In the time zone of UTC+8 this week, Coinbase announced the establishment of a "Quantum Computing and Blockchain Advisory Committee", attempting to build a forward-looking security line between quantum computing and the world of cryptocurrency. This independent advisory body is tasked with three core responsibilities: assessing the systemic impact of quantum computing on the blockchain ecosystem, publishing quantum risk assessments and defense recommendations, and providing technical path references for developers and institutions. The real contradiction behind this is: once quantum computers break through the critical point in computing power, the mainstream cryptographic algorithms supporting public chains like Bitcoin may be directly compromised. More symbolically, this is the first quantum security special team led by a mainstream exchange, indicating that quantum security has officially been dragged into the agenda of frontline infrastructure operators from the realms of academic discussion and standard formulation.
Quantum Shadows Approaching: The Blockchain Cryptographic Defense Line is Being Reassessed
● Theoretical Threat Path: From a cryptographic perspective, quantum computers are considered the "ultimate threat" because they are expected to solve problems like integer factorization and discrete logarithms, which are nearly impossible for traditional computers, in polynomial time using quantum algorithms such as Shor's algorithm. These two types of problems are precisely the security cornerstones of current mainstream asymmetric encryption (such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography). Once quantum computing power reaches a certain scale, the "one-way difficulty" property of existing public key systems will be shattered, allowing attackers to derive private keys from public keys in a feasible time frame.
● Quantum Vulnerability of Bitcoin: The ECDSA elliptic curve digital signature algorithm used by Bitcoin is exposed to this risk. In a classical environment, the computational cost of deriving a private key from a known public key is nearly prohibitive, but under sufficiently powerful quantum devices, this problem can theoretically be significantly accelerated. If an attacker can derive a private key from the public key addresses exposed on the blockchain, they could directly steal funds, alter transaction history, and even, in extreme cases, pose a chain reaction threat to consensus security. This means that the "security myth" of Bitcoin is not unshakeable but is tied to the same timeline as quantum advancements.
● Global Standard Race: As early as 2022, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) officially launched a post-quantum cryptography standardization project, screening, validating, and promoting a batch of next-generation cryptographic algorithms that are resistant to quantum attacks into the standard system. The signal released by this process is clear: the quantum impact is not a science fiction topic but a real risk incorporated into the medium- to long-term planning of national security agencies, which will reshape the global security landscape, including government communications, financial clearing, and public chain security.
● Time Race Narrative: On one side is the exponential promotional pace of quantum hardware advancements each year, and on the other is the slow but necessary rigorous advancement of cryptographic system upgrades. Quantum researchers only need to find one truly usable "computational breakthrough," while the cryptography and blockchain world must complete complex projects such as protocol upgrades, address migrations, and ecological collaborations in advance. The cruelty of this confrontation lies in the fact that once the quantum side gains the upper hand in time, the consequences will be "bloodshed first, then talk of repairs," which is also the fundamental motivation for Coinbase to attempt to shift quantum security from passive defense to proactive planning.
Exchanges Step to the Fore: Why Coinbase Takes Action
● Innovative Move: Coinbase has established an independent Quantum Computing and Blockchain Advisory Committee, rather than an internal research group or temporary workshop. From publicly available information, this committee has been assigned medium- to long-term tasks to conduct systematic assessments around quantum risks, post-quantum solutions, and specific public chain ecosystems (especially Bitcoin). This setup allows Coinbase to be the first in the industry to complete the leap from "concern about quantum topics" to "building a systematic framework for quantum security," demonstrating clear innovation and exemplary significance among mainstream exchanges.
● Transformation of Infrastructure Role: As a custody and trading hub, exchanges manage a large number of high-value asset key management and signing processes. On the issue of quantum security, they have often remained at a passive response level—waiting for public chains to complete protocol upgrades before adjusting their own systems. Coinbase's actions indicate that leading infrastructure operators are beginning to see themselves as "design participants" in the transformation of quantum security, actively engaging in risk assessments, solution discussions, and route negotiations, rather than merely being downstream executors.
● Signaling to Institutions and Developers: For compliant institutional funds, quantum security represents a "long tail but extreme" black swan risk that, if realized, will directly impact asset security and custody responsibilities. By leading the establishment of the advisory committee and publicly disclosing its tasks and timelines, Coinbase is essentially providing institutions with a traceable "quantum risk governance route." For the developer community, this means that potential changes regarding address formats, signing schemes, and wallet interfaces in the coming years will be accompanied by clearer assessments and guidance, thus generating a certain trust premium.
● Comparison to Traditional Financial Pace: Traditional financial infrastructure often follows regulatory guidance and industry standards when facing cryptographic upgrades and security architecture adjustments, typically initiating implementation after decisions are made by upstream institutions such as central banks and clearinghouses. In contrast, Coinbase, as a crypto-native platform, can conduct preliminary research and route mapping around quantum risks even before standards are fully established. This first-mover advantage comes from both a faster pace of technological iteration and its dual role in regulatory compliance and market operation.
Six Experts on Stage: From Academic Frontiers to Bitcoin Defense Lines
● Single Source Expert Lineup: According to public reports (single source), the Coinbase Quantum Advisory Committee currently consists of 6 top experts including Scott Aaronson and Dan Boneh, covering key areas such as quantum computing theory, modern cryptography, and system security. Although details have not been fully disclosed, this lineup is already sufficient to indicate that Coinbase aims to bring academic frontiers into the practical scenarios of Bitcoin and public chain security, rather than remaining at an engineering perspective of self-talk within the industry.
● Research Directions and Connections to Blockchain Security: Scott Aaronson has long focused on quantum computing complexity theory, possessing profound judgments on the boundaries of quantum algorithm capabilities and their practical feasibility; Dan Boneh is an important figure in modern cryptography and applied cryptography, with a long-standing focus on public key systems, signing schemes, and security protocol design. The intersection of these research directions with blockchain security lies in their ability to assess the extent to which quantum algorithms pose actual threats to current cryptographic assumptions and to provide theoretical support for how to construct more secure and deployable post-quantum signatures and protocols.
● Research Focus Outlined in Public Statements: According to reports from Foresight News, the committee will focus on Bitcoin address transformation and post-quantum signing schemes. This means that their work will not merely linger at the abstract level of "quantum will come," but will target Bitcoin, the largest public chain with the most concentrated existing assets, considering the specific migration paths at the address layer, signing layer, and protocol layer, as well as how these changes can be implemented without triggering systemic risks.
● Boundaries of the Advisory Role: It is important to emphasize that this committee is positioned as an evaluation and recommendation body, rather than a direct development team. They will not personally implement specific on-chain code or product realizations but will influence Coinbase's internal decision-making and the technical choices of the broader ecosystem through risk assessments, route comparisons, and recommendation reports. Therefore, the external parties should exercise restraint regarding the technical routes and timelines, avoiding speculation beyond the existing information about "what solutions will be launched and when the mainnet will go live."
From Bitcoin Addresses to Post-Quantum Signatures: Upgrades are a Systemic Project
● Multiple Dimensions of Address Transformation: The quantum security transformation around Bitcoin addresses is not simply a matter of replacing a set of encoding rules. First, in the existing model, some addresses do not expose public keys before their first spending, and quantum threats mainly focus on old addresses with exposed public keys; second, how to migrate a large number of historical addresses and long-dormant funds is a challenge that involves technology, governance, and user education; third, any change in address format will directly impact user experience, wallet compatibility, and toolchain ecology, making it necessary to repeatedly weigh security against usability during the upgrade.
● Impact Points of Post-Quantum Signatures: Introducing post-quantum signing schemes will reshape the public chain ecosystem on multiple levels. In terms of security, new algorithms need to counter quantum attacks while avoiding introducing new implementation risks; in terms of performance, metrics such as signature size and verification speed may differ significantly, directly affecting block capacity, transaction throughput, and node load; in terms of cost, larger signatures and more complex verifications will increase on-chain storage and computing costs, putting pressure on fee models and node operation thresholds. All these factors need to be included in a systemic assessment, rather than approached solely from the "more secure" perspective.
● Multi-Role Collaboration and Potential Divergences: Quantum security upgrades are not just discussions among developers and scholars; they also involve the interests of exchanges, wallet service providers, miners, and various on-chain applications. Exchanges and custodians are concerned about asset security and compliance responsibilities during the migration process; wallet teams focus on interface modifications and user education costs; miners care about the impact of new solutions on block structure and verification costs; application developers need to assess whether contract logic and user processes need to be restructured. Different roles have varying tolerances for risk, cost, and timelines, and the coordination process will inevitably involve divergences and compromises.
● How Risk Assessment Influences Decision-Making: According to Coinbase's setup, the committee will publish quantum risk assessments and defense recommendations, which are expected to become important reference benchmarks for industry decision-making in the future. For example, if a certain post-quantum signing scheme is assessed to achieve a better balance between quantum resistance and performance, exchanges and wallets may conduct technical preliminary research based on this; if the report determines that the risk of certain old addresses significantly increases within a specific time window, custodians and large holders may initiate phased migration plans. Assessments and recommendations will not directly replace governance voting and technical implementation but will significantly shape the risk awareness and action sequences of all parties involved.
Timelines and Uncertainties: Psychological and Technical Preparations Before 2027
● Time Anchor for the First Assessment Report: From publicly available information, the first quantum risk assessment document from the Coinbase Quantum Advisory Committee is expected to be released in early 2027. This time point is not a "predictive node" for quantum breakthroughs but rather a milestone indicating the institutionalization and documentation of quantum security issues: it means that in the next two to three years, the committee will systematically sort out quantum advancements, the attack surfaces of Bitcoin and mainstream public chains, as well as potential technical options and migration challenges.
● Early Layout Amid Uncertainty: When quantum computing will reach a level sufficient to threaten public chains like Bitcoin remains highly uncertain, with significant differences in the time expectations provided by various parties. In this context, the industry's choice to lay out several years in advance does not assume a certain "quantum explosion point," but is based on risk management thinking: once a real breakthrough occurs, the window for protocol upgrades, address migrations, and ecological coordination may be very short. The earlier a framework for assessment and candidate paths is constructed, the more likely it is to avoid passive responses at critical moments.
● Regulatory and Institutional Strategy Adjustments: For regulators, quantum risk assessment reports from institutions like Coinbase will provide important references for formulating technology-neutral regulatory frameworks—such as how to view custodians' risk disclosure obligations under quantum threats and how to assess the quantum preparedness of different infrastructures. Institutional investors can adjust their asset allocations and technical strategies accordingly, for example, by comparing the "quantum protection levels" of different custodians or incorporating quantum risk premiums into investment decisions.
● Maintain Restraint in Predictions: At the current stage, any specific timing judgment regarding "when quantum computing will truly break Bitcoin or mainstream public chains" carries a high degree of uncertainty and controversy. It is impossible to derive a strict timeline based on existing public data, nor is it advisable to extrapolate a global turning point from a single experimental advancement. Therefore, both the Coinbase Advisory Committee and the broader academic and industrial community tend to prefer restraint in time expectations, focusing their energy on actionable defense preparations and route research rather than attempting to provide the market with a seemingly precise "quantum countdown number."
Quantum Countdown Begins: Who Will Safeguard the Foundations of the Crypto World
● Convergence of Three Forces: The structural threat posed by quantum computing, Coinbase's proactive layout, and the post-quantum cryptography standardization process promoted by NIST since 2022 are forming an interwoven triangular pattern. Academic and standard institutions are defining the technical boundaries of future cryptography, while infrastructure operators such as exchanges are attempting to translate these boundaries into specific risk management and upgrade paths. Meanwhile, the public chain community and developers need to find implementable governance and technical compromises between the two.
● "Pulling Effect" of Leading Infrastructure: If leading infrastructures like Coinbase complete their quantum security upgrades first—whether in key management, signature support, or compatibility with new address standards—the entire crypto ecosystem is likely to be passively pushed forward. Wallets and applications will have to follow suit to maintain interoperability with mainstream trading channels; miners and node operators will also need to accept corresponding protocol evolutions to participate in mainstream economic activities. Quantum security will gradually evolve from individual technical options to a foundational capability threshold where "falling behind means being marginalized."
● From Academic Issues to Infrastructure Battleground: In the coming years, quantum security is likely to transition from the "academic conferences and standard drafts" phase to the infrastructure battleground of "mainnet parameters, address formats, and signature schemes." Different public chains, custodians, and wallet camps will engage in multiple rounds of games around security, performance, and user experience, potentially leading to a transitional pattern of "multiple post-quantum schemes coexisting." In this long-term game, those who can provide the most feasible migration paths and ecological collaboration plans without sacrificing security will have a better chance of occupying a high ground in the next phase of the crypto infrastructure landscape.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
