In the Eastern Eight Time Zone this week, two main lines surrounding Ethereum are accelerating their differentiation: on one end, ETH whales represented by Bitmine are engaging in high-leverage speculation in both spot and derivatives markets, while on the other end, WalletConnect is partnering with Ingenico to promote the infrastructure construction for POS terminal crypto payments. The former amplifies market volatility through concentrated holdings and leverage of 10 to 40 times, while the latter aims to integrate WalletConnect Pay into European offline terminals before Q1 2026, creating a closed-loop transaction between on-chain assets and physical commerce. Speculative enthusiasm is continuously heightened by leverage and concentration, while the actual implementation of payment scenarios remains in the planning and testing stages. This misalignment in narrative and rhythm is becoming one of the core structural contradictions in the current ETH market.
Concentrated Holdings Amplify Price Center Fluctuations
● Capital Concentration: According to briefing data, Bitmine holds approximately 3.372% of ETH circulation, forming a highly concentrated single entity exposure in the spot market. This scale means that its actions of increasing or decreasing positions have significant price influence, far exceeding the marginal adjustments of typical institutions and long-term holders.
● Systemic Amplifier: In a high concentration context, when the market's macro expectations or Bitcoin direction are unclear, the unilateral operations of whales are more likely to push the overall ETH price center up or down, rather than just creating short-term noise. Once directional errors or liquidity tightening occur, concentrated holdings can amplify individual risks into systemic volatility, resulting in longer liquidation chains and larger impact radii.
● Derivatives Hedge Gap: The briefing indicates that recent ETH options Gamma risk exposure is in a declining state, reflecting a cautious willingness among institutions to sell protective options and hedge against large-scale volatility. While spot whales like Bitmine continue to hold high concentrations, the weakening Gamma protection on the options side makes it more likely that market makers and institutions will passively adjust Delta in response to rapid unilateral movements in spot prices, further increasing price elasticity and exacerbating upward or downward amplitudes.
10 to 40 Times Leverage Speculation Raises Volatility
● Leverage Usage Overview: The research briefing mentions that ETH whales are generally believed to use 10 to 40 times high leverage in the derivatives market, but the statistical representativeness of this qualitative judgment is specifically noted as questionable and can only be seen as a trend description. This means that some large addresses are taking on nominal risk exposures far exceeding their spot holdings in perpetual contracts and futures, amplifying the short-term impact on prices.
● Typical Short Case: According to the briefing, a whale account established a 6,755 ETH short position in ETH derivatives, recording approximately $241,000 in profit. This scale of profit is backed by precise timing of short-term price rhythms, which also means that during price declines, proactive position increases or passive margin increases will amplify market momentum, accelerating downward movements within the wave.
● Typical Long Case: Another whale held 5,000 ETH long positions for 65 days, earning approximately $581,000 (this data source is noted as pending verification and can only serve as a representative case reference). From a time dimension perspective, these medium to short-term high-leverage long positions are often tied to macro narratives or sector rotations, and once the market reverses, the passive liquidation pressure will also be concentrated and released in a short time.
● Resonance of Leverage and Gamma: Under the dual effects of widespread high leverage usage and declining options Gamma exposure, ETH prices have become significantly more sensitive to marginal capital and emotional changes. The margin management of both long and short sides will directly translate into strong liquidation actions on-chain, while weakened Gamma protection makes it difficult for hedging positions to absorb shocks in a timely manner, ultimately resulting in increased short-term volatility and a higher frequency of momentary "tug-of-war."
Weak Bitcoin Support Triggers Cross-Asset Linkage
● Historical Linkage Characteristics: From past cycles, ETH and BTC have shown a high degree of co-movement in major trends, with correlation often rising during extreme market conditions. Whether it is the resonance lift during the bull market peak or the collective retreat during liquidity tightening, ETH tends to follow Bitcoin's direction, amplifying BTC's rhythm in terms of volatility, rather than independently moving in a completely opposite major trend.
● Current Support Risks: The research briefing points out that the $88,000 to $90,000 range for BTC support is relatively weak. Within this critical range, if Bitcoin experiences a significant drop or fails multiple retests, the market will quickly reassess the risk premium for overall crypto assets. For whales already using 10 to 40 times leverage on ETH, a downward breakout in Bitcoin will trigger concentrated pressure on ETH contract margins through correlation transmission.
● Chain Liquidation Chain: With entities like Bitmine holding approximately 3.372% of ETH circulation in a highly concentrated pattern, if BTC support is lost, ETH prices may quickly retrace in correlation and emotional resonance, with leveraged longs facing insufficient margins and forced liquidations first. Forced liquidations will further push down prices, triggering the next round of margin calls and additions, forming a typical chain liquidation scenario. Meanwhile, some inadequately hedged institutions and market makers are forced to chase prices and adjust positions in an environment of declining Gamma exposure, further self-reinforcing volatility, transforming cross-asset linkage from "synchronous decline" into structural stampedes.
Payment Interface Expansion and POS Implementation Path
● Cooperation Framework: In stark contrast to high-leverage speculation, WalletConnect is collaborating with payment terminal giant Ingenico to integrate on-chain asset payment capabilities into offline POS terminals. According to the basic framework disclosed in the briefing, WalletConnect is responsible for providing wallet connection and payment routing capabilities, while Ingenico integrates this crypto payment module into its existing POS devices and acquiring network, achieving a seamless upgrade for merchants.
● Implementation Timeline: According to the research briefing, WalletConnect Pay is scheduled to officially launch on the European POS network in Q1 2026. This means that over the next two years, development and compliance teams need to complete a full set of processes from technical integration, clearing and settlement design to regulatory connections, allowing terminal merchants to truly accept on-chain asset payments and smoothly connect with the fiat currency system.
● Consensus on Interface Significance: Market views generally agree that "integrating stablecoin payments into POS terminals is a key interface between Web3 and traditional commerce." When offline retail, service industries, and even cross-border scenarios can directly accept on-chain assets through POS, crypto payments will transition from niche online circles to mainstream daily consumption, and the settlement layer attributes of public chains like Ethereum will be validated in real transactions, complementing the current on-chain activities dominated by trading and speculation.
From Hackathons to the Prototype of the POS Payment Network
At the infrastructure construction level, the Ethereum developer ecosystem is building the foundational blocks for the future payment network through hackathons and middleware projects. In the recent x402 hackathon, several projects, including Superfluid, focused on payment infrastructure, iterating technical solutions around streaming payments, smart contract automatic settlements, and on-chain salary disbursements. Although these capabilities are still some distance from large-scale commercial use, they have already established prototypes in key dimensions such as programmable cash flow and real-time settlement, reserving interface space for subsequent integration with wallet and terminal manufacturers.
If we view the collaboration between WalletConnect Pay and Ingenico as a breakthrough in offline acquiring, then the developer ecosystem is providing programmable funding and logic layer support for it. Through the connection of wallets, payment routing, streaming settlement, and POS terminals, a nascent Ethereum payment network is gradually taking shape: at the front end, users can scan or click on the POS as simply as swiping a card, while behind the scenes, there is an automated process of contract calls, on-chain settlements, and fund aggregation. However, this "bottom-up" technical route is clearly misaligned with the "top-down" rhythm of the secondary market—while hackathon projects and infrastructure upgrades are still refining stability and compliance paths, the secondary market has already overdrawn expectations for the "payment narrative" in high leverage and whale speculation, continuously widening the gap between price and application.
When Will Speculation and Application Narratives Align?
In summary, Ethereum is presenting a dual-line structure of "high-leverage upper speculation and slow lower payment implementation." On one hand, entities like Bitmine hold approximately 3.372% of ETH circulation, combined with whale groups using 10 to 40 times leverage in the derivatives market, causing the ETH price center to be pushed higher in volatility through rounds of chip speculation, with short-term fluctuations increasingly reliant on the risk preferences and margin management of a few large accounts. On the other hand, the collaboration between WalletConnect Pay and Ingenico's POS, along with payment infrastructure projects in the x402 hackathon, are still in the transition phase from technical validation to commercial deployment, with a time lag before changing mainstream user payment habits.
In this context, the vulnerability of Bitcoin's $88,000 to $90,000 support and the high concentration and high leverage positions in ETH constitute a potential dual impact on the short to medium-term price center. If BTC chooses a downward direction, chain liquidations may have an amplifying effect on ETH beyond fundamental changes, while the slow progress of payment implementation is unlikely to provide structural support for prices in the short term. Therefore, in the future observation of ETH, the pace of deleveraging and the progress of the European POS payment network will become two key threads that must be tracked simultaneously: the former determines when volatility and liquidation risks return to rational ranges, while the latter decides whether the payment narrative can rise from expectations to support real cash flow and merchant networks, ultimately facilitating the realignment of speculation and application narratives.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
