On January 14, 2026, DZ Bank, Germany's second-largest bank, obtained a cryptocurrency trading license under the EU MiCAR framework and officially began operating its own crypto platform “meinKrypto” with this license, marking a significant milestone for traditional banking as it enters this new regulatory arena. On the same day, the price of Bitcoin surged past $95,000 in the global market, combined with the launch of a product suite supporting four mainstream assets: BTC, ETH, LTC, ADA. This move by the core institution of the cooperative banking system signifies that it is no longer just a technical experiment but a substantial entry into the crypto asset space amid an institution-led market trend. With the timing of traditional banking licenses, compliance frameworks, and the crypto bull market highly overlapping, a new round of competition has begun between European banks and the global crypto market, focusing on "who can attract incremental funds within regulatory boundaries" and "to what extent institutions will reshape market structure."

Germany's Second-Largest Bank Bets on Bitcoin

As a key pillar of the German banking system, DZ Bank has long played the role of a central institution in the cooperative banking consortium. Obtaining a cryptocurrency trading license under the MiCAR framework carries far more symbolic weight than just a single license. For regulators, it signals a shift of crypto business from fringe service providers to the core channels of traditional finance; for peers, it provides a replicable model regarding the question of "whether it is safe to offer crypto services under the new regulatory system." More dramatically, DZ Bank chose to complete this action at a time when Bitcoin's price had strongly broken through $95,000, and market sentiment was clearly bullish, with block trading accounting for over 40% of the market, further strengthening institutions' dominant position in price discovery and liquidity. In this context, DZ Bank is not "buying the dip" against the trend but is instead providing a compliant entry point for the already awakened institutional demand, reflecting a careful balance of risk and reward: on one hand, the bull market phase is conducive to rapidly amplifying customer interest and trading volume, validating the business model; on the other hand, it exposes the bank to higher volatility and greater scrutiny from regulators and public opinion, forcing it to configure risk control, compliance, and product design from the outset according to a "high-pressure scenario."

From Counter to APP: The Channel Deepening of Crypto Services

Unlike the traditional banking path of "reducing branches and signing documents," DZ Bank has chosen to open the crypto self-trading function of “meinKrypto” to cooperative bank customers through the existing VR Banking App digital channel. This means that cryptocurrency trading is embedded within a banking application that users are already familiar with, with account systems, identity verification, and fund flows following the original banking framework, making the user experience closer to "having an additional asset class in online banking" rather than switching to an unfamiliar third-party trading platform. Leveraging Germany's extensive network of Volksbanken, DZ Bank can extend this service from the headquarters level down to regional cooperative banks' retail and small-to-medium institutional clients, adding a layer of compliant digital crypto entry on top of traditional branch coverage and local community relationships. For German retail investors, this reshapes their path into the crypto market: shifting from reliance on specialized crypto trading platforms or fintech applications to making asset allocation decisions within a familiar "bank shell"; for small-to-medium institutions, it provides a way to gain crypto exposure within existing banking relationships, lowering the barriers to compliance, custody, and counterparty risk management, and may gradually encourage local financial institutions to view crypto assets as one of the standardized asset classes.

Demonstration Effect of the First Batch of Large Banks under MiCAR

Under the EU MiCAR regulatory framework, cryptocurrency trading licenses are clearly included in a unified rule system. Compared to the fragmented licensing model where each member state acted independently, the threshold for banks to participate is no longer about "finding a local regulatory loophole," but rather "meeting prudent regulatory and investor protection requirements under clear terms." As one of the first large banks to obtain a cryptocurrency trading license under this framework, DZ Bank's case naturally carries a demonstration effect of "the regulatory approval path has been successfully navigated." For European banks that are still observing, DZ Bank's entry not only provides a signal of compliance feasibility but also serves as a form of "compliance endorsement": if a systemically important German bank can operate a crypto platform under MiCAR, then successors designing their business on the same principles will see their regulatory uncertainty significantly reduced. In contrast, the U.S. market often sees institutional licenses embroiled in more complex political and judicial battles due to the lack of a unified legislative framework for crypto assets and the overlapping responsibilities of multiple regulatory bodies. Against this backdrop, the clarity of EU rules provides space for European banks to replicate DZ Bank's path: once the business logic and risk control models are validated, other banks can accelerate their follow-up on the same regulatory track, thereby forming a "banking cryptoization" route based on MiCAR within Europe, contrasting with the U.S. approach that leans more towards capital market tools like ETFs and trusts.

Exposing the Tech Stack: Modular Collaboration

To operate “meinKrypto,” DZ Bank did not attempt to build a full-stack crypto infrastructure from matching to custody to market access but instead adopted a more realistic "modular" tech stack: with Atruvia responsible for platform development, Boerse Stuttgart Digital providing custody services, and trade execution handled by EUWAX AG. This division of labor reflects a comprehensive consideration of risk, cost, and efficiency. On one hand, traditional banks have mature experience in information security, compliance, and auditing but are not adept at high-frequency matching engines or on-chain asset custody. Outsourcing these segments to specialized institutions with existing expertise in crypto and market infrastructure can lower trial-and-error costs and shorten project implementation cycles. On the other hand, from a regulatory perspective, banks can "transfer" part of the technology and operational risks to entities familiar with the field by collaborating with regulated professional service providers, which helps to quantify risks more effectively within internal models. This "modular entry" model provides a relatively gentle entry template for other conservative institutions: they do not have to bear all uncertainties from technology development to market operation at once but can piece together a regulatory-compliant, auditable, and iterative crypto service stack around their strengths in compliance, customer relationships, and asset allocation capabilities.

Regulatory Comparison under Institutional and Political Competition

The smooth licensing of DZ Bank under the MiCAR framework stands in stark contrast to the regulatory controversies in the U.S. market across the Atlantic. Previously, there were calls in the U.S. political arena to suspend the WLFI trust license until the Trump family divested its equity, pulling what should have been a regulatory dialogue focused on product risk and market order into a more politically charged competition. This also reflects a clear division: Europe chooses to lead with rules, delineating boundaries for various participants through a unified framework like MiCAR, and then discussing specific business forms within that framework; while the U.S. oscillates between institutional product innovation, regulatory authority division, and political stance conflicts, forcing market participants to consider legal risks and policy directions in their path choices. In such an environment, European banks like DZ Bank can advance crypto business within a relatively clear institutional design, focusing their main efforts on technology, security, and customer service; while U.S. institutions often need to seek compromise solutions in an uncertain regulatory context, predicting potential policy reversals while meeting compliance requirements. This difference in institutional environments will also influence the pace and form of crypto financial innovation in both regions to some extent.

After the Banks Enter: The Next Phase for Bitcoin and the Crypto Market

DZ Bank's acquisition of the MiCAR cryptocurrency trading license and entry into the market with the “meinKrypto” platform fundamentally changes the relationship between traditional banks and the crypto industry: shifting from a past "peripheral role" dominated by custody, payment channels, or indirect investment products to directly providing crypto trading and holding as a "channel hub" for end customers. This not only opens a new revenue and customer loyalty avenue for the bank itself but also introduces a heavyweight player with a large deposit base and risk management tradition into the crypto industry. In terms of institutional participation, the market has been accustomed to viewing companies like MicroStrategy and Metaplanet as representatives of "leveraged bets" on Bitcoin prices—just as Arthur Hayes described, these companies amplify the impact of a single asset's movement on stock prices and company value by deeply binding their balance sheets to Bitcoin. However, the banking path represented by DZ Bank is different; it does not directly carry large-scale Bitcoin exposure on its own balance sheet but instead introduces customer funds and asset allocation needs into this market in the form of a service platform and compliant channel, creating a stark contrast between "self-betting vs. client channel." Looking ahead, once more European banks follow DZ Bank's path under the MiCAR framework, compliant flows and institutional incremental funds are expected to gradually change the market structure in the medium to long term: on one hand, traditional banking channels may bring more stable purchasing and allocation demand for Bitcoin and other mainstream assets, smoothing out extreme volatility caused by retail sentiment; on the other hand, the deep involvement of the banking system will also introduce new variables in risk transmission, regulatory coordination, and market pricing mechanisms, accelerating the evolution of crypto assets from "marginal assets in the financial system" to "regulated global asset classes."

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefits Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。