This week in UTC+8, two opposing forces emerged simultaneously in the on-chain and derivatives markets: on one side, BitMine continued to buy and stake ETH through over-the-counter institutions, locking chips long-term in the network; on the other side, anonymous whales leveraged up on Hyperliquid to short ETH. The data comparison surrounding 1.7 million ETH staked, 24,068 new purchases, 18,260 high-leverage short positions on ETH, and their floating losses clearly outlines the market divergence: some institutions choose to lock up their positions long-term to earn staking rewards, viewing ETH as a cash flow-generating asset, while hedge and trading funds bet on short-term price corrections, seeking to profit from volatility through high-leverage shorts.
Redistribution of Capital and Chips
● BitMine's accumulation path: According to on-chain and institutional trading data monitoring, BitMine recently purchased 24,068 ETH through FalconX, with a nominal value of approximately $80.57 million, and continued its operation of "buying and staking," reinvesting the new chips into the Ethereum consensus layer. The brief did not disclose specific timing, but the transaction was described as a continuous action rather than a one-time event.
● Massive staking scale: Comprehensive on-chain analysis indicates that BitMine currently has about 1.7 million ETH participating in staking, estimated to be around $5.65 billion based on the price provided in the brief. This figure is seen as approximately 40% of its total holdings, reflecting its strategy of locking nearly half of its chips in network security and yield acquisition.
● Total holding volume: Based on inferences from multiple on-chain tracking institutions, BitMine's overall ETH holdings are estimated to be around 4.17 million ETH, corresponding to a market value of about $13 billion. The brief clearly states that this is unofficial data inferred from on-chain analysis and has not been publicly confirmed by the company, thus it should only serve as a market reference point and not equate to authoritative financial reporting.
● Cash flow asset logic: If we take the annualized staking yield expectation of about $400 million mentioned in the brief as a baseline, the logic of using ETH is approaching the traditional notion of a "yield asset": it is not merely betting on price increases but rather occupying network rights long-term to earn protocol-level returns, viewing ETH as a component of an asset balance sheet that can generate stable cash flow. This trend aligns with the observation that more and more institutions are building portfolios around staking yields.
Hedging Game of Leveraged Shorts
● Over 20,000 contracts short: In stark contrast to BitMine's expansion in the spot and staking layers, an anonymous whale account appeared on the derivatives trading platform Hyperliquid, establishing a short position of 18,260 ETH on perpetual contracts. Based on the price in the brief, the nominal value of this position is approximately $60.63 million, representing a significant directional bet on a single asset.
● Combined risk exposure: This whale is not only betting on Ethereum; their account also holds a 5x leveraged short on XMR, bringing the total nominal risk exposure to about $61.9 million. The use of 25x high leverage on ETH combined with medium leverage on XMR means that this account is simultaneously betting on market downturns across multiple assets, raising the tolerance for volatility in the overall capital curve.
● Floating loss status signal: According to on-chain and exchange public data tracking, this ETH short is currently in a floating loss state of about $440,000. Although this loss is still within a controllable range compared to the total position size, it reveals that the whale's current short-term directional judgment is temporarily against the trend, as market prices have not quickly retraced as expected.
● Passive risk of high leverage: Under a 25x leverage structure, even slight price movements contrary to expectations can significantly amplify margin pressure. If ETH experiences a rapid surge, the account will need to continuously add margin to avoid triggering forced liquidation. Forced liquidations often occur at points of relatively thin liquidity and heightened volatility, amplifying the passive selling power of shorts and raising the cost of shorting, quickly deteriorating the risk-reward ratio in a one-sided market.
Dislocation of Long-term Locking and Short Betting
The long-term staking on BitMine's side and the high-leverage shorts on Hyperliquid's whale side represent a collision of two typical types of capital: the former is closer to "institutional allocation," obtaining protocol-level yields and long-term price elasticity through holding spot and participating in staking; the latter is a typical "trading capital," amplifying leverage without owning the spot, attempting to leverage limited capital to exploit short-term volatility.
From a temporal perspective, the staking yield model relies on multi-year dimensions of network usage, fee distribution, and inflation adjustments. Holders are willing to endure short-term price fluctuations in exchange for long-term continuous appreciation of the priced asset; conversely, the profit logic of high-leverage shorts heavily depends on a sufficiently large price retracement occurring within days to weeks. Any delays or reverse fluctuations will quickly erode their capital safety net.
This directional divergence existing simultaneously in the spot and derivatives layers often amplifies market volatility near key price levels: spot locking reduces the willingness to sell floating chips during declines, while leveraged shorts attempt to push prices down through contract selling pressure. The intertwining of these two forces makes short-term candlesticks more prone to "spike" style volatility. However, from a longer-term perspective, short-term short actions do not necessarily rewrite Ethereum's medium to long-term supply-demand structure; the contraction of circulating chips due to staking and withdrawals is still slowly reshaping the underlying landscape of the spot market.
It is important to emphasize that key information regarding BitMine's address ownership and total holding proportions currently relies mainly on on-chain inferences and analysis institutions' annotations, which naturally differ from the company's official disclosures. Mixing such inferred data with official financial metrics can lead to excessive interpretations of the real risk exposure and behavioral motives, which is particularly important to remain cautious about when analyzing the long and short game.
Traditional Giants Synchronizing Accumulation
Beyond BitMine's actions on-chain, the off-chain and custodial operations of traditional financial giants also form part of the background of Ethereum's capital landscape. The brief indicates that BlackRock recently withdrew 6,647 BTC and 4,179 ETH from Coinbase:
● Withdrawal scale and valuation: The aforementioned 6,647 BTC is estimated to be worth about $638 million at the time, while 4,179 ETH is approximately $13.76 million. Although the absolute amounts are not comparable to BitMine's ETH volume, considering BlackRock's role in spot products and institutional custody business, its marginal changes are still closely monitored by the market.
● Meaning of withdrawal signals: In industry practice, transferring assets from centralized exchanges to self-custody wallets or professional custodians is typically interpreted as a tendency towards medium to long-term holding or preparing underlying reserves for spot financial products, rather than short-term high-frequency trading within exchanges. The disappearance of such funds from the exchange side indicates a decreased probability of short-term selling.
● Institutional behavior resonance: Placing BlackRock's withdrawal actions alongside BitMine's staking expansion reveals that different types of institutions are increasing their exposure to ETH within their respective systems—one is withdrawing coins from exchanges, possibly entering custody or product structures; the other is buying coins over-the-counter and locking them into staking contracts. From observable market results, both are synchronously reducing the number of chips that can be sold in the secondary market at any time.
● Impact on the supply curve: As spot assets are continuously withdrawn and transferred to long-term holding wallets or locked in staking contracts, the truly high liquidity tradable chips in the secondary market will gradually shrink. The "hardening" of supply does not necessarily mean prices will rise unilaterally, but when demand shows marginal improvement or sentiment warms, prices often become more sensitive to new buying, and the slope of the supply curve changes accordingly.
When ETH is Treated as a Yield Asset
Using BitMine's expected annualized staking yield of about $400 million as a sample, we can more clearly see how institutions incorporate ETH into a cash flow discounting framework. From this perspective, ETH is no longer just a high-volatility asset that can rise or fall, but rather akin to an "equity certificate": under the premise of bearing certain price fluctuations, holders can obtain annual returns from the protocol layer, discounting these future cash flows back to form part of the current valuation.
In this assessment system, institutions need to weigh several variables simultaneously: first, the staking yield rate itself, which is closely related to network usage, fee levels, inflation, and destruction mechanisms; second, the magnitude of price fluctuations, as overly severe price drops may quickly erode years of staking yields; third, the lock-up period and liquidity risk, as the unlocking cycle of assets under the staking mechanism and the staking exit queue will limit institutions' ability to withdraw quickly in extreme market conditions. These considerations are not fundamentally different from their assessments of interest rates, dividend stability, and liquidity premiums in traditional bonds or dividend stocks.
BitMine's recent capital operations also reveal its overall risk appetite: the brief mentions that it invested $200 million in a company under MrBeast and released an aggressive target of expected 10x returns. In such a style, investing millions of ETH into staking, pursuing high annual yields and capital appreciation, is not contradictory but rather forms part of its "high-risk, high-reward" strategy landscape.
At the same time, as more large participants choose concentrated staking, new uncertainties are accumulating at the network level. On one hand, institutional staking may lead to increased validator concentration and potential shifts in governance rights; on the other hand, staking yields themselves are not set in stone and are significantly influenced by changes in network usage and economic parameters. For institutions seeking stable cash flow, such structural risks and uncertainties regarding yield sustainability may impact their pricing discount of ETH's "yield asset" attributes in the future.
Long and Short Confrontation and Next Variables
Based on the currently visible data, the current landscape can be summarized as follows: on one end are institutions, including BitMine, continuously amplifying long-term staking chips to seek medium to long-term yields through locking millions of ETH; on the other end are high-leverage funds represented by the Hyperliquid whale, betting on short-term corrections using tools like 25x shorts. This dislocation in time cycles and risk preferences presents a complex layered structure in Ethereum's long and short confrontation.
The key uncertainties affecting subsequent trends mainly concentrate on several aspects: first, BitMine's future staking rhythm and holding adjustment path—whether to continue increasing the staking proportion or to cash out at high levels—will directly impact the locking degree of ETH on-chain; second, the whale's short position unwinding and adding rhythm—if they choose to cut losses and exit in the face of expanding floating losses, it may trigger a short covering rally in a short time; third, broader changes in the macro liquidity environment, whether in interest rate expectations or shifts in risk preferences, may amplify or weaken the market impact of the aforementioned behaviors.
For traders, short-term operations need to fully respect the liquidation risks under leverage structures: in a 25x leverage environment, whether following shorts or countering them, even slight price movements can evolve into severe fluctuations in profit and loss at the account level. For medium to long-term funds focused on allocation, what is worth continuously tracking are the trends in staking proportions and the evolution of top institutions' holdings and withdrawal behaviors, as these slow variables are the underlying forces determining the supply-demand structure and pricing framework of Ethereum in the coming years.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
