On the evening of January 23, 2026, East 8 Time, on-chain monitoring showed that an address related to Pendle investors or the team transferred 1.8 million PENDLE to the exchange Bybit about 7 hours ago. Based on the price at the time of transfer, it is estimated to be worth approximately 3.83 million USD. These tokens were initially unlocked linearly through vesting contracts between April 2022 and April 2023, with a total market value of about 266,000 USD at that time, and their current book value has increased to several times that amount. The sudden "movement" of these long-held tokens into the exchange has raised significant market attention regarding potential selling pressure, emotional fluctuations, and changes in the behavior of long-term Pendle holders.

Tokens That Have Not Moved for Three Years Suddenly Enter the Market

● Unlock Timeline: According to public information, the PENDLE held by this address mainly comes from the linear unlocking of vesting contracts from April 2022 to April 2023, gradually acquiring tokens over about a year rather than receiving them all at once. This means that the holder established their position early in the project and experienced a complete bull-bear cycle after the unlocking was completed, providing a longer observation and decision-making window, making their behavior more representative.

● Holding vs. Selling Claims: Market monitoring reports cite a single source indicating that this address "has basically not sold" during the approximately three years of holding PENDLE. This statement remains a conclusion from the public monitoring party and requires further verification through on-chain data. Investors should distinguish between confirmed data and analytical inferences when citing this, avoiding treating unverified claims as conclusions.

● Background of Floating Profit Multiples: Based on the data provided in the briefing, the total market value of this batch of tokens during the unlocking period was approximately 266,000 USD, while the transfer to Bybit is valued at about 3.83 million USD at market price, resulting in a floating profit of over ten times. Such a high return multiple, combined with the long holding period, makes questions like "whether to realize some profits" and "whether to adjust asset allocation" reasonable considerations for the holder, also increasing market speculation about their motives for transferring.

The Impact of 1.8 Million Tokens on the Exchange

● Relative Scale Assessment: In absolute terms, 1.8 million PENDLE is a large amount for a single transfer, but its impact on the market needs to be compared with the total circulation of the project and the average daily trading volume across the network. If we reference the common circulation scale of hundreds of millions of mainstream DeFi tokens and daily trading volumes in the tens of millions of dollars, this batch of tokens seems more like a challenge to the upper limit of short-term liquidity rather than a "nuclear-level" supply shock that could dominate medium to long-term trends.

● Bybit and Overall Depth: According to the briefing data, this transfer corresponds to a nominal value of about 3.83 million USD. For the PENDLE trading pair on the single platform Bybit, if the visible buy order depth in the order book is mainly concentrated in the range of hundreds of thousands to a couple of million dollars, once this batch of tokens is listed, it could significantly alter the order structure; however, from a global market perspective, the combined depth across multiple platforms and the arbitrage mechanism will partially hedge the impact, making price pressure more reflected in short-term volatility rather than sustained imbalance.

● Transfer Does Not Equal Sale: It is important to emphasize that "transferring to an exchange ≠ inevitable selling." Large token transfers may correspond to various operational intentions, including adjusting position structures, serving as margin, hedging, or merely increasing liquidity reserves. Under these premises, the order book quotes may still widen due to expectations of potential selling pressure in the short term, with proactive order behaviors becoming more conservative, leading to increased slippage and reduced depth. However, this is a microstructural change driven by behavioral expectations, not an automatically triggered liquidation event.

Token Unlocking Rhythm and Timing of Long-Term Token Movement

● Unlock Model and Token Source: As a DeFi yield protocol, Pendle's token economic model includes a linear unlocking mechanism, gradually releasing tokens for early investors, teams, or ecosystem incentives through vesting contracts over a specified period. The 1.8 million PENDLE transferred to Bybit corresponds directly to the linear unlocking phase from April 2022 to April 2023, representing a typical case of "long-term retention after unlocking" rather than short-term speculative funds in the secondary market.

● Time Lag and Behavioral Patterns: It is noteworthy that nearly two years have passed since the unlocking was completed, during which there have been no records of similar large-scale transfers, making this sudden large transfer a stark contrast. This "delayed realization" behavior suggests that the unlocking design did not immediately trigger selling pressure but completely handed decision-making power to the holders, shifting the tokens from institutional constraints to pure market choices. The timing of their long-term accumulation and subsequent liquidity is influenced by price, liquidity conditions, and the holders' own asset allocation needs.

● Fundamentals and Token Flow: During this period, the Pendle protocol, as a yield product, underwent functional iterations and market expansion, with changes in both protocol TVL and user structure. The timing window for this concentrated token transfer is time-correlated with these fundamental evolutions, but it does not suffice to derive a simple causal relationship. A more prudent understanding is to view it as a sample of long-term participants re-evaluating the current project phase and market valuation, rather than a direct vote on the quality of the fundamentals.

How the Largest Single On-Chain Transfer Amplifies Emotion

● Uniqueness at the Record Level: Some media outlets have cited monitoring data stating that this is the "known largest single on-chain transfer event" in the Pendle ecosystem, highlighting the rarity of this transaction from the perspective of on-chain records. The size and single transfer nature make it more easily captured and highlighted by data service providers and social platforms, thereby amplifying its visibility in public opinion beyond its actual weight in token distribution.

● Distinction Between Facts and Interpretation: What can be objectively verified on-chain are the address, quantity, time, and destination being the Bybit address, while "whether it is sold" or "whether it is bearish" belongs to the subjective interpretation of market participants. Simply attributing subsequent price fluctuations entirely to a single transfer event overlooks the macro environment and other funding behaviors, and may lead to "overfitting" in the narrative. Investors need to layer their analysis of on-chain events and market changes to avoid emotional attribution.

● Pathways for Emotional Amplification: Large transfer screenshots often spread first among data bots and KOL accounts, with narrative tags evolving from "whale entering the exchange" to "potential dumping," rapidly amplifying through retweets, comments, and secondary creations. Under this accumulation, emotional indicators and short-term trading behaviors can easily form self-reinforcing expectations— even if real selling pressure has not yet emerged, some short-term funds may have already reduced positions or canceled orders, further exacerbating volatility and completing the "news → expectations → behavior → price" loop in a short time.

Attention Competition Intertwined with Other Hotspots

● Dispersive Effects of Concurrent Events: Within the approximate time window of this transfer, the market was also focused on news such as DeepBook launching leveraged trading features and Farcaster founder clarifying the protocol's operational status. These developments from different sectors attracted the attention of their respective communities and funds, resulting in a multi-centered distribution of overall attention in the crypto market rather than a single focus on Pendle.

● Marginal Impact Diluted: In the context of multiple concurrent events, the marginal impact of Pendle's single transfer event on overall market fund flows and price fluctuations is more likely to be "diluted." Some panic or chasing emotions that could have been amplified in a single event environment may be drawn away by other narratives, reflected in the market as coexistence of localized severe volatility and an overall relatively controllable structure, reducing the probability of any single news event hijacking the entire sector's trend.

● The Necessity of a Data Perspective: Therefore, the assessment of this large transfer should not remain at the level of on-chain address screenshots but should be combined with trading volume, fund inflows and outflows, and changes in position structure for a comprehensive judgment. While the large movements of a single address are certainly worth tracking, neglecting the funding dynamics of other sectors and the macro liquidity background can easily amplify noise in decision-making and overlook the main line.

Viewing Pendle's Long-Term Token Game Through a Large Transfer

● Defining the Nature of the Event: Based on the existing information, this transfer of 1.8 million PENDLE to Bybit is more clearly presented as a "concentration flow change of long-term linear unlocking tokens," rather than an actual selling behavior confirmed by on-chain data or official information. Currently, there is still a lack of a complete evidence chain regarding subsequent transactions and position changes, and directly defining it as a "massive dump" is not rigorous; judgment should be restrained until more data is disclosed.

● Key Indicators for Subsequent Tracking: The objective data worth closely observing next includes: first, whether this address has further large on-chain movements or transfers to other exchanges or new addresses; second, the order structure, transaction details, and funding rates of the PENDLE trading pair on Bybit, to see if there is a matching increase in transaction volume; third, the TVL trends and overall transaction volume evolution of the Pendle protocol, to determine whether this token flow is synchronized with the protocol's usage heat or yield environment.

● Data-Driven Observation Samples: Under conditions of incomplete information and unverifiable motives, a more prudent strategy is to adhere to data-driven decision-making, viewing this large transfer as a sample point for observing long-term token games and project maturity, rather than as evidence of a predetermined direction. It reminds the market that unlocking design, holding structures, and liquidity environments are always intertwined and evolving over time. What truly deserves attention is the patterns of multiple similar events in long-term statistics, rather than the emotional amplification of a single fluctuation.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。