The issue with ETH has never been TPS, but rather who holds the validation power | The true meaning of native DVT!

CM @cmdefi's discussion here is simply agreeable!

Vitalik's promotion of native DVT clearly aims to reshape the staking power structure of Ethereum.

1️⃣ The current ETH staking is no longer very "Ethereum spirit": single node + high threshold → funds are forced to concentrate in a few operators, such as Lido or some CEXs. This is not decentralization; it is a structural compromise.

2️⃣ What Vitalik wants to do is reduce the protocol's dependence on "soft governance centers" like Lido/exchanges, which is a political security issue.

3️⃣ For DVT protocols like SSV: in the short term, it is a negative, but in the long term, it is a positive.

Native DVT only provides "basic configuration"; what can truly charge fees and accumulate value remains the Operator market, reputation system, and compliance customization.

Just like the system has built-in Office, professional users will still use stronger tools.

4️⃣ So the conclusion is simple: in the long term, whether ETH can win does not depend on TPS, but on whether the distribution of power can remain consistent over time. Native DVT is a price that a network must pay to survive longer.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。