Beijing Time, January 21, 2026, global asset prices are being repriced amid the sharp decline in stock markets and the new highs in precious metals, with a clear cooling of risk appetite. All three major U.S. stock indices fell sharply, contrasting strongly with the continuous rise of gold and silver, as funds swung violently between risk aversion and speculation. Alongside macro volatility, both the U.S. and Hong Kong are ramping up crypto regulation—one focusing on upgrading rules, the other announcing the completion of preliminary regulatory infrastructure, setting a new compliance tone for the industry. Under the pressure of regulation and market turbulence, the extreme leverage operations of whale traders, the long-term heavy positions of leading institutions in Ethereum, and the intensive innovations in token economics and yield structures of DeFi protocols create a complex picture of "accelerated regulation and industry self-rescue."
U.S. Stock Market Crash and New Highs in Gold and Silver: A Sudden Halt in Risk Appetite and the Identity Crisis of Crypto Assets
On January 21, the three major U.S. stock indices suffered significant losses, further lowering the overall pricing of risk assets, with growth and cyclical stocks under pressure, reflecting systemic concerns about future economic and profit expectations. In contrast to the overall decline in the stock market, a few high-growth sectors, represented by chips, remain firmly supported by funds, with some chip stocks hitting new highs against the trend, indicating that, amid a cooling risk appetite, the market is not retreating entirely but is concentrating bets on a few sectors with higher certainty and clearer growth logic. Meanwhile, gold and silver prices reached new highs, as traditional safe-haven assets continue to attract incremental funds in an environment interwoven with geopolitical, economic outlook, and policy uncertainties, highlighting the rising sentiment of "returning to safety margins." In the tug-of-war between the stock market facing selling pressure and precious metals reaching new highs, crypto assets are still seen as high-beta risk assets, passively following global risk appetite fluctuations, while some funds view them as digital forms of risk-hedging tools, facing a harsher reality test of their dual identity as "risk assets" and "digital hedges" in the current macro environment.
U.S. and Hong Kong Race Ahead: Regulatory Upgrades Shape New Compliance Coordinates
On the same day that market volatility intensified, the U.S. and Hong Kong pushed forward their crypto regulatory frameworks from different directions. In the U.S., the CFTC chairman launched the "Future-Proof" plan, aiming to build a regulatory framework that can evolve rapidly with technological advancements, avoiding systemic risks brought by regulatory lag behind innovation by upgrading crypto asset-related rules in advance. This statement did not provide specific details but clearly conveyed the regulatory body's desire to find a new balance between regulation and innovation, rather than simply blocking technological development with a "one-size-fits-all" approach. In Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Professional Association publicly stated that Hong Kong has completed its preliminary regulatory infrastructure for virtual assets, and the next focus should shift to commercial application implementation, transitioning from "building a regulatory framework" to "guiding business scenarios," opening clearer paths for licensed institutions and compliant projects. This has formed a regulatory model that combines the U.S. emphasis on rule upgrades and risk control with Hong Kong's focus on institutional completeness and application implementation, providing different compliance path options for the global crypto market while objectively intensifying the game of regulatory arbitrage between capital and projects across different jurisdictions. As current policies remain at the stage of public speeches and framework declarations, lacking specifics, one can only judge based on disclosed information: whether it is "future-proof" or "regulatory infrastructure completed," the overall tone leans more towards bringing crypto assets into a visible and controllable regulatory track, rather than completely suppressing the existence space of this asset class through extreme measures.
Whale High-Leverage Shorting and Massive Long Positions in Ethereum: A Tug-of-War of Directional Bets
Under the dual disturbances of macro and regulation, the divergence of different funds regarding future price paths has been amplified to the extreme. A whale trader, through a rolling short strategy, magnified an initial capital of about $3 million to a notional size of $18.5 million, becoming a typical case of extreme leveraged returns in the current market. This operation, which involves continuously increasing short positions and profiting from rolling with market fluctuations, has temporarily placed him at the center of the storm in the current pullback environment. However, more strikingly, this trader currently holds about $304 million in short positions, and if the market experiences an unexpected rebound, his directional error will trigger significant liquidation risks, potentially causing a chain reaction of forced liquidations. In stark contrast, institutional asset manager Trend Research holds approximately $1.91 billion in Ethereum, representing a long-term bullish bet that is completely opposite to the whale's short position, reflecting the institution's strong belief in and patient layout for Ethereum's mid-to-long-term value. The whale bets on a short-term decline with high leverage, while institutions lock in mid-to-long-term upward expectations with real capital, creating a highly sharp directional bet on the same timeline, pushing the volatility range of the crypto market into greater extremes of uncertainty in the coming months.
Central Bank Easing and On-Chain Innovation: Rapid Switching of Funds Among Various Assets
On the macro level, the People's Bank of China conducted a 7-day reverse repurchase operation of 363.5 billion yuan on January 21, maintaining the winning bid rate at 1.40%, signaling a clear message of marginal liquidity easing. The combination of low interest rates and short-term liquidity injections is favorable for raising the overall valuation center of risk assets from a global perspective, providing a more relaxed funding environment for the stock market, credit assets, and even crypto assets. However, the transmission of this policy pulse to the crypto market is not linear and often requires filtering and repricing through multiple layers of the banking system, real economy, and traditional capital markets. The current macro environment presents a contradictory combination of "moderate easing + high uncertainty." On one hand, easing policies help improve the willingness of funds to bear risks; on the other hand, the unclear economic and regulatory outlook keeps funds frequently switching and dynamically rebalancing between the stock market, precious metals, and crypto assets. In the context of gradually easing traditional monetary conditions, the valuation logic of crypto assets is beginning to be re-examined: as a high-elasticity high-beta asset, it is expected to gain greater price increases when risk appetite warms; as a digital asset with supply mechanism constraints and on-chain transparency, its potential risk-hedging narrative is also being implicitly compared with traditional safe assets like gold and silver. This "dual attribute" repricing will continue to be rewritten by market participants amid the overlap of macro easing and severe market volatility.
From HyperLend to Pendle: DeFi Moves Towards Complex Yield Engineering Under Pressure
Under the dual pressures of tightening regulation and market turbulence, DeFi projects are investing more energy into the deep reconstruction of token economics and yield structures to retain limited existing liquidity. HyperLend's announced HPL token economics model attempts to find a new balance between the price discovery function of on-chain interest rate markets and the protocol's own value capture, through more refined incentive designs that allow participants to simultaneously bear risks and enjoy returns in lending and market-making activities, avoiding the continuous dilution of protocol value caused by the early "high inflation, high selling pressure" model. On the other hand, Pendle's launched sPENDLE liquid staking token further enhances the existing yield splitting mechanism, attempting to allow users to retain asset liquidity while stacking staking yields, to meet the increasingly refined and strategic needs of DeFi users. Whether it is HyperLend's token economic model or Pendle's re-sculpting of yield curves through liquid staking, they essentially represent different answers from project teams to the core question of "how to retain real demand and long-term liquidity without amplifying interest rate risks" amid strengthened regulation and a retreat in market risk appetite. Without touching the undisclosed roadmap red lines, these public designs sufficiently reflect that DeFi has evolved from the early single-dimensional "mining is justice" to a complex yield engineering stage centered around time value, liquidity premiums, and risk layering.
Accelerated Regulatory Implementation and Product Rush: Rebuilding New Order Amidst Turbulence
In summary, macro volatility and accelerated regulation are exerting combined pressure, causing crypto assets to face dual challenges of valuation contraction and compliance reshaping: on one side, the sharp decline in U.S. stocks and the strengthening of safe-haven assets suppress the overall risk premium; on the other side, the institutional environment reshaping brought by the U.S. "Future-Proof" plan and the completion of Hong Kong's regulatory infrastructure. Correspondingly, the market presents a rare phenomenon of institutional long positions coexisting with whale short-term gambling, with $1.91 billion level long Ethereum positions facing off against $304 million high-leverage short positions on-chain, indicating that the market is preemptively arranging directional positions for the next trend rather than simply waiting for the market to evolve naturally. If the regulatory practices in the U.S. and Hong Kong can ultimately solidify into a predictable rule framework, it is expected to provide clearer interfaces for compliant capital entry and innovative product development, making the boundaries between "regulatory red lines" and "innovation space" relatively stable and visible. As predictable policies have not yet fully landed, while the product side continues to accelerate iteration represented by HyperLend's token economics and Pendle's liquid staking, the short-term volatility of the crypto market is likely to remain high. However, from a longer-term perspective, the industry is reconstructing order along the path of "compliance + refined yields": the compliance framework will filter out participants better suited to long-term rules, while complex yield engineering will continue to provide richer asset pricing and allocation tools for the survivors under visible risks.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
