On January 22, 2026, at 8:00 AM UTC+8, the wallet address 0x129c…21d7 associated with Mirana Ventures made its first transfer to an exchange in years, concentrating 13,650,000 MNT. According to multiple media outlets, this amount is approximately $12.2 million at the price on that day. This substantial amount of tokens flowing from a long-term holding address to the Bybit exchange indicates that a portion of the previously "static" MNT supply has been activated, which could theoretically alter the short-term supply-demand structure. Although on-chain activity does not directly equate to selling, large institutional deposits often amplify market expectations and emotional fluctuations, causing investors to oscillate between "potential selling pressure" and "structural reallocation," making short-term prices and risk premiums highly sensitive.
The Turning Point of a Wallet's Sudden Activity After Three Years of Silence
● Address Profile: On-chain data shows that the address 0x129c…21d7 has been marked by multiple analytical institutions as being highly associated with Mirana Ventures. According to sources like Rhythm, this consensus is not from a single source but rather the result of cross-referencing multiple data sources. Although the parties involved have not released an official confirmation, a market consensus around the "Mirana associated wallet" has gradually formed among research institutions, market media, and data platforms, providing a framework for interpreting this event.
● Holding Behavior Characteristics: According to Planet Daily, this is the first significant transfer to an exchange for this address after holding MNT for about three years. Prior to this, the address was more inclined towards long-term static holding and internal on-chain circulation, with no significant concentration of transfers to exchanges. This means that the deposit of 13.65 million MNT to Bybit represents a notable "behavioral breakpoint" in the historical trajectory of this address, altering its usual low-frequency operational rhythm and significantly increasing market attention on its subsequent actions.
● Historical Scale Positioning: In terms of a single transaction volume, 13,650,000 MNT corresponds to about $12.2 million, which is not extremely exaggerated compared to the general funding levels of past projects that Mirana has participated in. However, given the current market size and liquidity environment of MNT, it is sufficient to be considered an "important event-level" movement of tokens that could influence market expectations. In other words, this is not the largest financial action within the Mirana ecosystem, but it is a significant structural signal in the context of MNT.
Possible Price Impact Paths of 13.65 Million MNT Entry
● Theoretical Selling Pressure Calculation: Based on the current price range of MNT and the average daily trading volume on mainstream platforms, if $12.2 million worth of tokens were to be concentrated and sold at market price in the short term, it would theoretically far exceed the typical absorption capacity of natural daily transactions, likely amplifying downward price volatility. If released in batches according to a certain proportion of daily trading volume, the immediate price impact would be diluted, but in price ranges with thin order book structures, significant downward slippage and short-term "liquidation" effects could still occur.
● Volatility and Depth Constraints: Considering the recent operational characteristics of MNT, price volatility is in a relatively active range, while the depth of buy and sell orders at certain levels is not substantial, making it likely for large market orders to penetrate multiple layers of orders. From the perspectives of on-chain and order book data, the short-term market absorption capacity is limited, and if large-volume tokens lack a refined execution strategy, it will significantly amplify slippage, impacting both long and short positions in the short term.
● Different Handling Methods: It is important to emphasize that entering an exchange does not necessarily equate to a "market dump." If handled through on-chain hedging, batch orders, or market-making pairs, the price impact can be partially hedged or extended; if the token transfer is achieved through off-chain negotiations, OTC swaps, or structured products, the impact on the public order book would be more moderate or even difficult to detect. Different rhythms and execution paths will present distinctly different price and depth trajectories on the market.
Exchange-side Liquidity Supplement and Market Emotion Amplification
● Bybit Liquidity Considerations: From the exchange's perspective, the recent trading and holding changes of MNT-related spot and contracts are key dimensions to determine whether there is a "liquidity supplement demand." If the depth of MNT on Bybit was previously relatively limited, or if the contract holdings/leverage ratios were skewed high, large token deposits could be interpreted by the market as potential liquidity supply and hedging resource supplementation. However, current public data does not provide a clear conclusion, and whether liquidity is supplemented still needs to be verified in conjunction with subsequent trading and holding curve changes.
● Emotion and Narrative Amplifier: For retail investors and social media, the combination of "Mirana associated address + over $10 million + exchange deposit" is a narrative that can easily be amplified, often simplified to emotional tags like "whales are fleeing" or "institutional dumping signals." This narrative often precedes the facts themselves, causing short-term emotional fluctuations to far exceed objective on-chain changes, requiring investors to consciously distinguish between emotional noise and structural information.
● On-chain Visible and Invisible: From an on-chain perspective, it can be confirmed that the position of the tokens has changed, flowing from long-term holding addresses to exchange addresses, but specific motives and subsequent paths cannot be directly inferred. Simply equating "transferring to an exchange" with "liquidation" or "inevitable selling" exceeds the explanatory power of the data itself and can mislead market judgments at the narrative level.
Multi-source Data Cross-validation to Avoid Over-interpretation
● Information Source Spectrum: The core data and narrative of this event mainly come from cross-verification across multiple channels, including Foresight, Golden Finance, Planet Daily, and Rhythm. Among them, Foresight and Golden Finance focus more on the scale of the amount and the timing of the news release, while Planet Daily emphasizes the time dimension of "the first large transfer to an exchange after about three years of holding," and Rhythm provides evidence of Mirana's association from an on-chain attribution perspective. Multi-source information collectively forms the current available factual framework.
● Key Unknowns Maintain Restraint: As of now, the remaining MNT holdings of this wallet, the overall asset allocation structure, and the official stance of Mirana Ventures have not been disclosed. Any judgments about "whether to reduce holdings" or "whether it is still a core heavy position" will fall into a high uncertainty speculation range. In the absence of a complete on-chain view and official explanations, analysis should maintain conservative expressions, avoiding filling data gaps with assumptions.
● Unverified Associations Should Not Be Concluded: There are voices in the market attempting to directly link this deposit with Bybit's Mantle-related activities or specific operational arrangements, but the relevant associations are currently marked as "pending verification." Before obtaining further confirmation from the exchange, project parties, or authoritative data sources, using it as a conclusive basis poses obvious risks. A more prudent approach is to treat it as a hypothesis rather than a consensus, avoiding exaggeration of uncertain links in public narratives.
From a Single Whale Transfer to Mid-term MNT Structural Observation
● Short-term Liquidity and Risk Premium: Based on existing data, the transfer of 13,650,000 MNT associated with Mirana to Bybit has the most direct impact on the potential increase in short-term tradable tokens and the re-pricing of market expectations for selling pressure. In a high-volatility and limited depth environment, there is a tendency for risk premiums to rise, making short-term traders more sensitive to order book fluctuations, funding rates, and basis structures.
● Trader's Quantitative Observation Checklist: For market participants, a more pragmatic response is to closely monitor a set of quantifiable indicators, including: 1) Changes in buy and sell order depth and spreads for MNT on mainstream exchanges, whether there are significant "upward/downward selling/buying walls"; 2) Funding rates and long/short positions in contracts, observing whether sentiment is skewed towards one extreme; 3) On-chain holding concentration and the flow of large address tokens, determining whether more institutional addresses are following the movement; 4) Actual trading volume and large transaction counts on Bybit, verifying whether the deposit has already partially materialized into trading behavior.
● Information Fragments Rather Than Final Signals: At this stage, a large transfer from a Mirana associated wallet is undoubtedly an important piece of the puzzle for understanding the mid-term structure of MNT, but it is far from constituting a "final signal." The lack of public information regarding the complete holdings of this wallet, Mirana's official strategy framework, and potential inter-institutional trading arrangements means that the market can only view it as an important but limited structural event. A rational approach is to acknowledge its impact on sentiment and liquidity while avoiding drawing overly definitive bullish or bearish conclusions from a single on-chain action.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
