supports prices, rather than making decisions solely based on social media screenshots and single positive factors. In the stage where the story is just beginning to gain momentum but information is still insufficient, delaying decisions and waiting for more verifiable data is often more beneficial for constructing a rational judgment framework for the medium to long term.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。