With the sharp decline in volatility, Bitcoin trading rules are being rewritten.

CN
17 hours ago

In the Eastern Eight Time Zone this week, as the implied volatility of Bitcoin and Ethereum has cumulatively decreased by about 18–25 volatility points, the price dynamics of the cryptocurrency market are undergoing substantial changes. The previously frequent large unilateral trends and intense tug-of-war have significantly reduced in the current environment, with the market exhibiting more narrow and repeated fluctuations. In this low-volatility framework, traditional directional strategies that rely on high leverage and chasing prices are beginning to face dual pressures of declining expected returns and worsening risk-reward ratios. In contrast, institutions and professional traders are systematically switching their strategies, preferring to adopt yield-generating strategies such as volatility arbitrage, selling call options, and low-leverage range trading, focusing on "earning time and volatility" to explore new profit sources during this "absence of trend" phase.

Market Signals of Rapidly Cooling Volatility

Decline in Implied Volatility: According to Matrixport data, the implied volatility of Bitcoin and Ethereum has recently decreased by about 18–25 volatility points, with expectations for future sharp fluctuations in option prices significantly revised downwards, reflecting a notable cooling in the market's pricing of large upward or downward movements.
Compression of Time Value: The decline in implied volatility directly compresses the "time value" component of options, making it difficult for option premiums to maintain previous high levels under the same remaining term, with bullish trends and sharp declines being generally viewed as having reduced probabilities in the short term.
Attraction of Unilateral Positions Decreases: In a low-volatility environment, the statistical expectation of unilateral directional positions is weakened, including both pure long or short positions in spot/futures and protective option combinations that incur high costs to guard against extreme volatility. Whether it is high-cost protection or trend strategies relying on breakouts, their cost-effectiveness is significantly lower than during phases of higher volatility.

Strategy Migration and the Rise of "Earning Volatility Money"

In the context of declining volatility and a dominant range-bound oscillation pattern, the practical focus of the market is quietly shifting. Matrixport has observed that traders are more inclined to obtain profits through volatility arbitrage within low-leverage, relatively narrow price ranges rather than betting on direction. This change is first reflected in the options market, where the chasing-up sentiment has significantly cooled, and the demand for deep out-of-the-money call options far from the current price has weakened; at the same time, the demand for downside hedging has not significantly increased, indicating that both bulls and bears are avoiding heavy bets on a single extreme scenario. Market behavior is gradually shifting from "waiting for a trend explosion" to "accepting oscillation as the norm," with more focus on how to monetize repeated price fluctuations and the passage of time, rather than relying on a single breakout to achieve annual profit targets. This has made intraday rolling, cross-term, and cross-asset volatility-related strategies the focus of mainstream capital.

Ethereum's "Spot + Premium" Passive Income Strategy

In the Ethereum market, the strategy switch in a low-volatility environment is particularly typical. Market observations show that some ETH investors, in the context of the infrequent occurrence of large unilateral price movements, are more inclined to increase their spot holdings while selling call options to earn premium income, constructing a "covered call" combination with yield-enhancing attributes. When implied volatility, although lower than before, still retains a certain level, and the underlying price primarily exhibits mild oscillations, such combinations can steadily convert the time value in options into relatively predictable cash flow. If the ETH price generally remains within a set range, investors retain exposure to the long-term upside potential of the spot while periodically collecting premiums to elevate overall holding yields, maximizing capital efficiency in the low-volatility phase by "earning time value while lying down."

Bitcoin's Gamma Structure Shift and Local Volatility Restructuring

The options structure of Bitcoin has also undergone noteworthy adjustments. According to Shane C. Murphy, CMT, in the range of approximately $88k–90k, the support for Bitcoin's price has weakened, and with changes in position distribution, the overall options market has gradually shifted from a previously more Long Gamma state to a Short Gamma dominance. The shift from Long Gamma to Short Gamma means that market makers and liquidity providers, as prices approach key strike prices and deviate, change their behavior from "counter-trend hedging" to more easily "trend-following passive accumulation," potentially amplifying volatility in local market conditions rather than suppressing it. This overall weakening of Gamma Exposure diminishes the previously formed "support band" and automatic buffer zone from the options market, and as prices move away from densely held areas, the spontaneous force of convergence and pullback weakens, making subsequent local trends more reliant on the inflow and outflow of spot and futures capital rather than solely on the options structure itself to maintain range order.

Options Influence Diminishes, Capital Control Shifts

In the dual context of declining Bitcoin Gamma exposure and overall falling implied volatility, the influence of options on intraday price rhythm and key positions has weakened compared to phases of high volatility. The inflow and outflow of spot and futures capital are beginning to determine short-term price structure and wave width to a greater extent. In this pattern, traders generally reduce leverage multiples, opting for rolling trades within relatively narrow price ranges to capture small volatility profits through more refined position management, or simply turning to selling options to earn premiums rather than seeking one-time extreme profits through heavy leverage. Unlike previous strategies that concentrated on aggressively increasing bullish or bearish positions and betting on large unilateral movements, the heat of the options market is shifting from directional concentrated betting to a more neutral, structurally laid-out approach aimed at yield enhancement and risk hedging, indicating that the low-volatility environment is reshaping the resource allocation logic of the derivatives market.

Winning Paradigms in the New Low-Volatility Normal

In an environment where implied volatility has significantly receded and Gamma exposure has weakened, the traditional strategy advantage of relying solely on "betting on the right trend" to achieve excess returns is continuously eroded. Capital must find a new balance between more refined position control, cost management, and volatility pricing, as the accuracy of single-direction judgments is no longer the sole core competitiveness. Institutions that can flexibly switch between various frameworks such as volatility arbitrage, covered combinations, and low-leverage range trading based on changes in volatility and market structure are more likely to maintain stable or even considerable returns during phases of "no obvious trend." Moving forward, it is essential to continuously track the shape of the implied volatility curve, the evolution of Gamma structure, and the direction of spot capital flows to determine whether the current low-volatility state is merely a temporary correction or will evolve into a "new normal" over a longer time scale, which will also dictate the defensive and offensive rhythm that capital should adopt before the next major market movement begins.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink